Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

07-10-2017 , 11:46 PM
It's not treason if the people in charge say they are our friends.
07-10-2017 , 11:54 PM
it's not treason if the traitors win. trump is like the george washington of russian puppet state dictators.
07-10-2017 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Trump's distract-at-all-costs tweets tomorrow morning are gonna some whoppers
imagine he and GOP are close to restarting the clinton investigations. They've been saving that one. The media will turn back to that instantly like they did in the campaign.

also trump may be aware he can just pardon everyone and then what...
07-11-2017 , 12:03 AM
A fun reminder that when Kushner's dad got in trouble he screwed his brother in law.
07-11-2017 , 12:08 AM
16 people believed dead in military plane crash in Mississippi

not terribly relevant to the thread ordinarily but maybe tomorrow Trump goes all-in on hiding behind these Marines to deflect
07-11-2017 , 12:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceKicker
She was dominating him in the debates, but if she goes snarky for that softball question, then all anyone talks about the next day is "that ***** couldn't even say one nice thing," every other answer she gave is forgotten, and Trump becomes the victim. It's a ridiculous question, but you have to play along.
You don't have to play along though. Trump had proven this by denying climate change and Obama's birth certificate, calling Mexicans rapists, saying McCain is not a war hero because he got caught, Access Hollywood tape, 12 women accusing him of sexual assault, and winning the ****ing nomination. What exactly does Trump need to do before she can dodge that question for political gain?
07-11-2017 , 12:14 AM
Yeah, that's a good point. I actually thought Trump was gonna insult her for his answer, but he played it straight.

But imagine the run on fainting couches in red states if Hillary went after him.
07-11-2017 , 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
16 people believed dead in military plane crash in Mississippi

not terribly relevant to the thread ordinarily but maybe tomorrow Trump goes all-in on hiding behind these Marines to deflect
Doubtful. So far his admin hasn't commented on many military deaths. This was an accident so they may say something oppose to soldiers killed overseas.
07-11-2017 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeuceKicker
Yeah, that's a good point. I actually thought Trump was gonna insult her for his answer, but he played it straight.

But imagine the run on fainting couches in red states if Hillary went after him.
who cares? those red states already have their vote locked up
07-11-2017 , 12:35 AM
Gonna suspect that...

07-11-2017 , 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
16 people believed dead in military plane crash in Mississippi

not terribly relevant to the thread ordinarily but maybe tomorrow Trump goes all-in on hiding behind these Marines to deflect
I guess it will be up to fox and friends, but I doubt that is the direction he goes.

Expect words like fake news, cnn, hoax, Clinton, Sanders, dnc server.

Later in the day, someone with half a brain will try to move towards something like the crash or healthcare, but that won't happen before donnie gets his coffee and tweets.
07-11-2017 , 12:42 AM
Huckabeast at gaggle today: Donnie Jr. had no idea whether or not the Russian gov't was behind the info or not therefore it was just some random Russian.

NYTimes: The email said the russian gov't had info to give.


If I got caught in some **** this deep I'd be ****ed. One time dealer.
07-11-2017 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
who cares? those red states already have their vote locked up
No answer changes the minds of either rabid Trump supporters or rabid HRC supporters. A safe answer changes no minds anywhere on the spectrum. But I think there's a small chance a snarky answer turns off some undecideds or HRC-leaning repubs who can't stand Trumps crassness. Her whole campaign was run on a "I'm the adult in the room" message. She can't afford to give ammo to the "they're both the same" chorus of morons.

Obviously in hindsight it didn't matter; white women found a reason to pull the lever for Trump and they have the "Trump can grab my pussy" T-shirts to prove it.
07-11-2017 , 12:56 AM
I am looking forward to hearing more about the retention & security standards for email in the Trump campaign. Some critical emails disappearing without a trace would be perfection.
07-11-2017 , 01:00 AM
fly's response that "saying something nice" is some meaningless bull**** was pretty much the best line to take imo
07-11-2017 , 01:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chips Ahoy
I am looking forward to hearing more about the retention & security standards for email in the Trump campaign. Some critical emails disappearing without a trace would be perfection.
Clinton bleached her emails. Trump will spray tan his.
07-11-2017 , 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
fly's response that "saying something nice" is some meaningless bull**** was pretty much the best line to take imo
Nah. That was a question by an audience member iirc. Fly's answer would have been seen as rude to the audience member and reinforced Hillary's cold, elitist ***** stereotype.

Obviously, that is the RIGHT answer, morally, but politically it would have been a failure. I think a good goal for the Democratic party would be to reach a point where rejecting that question feels right and natural. Take a strong turn away from that Ossoff style "work across the aisle" garbage and treat governance like serious work with right and wrong answers, where the wrong answers can destroy lives.
07-11-2017 , 01:26 AM
watching fox right now and it is hilarious

literally blaming obama for letting the russian lawyer into the united states and asking if this was all a set up by the DNC and we need to figure out if the fbi, cia, etc was involved

would be funny if it wasnt being blasted into the homes of tens of millions of moron olds who vote 100% of the time
07-11-2017 , 01:28 AM
This showed up in my feed and gave me a chuckle.

Why Trump got an 11 out of 10 at the G20

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/10/opinio...ord/index.html

Note the byline.
07-11-2017 , 01:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
This showed up in my feed and gave me a chuckle.

Why Trump got an 11 out of 10 at the G20

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/10/opinio...ord/index.html

Note the byline.
Opinion piece written by Jeffrey Lord. That's about all that needs to be said. He is truly an idiot.
07-11-2017 , 01:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
chris matthews on point tonight. correctly pointing out that the only way trump's line wrt russia makes sense is if putin has leverage on him or his family. any other reading of what he's been saying and doing makes him look weird/dumb/legit insane, but if you assume trump has been working as a russian agent all his actions make sense
That's a pretty interesting theory. Trump being a traitor would explain all of his crazy ideas, actions, and doublespeak. It's either that or he is an incompetent moron. Anyone vote for both?
07-11-2017 , 01:37 AM
Don Jr being nicknamed Diaper Don is awkward, we need that nickname available for when the pee tape drops.
07-11-2017 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corvette24
That's a pretty interesting theory. Trump being a traitor would explain all of his crazy ideas, actions, and doublespeak. It's either that or he is an incompetent moron. Anyone vote for both?
well outside of russia, the rest is just from his personality. That personality loves to get people fighting each other for no good ****ing reason.
07-11-2017 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
Nah. That was a question by an audience member iirc. Fly's answer would have been seen as rude to the audience member and reinforced Hillary's cold, elitist ***** stereotype.

Obviously, that is the RIGHT answer, morally, but politically it would have been a failure. I think a good goal for the Democratic party would be to reach a point where rejecting that question feels right and natural. Take a strong turn away from that Ossoff style "work across the aisle" garbage and treat governance like serious work with right and wrong answers, where the wrong answers can destroy lives.
ehh, if it was an audience member question then yea that isn't optimal to berate. if it's coming from some chris wallace-esque hack, then clearly going HAM on the interviewer while throwing shade at orange daddy is the pro move
07-11-2017 , 01:55 AM
Chris Wallace actually seems like the only sane person at Fox News ainec

      
m