Do we still have Alaska?

One time dealer!

putin is said to have denied the election hacking, and trump is said to have accepted that denial. so, problem solved, it's time to fire muller and start that new jersey manhunt for morbidly obese computer hackers

They vote republican, so they're staying.

Trump wants us to work with Russia on cybersecurity. WAAF

Nope, just given back to Russia.

But now it's going to be so much harder for North Korea to nuke American soil! Checkmate libtards.

lol



LOL

I'm concerned that Mueller is focused in building criminal cases that he can prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Tyge more important part of his exercise is informing the public about what Trump did and building a case for impeachment. They probably get to the same place, but the second route is faster.

In fairness to Mueller, this isn't really his role. It's much more the former (build a criminal case) than it is to achieve a political outcome.

The thing Trump could do that would really help Putin is start a ME war to drive up oil prices. Rut roh.

Twas too predictable.

**** I hate this Trump guy.

Anyone hear about Trump's behind the scenes LEAKS hunt? It popped in my head sometime last week, and it definitely felt too silent to be good. Now I know why, and it's ****ed up. Check out Politico's report on it:

Trump’s leaks crackdown sends chills through national security world

Good times, good times

He tries Tiffany but Putin ends up with Ivanka

https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/883137928444203008

It's not enough like "Oafish Opportunist" for Trump. Sounds more like Putin maybe.

And if I corrected someone's grammar with a grammatically incorrect sentence, yes, that would be irony. But that's not what happened

A typo is not incorrect grammar.

Pear on the board and nobody pared their hole cards.

They all had a suited queen in the hole? Think before you post. Ha sounds like poker isn't your game. Leave it to the thinkers like me m'sir.

Tomatoe Tomahto

She basically was. She was Donald Trump lite. Not as rich as Trump. Not quite as dumb. Not as bombastic. She held the same simplistic, populist views that unintelligent people identify with but didn't dress them up with sleazy salesmanship the way Trump did.

She definitely planted the seeds for this whether she knew it or not.

As for this Clovis spat, I think it's wise to remain nuanced when discussing complex topics like racism and discerning different forms and degrees of racism rather than lumping them all together. Just because the right has decided to take a bat to intellectual discourse doesn't mean that we should follow it up with the coup de grâce. Doing so does not make racism acceptable but it allows us to address people as individuals (or at least in smaller demographics) which makes helping them see things differently an easier task.

Ultimately, somebody has to stand in favor of intellectualism and not allow themselves to get bogged down in fights between anti-intellectuals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_law

This guy gets it.