Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
I reject the premise that those people were smart and experienced. They may have thought they were angle shooting but neither smart nor experienced are acceptable words to describe someone who actually carefully weighed their options and chose Trump.
I don't think David's argument was necessarily that they were smart, just that they gambled.
See here in response to Peter Thiel's quote that the American political system didn't have enough corruption and that things were 'too boring'. I wrote this back in January:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...php?p=51518374
Quote:
This was more or less the rationale for lots of normal morons too. "Oh sure Hillary Clinton seems competent and experienced, but she just turns me off. That Trump guy, he's going to shake up the system!" Tons of voters just like yukking it up with Trump and thought he was a funny clown and normal politicians are so boring and trite and so this seems like a good idea and when pressed, just made some vague hand-waving allusions to how normal politicians are tedious and Trump is really going to do some unexpected crazy things and that will be so exciting.
My informal read is that plenty of people thought or think the median outcome of a Trump Presidency was incompetence or standard-fare, boring, mainstream politics but gambled he was going to make jobs and money fall from the sky and build the wall and make Mexico pay for it and all his other nonsense empty promises.
I don't want to put words in Sklansky's mouth here but think of Trump as the mediocre white person's political lottery ticket. Yeah he seems pretty unstable and might be corruptible or sell us down the river, but his promises sound outstanding, Hillary Clinton puts me to sleep with this boring stuff so: voting for Trump. They priced the downside risk as low because they're white and maybe older, on a fixed income, whatever, figured things couldn't ever get that bad for whites but maybe just maybe he'd do all the magical things he promised. It's not even a bad bet, right? Old angry whites DO have a ton of political leverage. The GOP is probably going to grift some from them but if **** gets really bad, they're gambling the authortarian jackboots will land on the young taking it to the streets and immigrants and black people first, or the pain will be felt by some foreigners we invade or bomb, or whoever, maybe the press will get clubbed, who knows, but ultimately the gamble is that old whites make that the political system go round, and the sytem will eventually genuflect to them and spare them any real downside. It is probably true enough?
Last edited by DVaut1; 05-26-2017 at 03:11 PM.