Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

02-01-2017 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
lou- Continuing to nurse a grudge over Bork for three ****ing decades while your party was completely taken over by white nationalists is one of the reasons I know you voted for Trump.

The other reason, of course, is that you support Trump. Wholeheartedly, on every issue except trade. You and Trump agree because you and Trump are products of the same media-entertainment ecosystem.
I don't support the Muslim ban. It's bad policy and immoral.
02-01-2017 , 06:57 PM
Goofy,

C'mon now man you should realize by now that my targets are primarily corporatists, fake liberals, and the democratic establishment. See: majority of my 'discussions' with Mr. "OWS was pointless and stupid and everyone involved should be ashamed" FlyWF

FlyWf,

Why do you think I put "fake news" in quotations? I agree with you and the term has lost most meaning. Still though, if I am so outraged I am posting and calling for murder charges over something and it turns out to be a hoax, chances are I am going to apologize for helping to spread said hoax I wonder how many people who were so outraged over this MURDER are still completely unaware that it is a hoax? Seems almost like it is a fake news story at this point for anyone circulating that information?
02-01-2017 , 07:04 PM
none of these bans mean **** unless you cut the head of the snake off (the saudis and their dirty money) as long as the saudis arent banmed, it doesnt matter if you ban the rest of the world. the 9/11 bunch got into america thru saudi help. so im not sure what this **** show is suppose to do, FULL MEASURE OR NO MEASURE
02-01-2017 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
I may be wrong here, as maybe the whole discussion with np## began before I thought, but I think his first reply was when Double Eagle was asking who should be CHARGED WITH MURDER as a result of the travel executive order because a "woman had died" because of it, which WAS A HOAX. But where was Double Eagle to walk back and apologize for his "fake news"?

Anyhow, the points I do agree with you all is that Scott Adams is a clueless clown, and np## you should realize that and not respect that dude in the least, lest you be a clown yourself.
I like clowns who get things right when swimming against the stream....
02-01-2017 , 07:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
I may be wrong here, as maybe the whole discussion with np## began before I thought, but I think his first reply was when Double Eagle was asking who should be CHARGED WITH MURDER as a result of the travel executive order because a "woman had died" because of it, which WAS A HOAX. But where was Double Eagle to walk back and apologize for his "fake news"?

Anyhow, the points I do agree with you all is that Scott Adams is a clueless clown, and np## you should realize that and not respect that dude in the least, lest you be a clown yourself.
Thats not fake news. I think you arent such a clown to actually think it is. So i guess that maked me confused about why you labeled it so and what your actual point is.
02-01-2017 , 07:11 PM
Np, for the 900th time, Scott Adams did not get anything "right." Pick whichever user in this forum you think is wrong the most often. Scott Adams is wrong more than that.

Dan, I don't remember the rest of the post but only really keyed into the Adams bit. If np found a nut, congrats to the blind squirrel today.
02-01-2017 , 07:12 PM
np,

Yeah but his overall thesis was completely busted, and all of the info is there for you to read. Maybe some of his points turned out to have some merit (I am not super well versed in all of his views), but I do know he certainly had plenty that were WAY off the mark.

Trump's victory did nothing to gain respect for Scott Adams in my eyes, and it shouldn't yours. People like Michael Moore and Sarah Kendzior were far, far more insightful and correct in their understanding of the US political climate heading into the election.

Scott Adams is just some weird dumbass with demonstrably incorrect insight.

Victor, see my reply re: "fake news".
02-01-2017 , 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Uh, ~every NeverTrump "moderate" voted for Trump, dude. That's my side of the argument.
Ok. I don't think that's true. Exit polling showed that Trump took a hit among educated R's. I assume that's Lou's demo.
02-01-2017 , 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Actually you said internment of "Americans", which made it accurate. Now as you state it w/o "Americans" it's not quite right. We put hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese in camps 30 years later. (mostly under a Democratic administration I think.)
Wait... we put hundreds of thousands of US citizen Vietnamese in internment camps in the USA? I must have missed that while I was trying to avoid the draft :-)
02-01-2017 , 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
I know there was a story a few days ago about us moving more military assets into the Baltic region. I assumed that was in order to protect Russia from NATO.
they're going there to attend the lavish game-of-thrones style wedding for all the nato and russian armies that putin decided to host
02-01-2017 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
np,

Yeah but his overall thesis was completely busted, and all of the info is there for you to read. Maybe some of his points turned out to have some merit (I am not super well versed in all of his views), but I do know he certainly had plenty that were WAY off the mark.

Trump's victory did nothing to gain respect for Scott Adams in my eyes, and it shouldn't yours. People like Michael Moore and Sarah Kendzior were far, far more insightful and correct in their understanding of the US political climate heading into the election.

Scott Adams is just some weird dumbass with demonstrably incorrect insight.
Sorry I found his blog posts interesting and with his "demonstrably incorrect insight" he somehow got it right early while wavering a bit.

I enjoy reading his dumb asses ramblings far more that the Chicken Little Hitlerian and apoplectic nonsense here :-)
02-01-2017 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
they're going there to attend the lavish game-of-thrones style wedding for all the nato and russian armies that putin decided to host
02-01-2017 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Np, for the 900th time, Scott Adams did not get anything "right." Pick whichever user in this forum you think is wrong the most often. Scott Adams is wrong more than that.

Dan, I don't remember the rest of the post but only really keyed into the Adams bit. If np found a nut, congrats to the blind squirrel today.
Ahhhhh the old broken clock saying again......
02-01-2017 , 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
In what states do the dems have to defend Senate seats that Trump won by double digits?
When did Trump win a Senate seat?
02-01-2017 , 07:23 PM
Np confirmed hypnotized by a master persuader.
02-01-2017 , 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
I want them to explain it purely on retributive grounds. The GOP changed the rules. The rules can go back after Obama's nomination gets a hearing and Garland was a totally moderate pick.

The GOP was openly saying they'd resist Hillary's pick for 4 years.

The Democrats might as well all resign if they're going to accept these rules.

And on top of that, it's not like George H.W. Bush or Dwight Eisenhower is POTUS.

How do you argue for norms now, after the administration is ignoring Federal District Court orders?
+1 to all of this and note that you don't even have to qualify that he was a moderate pick at all as that shouldn't even matter.
02-01-2017 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
that is really funny ty
02-01-2017 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
Wait... we put hundreds of thousands of US citizen Vietnamese in internment camps in the USA? I must have missed that while I was trying to avoid the draft :-)
So you can't read.
02-01-2017 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
So you can't read.
You act surprised.
02-01-2017 , 07:42 PM
CBP and US Attorney agree a green card holder should be allowed to return. He's on the plane.

2 stranded overseas by Trump travel ban allowed to return to Chicago
http://trib.in/2jWQXi5
02-01-2017 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatal Checkraise
Democrats are useless ****ing cowards.

DeVos confirmed, 52-47
Tha fuuuuuuuuck? Who flipped?
02-01-2017 , 07:51 PM
DeVos should have been the easiest to not confirm. Totally unqualified and ignorant. Did her family donate to Democrats too?
02-01-2017 , 07:54 PM
Again, the 52-47 DeVos vote was to pass her through committee, not to confirm her as SecEd.
02-01-2017 , 07:56 PM
Ah. Hold that thought for a bit then.
02-01-2017 , 07:57 PM
You guys seriously need to calm down and quit with the mob mentality stuff lol

      
m