Is it, though? Trump says something like, "This is the worst, believe me, the worst witch hunt in the history of politics. Biggest ever. In Americ--- no, in the history of the world. Just the biggest. Carried out by the worst people. The Democrats are mad, they're angry. They lost an election, I won - I wasn't supposed to win, but I did, in the biggest electoral college victory ever. 306 electoral votes, they said I had no chance. They're mad they lost an election they were supposed to win. Just a huge, huge, bigly victory for me. Bigly. So this witch hunt, it's just nothing there. They're stopping us from helping the real Americans who need help. So we need to get back to Making America Great Again, and because of that I'm pardoning everyone they're going after so we can get back to winning bigly and Making America Great Again. This witch hunt is officially over."

How many Congressional Republicans would actually stand up to that? Keep in mind these *******s are trying to ask about leaks against Trump/the administration in all these hearings.

Pope Francis looks absolutely disgusted to be in the presence of the Trump family. Hell the Trump family minus Donald looks miserable.

I mean given the mini-feud Francis and Donald had during the primary, it's unsurprising. But still the guy can't husband enough strength to fake a smile.

GOP could very well be the ones in need of those presidential pardons.

The irony is that some people push to say that the Berniecrats or whatever are following some cult of Bernie, but Bernie, as everyone points out, isn't that charismatic, charming, etc. He's an old curmudgeon. The only thing that attracts people to him is he has a simple concrete narrative and simple concrete solutions, both of which carry much more emotional gravitas than the Clinton Third Way The Are No Bad People Except Racists We Just Need To Find Better Solutions And Here Is a 10 Point Solution Involving Having To Know Derivatives To Fill Out Your Taxes and he's been consistent over time. You can hand off the movement to practically anyone as long as they have an honest track record.

FoxNews sinks to 3rd in ratings for the first time in? decades? Maybe not. In any case it's a free roll for us. Let's get Hannity out and see what happens.

You mean like when Trump made fun of a POW war hero and his base deserted him? They don't give a flying ****. Trump could come out tomorrow and bash homeless disabled vets for mooching off the system and they'd cheer him on.

I'd say he's more charismatic than you give him credit for. His speeches may not have the soaring rhetoric that Obama employs, but he does control his pitch/volume well, and he delivers extremely well on self-righteous anger. He's extremely credible on fighting for the lower/middle class and against the 1%. His advertisements were spectacular, and he had stump speech lines that resonated and got the crowds riled up.

If Obama is a 10/10 on charisma and Clinton is a 3/10, Bernie is in between in the 5-6 range. Also, in a time where there is a lot of anger in the lower/middle class and you need to harness it, he's about as good as it gets. Trump did the same thing on the right.

Finally, handing it off to someone with an honest track record is easier said than done... How many honest track records exist in Congress? Also, I'd probably use the word genuine or steadfast. It's not just honesty, it's unwavering commitment to a set of issues over a long career. You can be honest and flip flop like crazy without lying about it. That's not genuine, though.

So it's not to say someone couldn't change their mind on a few issues, or shift positions a little, but they need to be genuine to be as beloved as Bernie has been.

So, like no one.

Ok, tongue in cheek there.

But, generally I don't think there should be a concentration on central figures or leaders/representatives. We just need delegates from time to time.

A one page bullet pointed piece would have exponentially more effect.

Bass Pro Shops seems like the hardest target of all those. If they pulled out of Hannity and made a show of it - they'd lose a TON of business. Start with something like Directv imo.

• people burn oil and coal

• planet get hotter

• mar-a-largo flooded

• trump lose money

• trump stop oil burning?

My god if he actually did something like that. People always say "How did the Nazis go along with it for so long?" And you could point to every Trump supporter after he pardoned his entire cabinet and say "You, you would be the Nazi who goes along with it until the end."

And then they would say you are mean and the reason they voted for Trump in the first place and you would commence to rip out your own eardrums out of pure insanity.

I have no doubt that every hardcore Trump supporter I know would actively cheer Muslims and pretty much anyone publicly critical of Trump getting rounded up into camps. My Aunt might have a twinge when I get shipped off. But she'd rationalize it.

It's scary. Flip 40% to 60% and this country becomes fascism very quickly.

"It's for his own good, really. Liberalism really is a mental disorder."

i know, it's really the only one of those ****hole companies that i regularly do business with tho. been meaning to ***** at them for a while for downgrading their fishing selection anyway so **** them

The Pope isn't smiling because he's angry or has a case of the sads. He's sending a message to leaders around the world. "This guy cannot be trusted."

Could Mike Flynn already have an immunity deal with the FBI?

That could explain the public immunity request turning into a stonewall to the committees 2 months later.

I'm trying to think of the timing of it and when he could have flipped. I also still think there's a chance that Flynn's FBI cooperation was what Nunes discovered on his mystery excursion. It would explain the report that he, the guy who let him into the WH, and the Flynn protégé (the one who was getting fired, but Trump stepped in to save his job) went into the SCIF that night to hack into the FBI files to see his Q&A. If they were successful, they could have discovered Flynn had flipped. After that, **** went haywire...Nunes ran to Paul Ryan first thing in the morning, and to brief Trump, and to brief the press. During the press conference, his answers were babble and he looked like a guilty-ass ghost. Trump had him blowing up committees, and canceling hearings with Yates about Flynn, and running other obvious interference for 2+ weeks, until he was forced to recuse.

Any issues with this theory? One last comment is that I'm fairly certain the committees would need to check with the Feds, each other, etc. before granting immunity to someone.

Yup. I am unpatriotic and exposing the country to danger. No one wanted it to come to this, but our future as a nation is at stake.

Alright maybe I am wrong. Dude clearly hates Trump. LOL.

And Donald looks like "Hey, I got this great car to sell you. Trust me."

Good letter, but it'd be much more effective if you learned that proper nouns like "seth rich" need to be capitalized.

It's definitely turning into a major struggle. I honestly can't tell who's the favorite at the moment. But, it does appear to be heating up more as the stakes of the Trump situation increase.

Side note: An impeachment would set the base OFF.

Trump f*cked up again and told the Phillipines President offhandedly that we have two nuclear subs near North Korea

https://www.buzzfeed.com/nancyyousse...LXV#.mv7PwJDpQ

That's the reason Trump isn't getting impeached. It would set the base off and the GOP would get crushed in the elections.