Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

02-01-2017 , 03:30 PM
"Mr Spicer, why is president Trump so great? Could you describe the smell of his cock for us"

"Uh yes, thank you Skype caller."
02-01-2017 , 03:31 PM
Mr Spicer! How many hole in ones did President Trump hit this morning?
02-01-2017 , 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pwn_Master
Rococo, good sir, please have the decency to respond my query which I spent a considerable amount of time drafting to address your concerns.

I also have an additional query for you, if Sir Gorsuch were a true gentleman and Constitutional scholar, would he not insist that the Senate has abdicated its Constitutional duty to consider Sir Garland and demand that they do so before considering him?
Er... you can't append the title 'Sir' to the person's surname. Only to their first name.
02-01-2017 , 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Unpossible.

The overarching, encouraging thing I've seen so far is that California has made a point of defending liberalism from Trump, not just by individual actors but by the entire state itself. The leaders of the state legislature chambers issued statements right after the election saying they're going to fight Trump, the state retained Eric Holder, SF has already sued over their sanctuary city policies. We've dug in and we're ready to fight, seems like the rest of the country (and some of our longer-tenured federal representatives) is a little more behind on that one.
Washington state will be joining the fight. They have also sued the white house
02-01-2017 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
You have to save your complaints for the guillotine when they'll be respected. If you complain too soon, Trump voters and Fox News won't take you seriously.
02-01-2017 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Mr Spicer! How many hole in ones did President Trump hit this morning?
Trump is no il-Kim who shot a 38 under par on his first time out.
02-01-2017 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
Er... you can't append the title 'Sir' to the person's surname. Only to their first name.
Sir Red,

That could be presented as a little interesting info, but Err.... that's not possible from a pompous nazi propaganda posting windbag like you.

Also, no1curr about any of that old English Aristocracy ****.
02-01-2017 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbfg
Bragging about Facebook Live viewers
Yes millions of Russians watched his show.
02-01-2017 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
They largely subscribe to Obama's view that there are consequences to election results.
OBAMA WON IN 2012 BRAH. THE REPUBLICANS ALREADY KILLED THE NORM.
02-01-2017 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
It may not be that well known now, but 13.5 years after Watergate I doubt people in the Senate forgot that Bork was a political hack.
A big factor in the Bork nomination is that he was replacing Lewis Powell, liberals didn't want a big ideological shift on the court and that's what Powell-to-Bork would have been. Gorsuck has that going for him I guess since he's replacing Scalia.
02-01-2017 , 03:59 PM
At any rate, Bork got a hearing. He got voted down. Reagan got a chance to put another nomination forward.

That's not at all what happened to Garland.
02-01-2017 , 03:59 PM
Just saw that Tillerson was confirmed but don't see any list of the vote - which Ds voted for/which Rs voted against?
02-01-2017 , 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Just saw that Tillerson was confirmed but don't see any list of the vote - which Ds voted for/which Rs voted against?
4 Ds haven't seen who but would assume Heitkamp, Manchin, Donnelly, and one other
02-01-2017 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeroDeniro
Anyone else get a Spin City Michael J. Fox vibe from Sean Spicer during these briefings?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeroDeniro
I think I'm suffering some kind of Stockholm Syndrome because Spicer is growing on me.
There's something amusing and manic about him, like he's had 4 redbulls and is jacked on caffeine. He damn near winks at the audience while trying to spin things.
02-01-2017 , 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul McSwizzle
Yeah I mean, for all the "POPULAR VOTE DOESNT MATTER!!!" button mashing, let's not forget a majority of the people in the country still voted for a party that now controls nothing. Seems flawed.

Let's remember that party controlled EVERYTHING 8 short years ago and now controls nothing because it lost touch with a large swath of the voting electorate.

The rules didn't change in the past 8 years.

And adhering to the Constitution isn't button mashing, imo.
02-01-2017 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
Let's remember that party controlled EVERYTHING 8 short years ago and now controls nothing because it lost touch with a large swath of the voting electorate.

The rules didn't change in the past 8 years.

And adhering to the Constitution isn't button mashing, imo.
Democrats have won the popular vote 6 out of the last 7 elections.
02-01-2017 , 04:05 PM
Since when did any of you actually care about adhering to the constitution?

Nice meme, bro
02-01-2017 , 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Just saw that Tillerson was confirmed but don't see any list of the vote - which Ds voted for/which Rs voted against?
Manchin, Warner, Heitkamp voted for.

When the 738k people in North Dakota get the same say as the 38 million people in California on SoS I guess it's no surprise that it ends up being a fossil fuel exec.
02-01-2017 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeroDeniro
So the CNN banner thing right now says 13 civilians killed in the Yemen raid.

So we have killed 13 Arab civilians in the first 11 days of Trump's reign versus zero American civilians killed in the US by Arabs.

Yeah we really need this ban. We are in so much danger. If anyone needs a ban, it's the Middle East of US armed forces.
One of the Arabs was an American civilian child too!
02-01-2017 , 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Manchin, Warner, Heitkamp voted for.
****ing Warner is terrible and we can't get rid of him.
02-01-2017 , 04:07 PM
Rococo - You know that multiple Republican senators said before the election that they would continue to block Hillary from filling the seat, right?

You are way too concerned with idealistic norms and totally divorced from the political reality. If you believe in liberal policies, the correct move is to fight back. Not roll over endlessly until the court is filled 9-0 with conservatives.
02-01-2017 , 04:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Manchin, Warner, Heitkamp voted for.
Mother****er you represent VIRGINIA
02-01-2017 , 04:12 PM
Meanwhile, Russia is taking over Ukraine. Trump silent.
02-01-2017 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Manchin, Warner, Heitkamp voted for.

When the 738k people in North Dakota get the same say as the 38 million people in California on SoS I guess it's no surprise that it ends up being a fossil fuel exec.
Also King (I-ME) for, Chris Coons (D-DE) skipped the vote. 56-43.

And here's why (on Coons)



https://twitter.com/jbendery/status/826891640677736449

Last edited by sportsjefe; 02-01-2017 at 04:37 PM.
02-01-2017 , 04:20 PM
Trump had every black person he has ever met in the room for that abortion of a black history speech

      
m