Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

07-11-2017 , 02:34 PM
missed this Profile in Irony from yesterday

07-11-2017 , 02:34 PM
The best thing about this is if someone in Obama's administration did set them up that's not a bad thing it's ****ing awesome.
07-11-2017 , 02:37 PM

https://twitter.com/kasie/status/884815201433944065



07-11-2017 , 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
I now coin the word "somethingburger" and demand credit for its usage here and elsewhere
Oh no you don't. Search my account (and this very thread IIRC) before stealing my coins.
07-11-2017 , 02:37 PM
Trump statement on DJT via Huckabee child:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/presi...-transparency/

Quote:
"My son is a high quality person and I applaud his transparency."
Donald Trump talks about his kids like people write product reviews for Amazon third party sellers after having to process a return. "Despite the fact the 4 pack of Bounty Paper Towels were soaked in what appeared to be cat piss upon delivery, BestDealzPaperTowelz is a high quality person and I applaud his transparency and he offered me a full refund."
07-11-2017 , 02:40 PM
So when the news reports on it, it is "fake news." But when his son has his hand forced and reveals the emails, it is "transparency?"
07-11-2017 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
The best thing about this is if someone in Obama's administration did set them up that's not a bad thing it's ****ing awesome.
Also awesome is, the NYT didn't actually release any emails yet, right? Because if they published 3 parts of alibi-changing bombshells and then bluffed Fredo into posting the emails...****ing BOSS!
07-11-2017 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeroDeniro
So when the news reports on it, it is "fake news." But when his son has his hand forced and reveals the emails, it is "transparency?"
See above where a Republican Congressman praised Trump for his transparency and very quickly revealing the emails. After literally years of denial, aggressively calling everyone a liar, firing the FBI chief because he was too much of a busy body on Russia, these guys are going to take a victory lap for their transparency.
07-11-2017 , 02:46 PM
In fairness, these guys are pretty transparent.
07-11-2017 , 02:48 PM
Trump jr makes up for the quantity of tweets ala daddy with that alone.
07-11-2017 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Also awesome is, the NYT didn't actually release any emails yet, right? Because if they published 3 parts of alibi-changing bombshells and then bluffed Fredo into posting the emails...****ing BOSS!
According to nyt don jr posted the emails after he found out nyt had them
07-11-2017 , 02:48 PM
The Trump family dinner is going to be a tad tense tonight.

"So, Junior, how was your day? You know, other than you implicating everyone and their mother from your stupid decision to release your stupid emails on Twitter."
07-11-2017 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeroDeniro
Is that Brad Pitt over them at the table?
singer from Fine Young Cannibals, Brad, Courtney Love
07-11-2017 , 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
Trump not having tweeted anything on this yet is notable.
Nah, he is the POTUS, he is busy working and doesnt have time to spend on twitter.
07-11-2017 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by superleeds
singer from Fine Young Cannibals, Brad, Courtney Love
I think you have it wrong.

It's Dave Chappelle, Brad, and Traci Lords.
07-11-2017 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
In other news, Mitch McConnell has delayed the August senate recess by two weeks.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/pol...AIP/story.html
The best part was when he cited "unprecedented obstructionism" as a reason lol

It's like the Senate Majority Leader understands neither the Senate nor "majority"
07-11-2017 , 02:53 PM
Pretty sure that's cate blanchet
07-11-2017 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
Pretty sure that's cate blanchet
I dunno. Looks like Brad to me.
07-11-2017 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeroDeniro
Trump's upcoming tweet:

"Just because I sat next to her doesn't mean I met her. I sit next to lots of people. Lots of smart, beautiful people."
To be fair, if you have contact with many different people everyday you wont remember many of them, especially when you are as self obsessed as Trump.
07-11-2017 , 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrollyWantACracker
In fairness, these guys are pretty transparent.
nh
07-11-2017 , 03:05 PM
Huckabee Sanders can't seem to find her "fake news" and "the real story is" lines. Sticking to referring to outside counsel.
07-11-2017 , 03:08 PM
Hilarious that these guys were so scared to legitimize the "fake" NY Times that they may have set their entire house on fire and won't be able to put it out. Love the transparency!
07-11-2017 , 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoltinJake
I can't believe how conspiratorial this is getting, but this story about the server in Trump Tower seems relevant again. Were they using it as the back-channel until the NYT came calling? Traffic between the servers stopped after that, according to Slate.

Wouldn't be too shocking if Kushner was trying to get a new back-channel open if their old one had to be closed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoltinJake
Perhaps an important word from the WaPo article:
Quote:
For instance, according to those officials and the letter, Kushner conveyed to the Russians that he was aware that it would be politically sensitive to meet publicly, but it was necessary for the Trump team to be able to continue their communication with Russian government officials.
Relevant again. The traffic on the server ramped up 10 days after this Trump Jr meeting.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEV_RHuVoAAaxG4.jpg
07-11-2017 , 03:11 PM
As far as Trump goes, none of this matters unless and until Paul Ryan and the rest of the stooges are ready to abandon ship, right? And THAT'S not going to happen unless and until their gerrymandered/boosted-by-voter-suppression constituencies demand it, right?

      
m