Quote:
Originally Posted by ASAP17
That's different from what he suggested of ISIS sending someone from an area under intense scrutiny on a plane to America to commit an attack especially from a commander within ISIS. Their manifesto specifically states for their soldiers to do just that. Go into a market and shoot a bunch of people or run em down with a truck specifically. Many of the attacks are from people self radicialized just like any mass shooter. ISIS claims responsibility to every attack that looks like they may be involved as a recruiting tool. Many have turned out that they had no prior contact or instruction from ISIS.
Your original point was that ISIS isn't attacking in the US because of the vigilance of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies. I think it's much more likely to be for other reasons - they don't have the resources, they have other priorities, they've strategically decided not to attack the US, etc.
If they wanted to make us a priority, and they still have the resources, it would not be that hard to commit fairly frequent attacks with 10+ dead in the US.