Quote:
Originally Posted by ymmv
Funniest thing about it is that Inso is way too much of a coward to say anything remotely close to what he's said here in real life. Because deep down he knows his opinions are those of a simple bigot.
I'm a big boy and could probably handle the heat, but I rarely find myself as the only dissenter in a room with dozens of lefties, so I can't say for sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
Sorry but that's not how biology works, bro.
Did I use the wrong medical phraseology, or are you just telling me that gender is a social construct?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
So entitlement is when people get an elective medical procedure you don't like covered, but other kinds of elective medical procedures are fine. Personally, I think we should only have men with working erections in the military. Those that don't should not expect special treatment.
I disagree with this, but I'm fine with asking them to kick in for their own sex pills. You only run into a problem if the lack of boner coverage in the military's health plan is causing recruitment or retention issues. At that point, you must be willing to reconsider your stance.