sounds like they are creating an international institution that will target terrorist funding and an institution for targeting the spreading of terrorism ideology.

That this is happening with so much more frequency badly incriminates Trump. The idiots just don't realize it heh.

I've seen urban used as a euphemism for black in sales or obliquely, but I've never seen it used directly to mean black

https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertsamah...are#.egOZv06Ow

But no, Trump's not dangerous because there are no nukes flying yet.

Yeah whenever I hear a phrase like "the progressives ruined that place" that's what people are generally referring to. An influx of black people and people of color, usually a thriving economy, and a declining/very low crime rate.

Trump literally giving the middle east leaders a pass for human rights violations in his speech. OMG.

Trump is the worst speaker of all time. His speech writers are barely literate.

He's not giving them a pass, he agrees with thier views of women's and gay rights.

And projecting a free pass onto himself.

Funny how his message totally changes when his audience is white racists at his nazi rallies.

that room hes speaking in is pretty decent tbh

Lots of happy people in that crowd lol.

Pence isn't any less authoritarian than Trump
http://www.shakesville.com/2017/03/n...so-no-way.html

They have a TON of money. Which is probably 1000% why he chose to go there first.

EDIT: The negatoid news media (not Fox) will now expose how much he pocketed from this trip. (besides Ivanka's cool 100 mill)

It's all just a joke to this guy.


https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/866304387051917314

Unspeakable Realities Block Universal Health Coverage In America

hes not doing too bad in this speech tbh

edit: maybe, potentially

Like half of his audience are state sponsors of terrorism. This is a giant **** festival smokescreen.

lol ethnithisity. Mush mouthed dolt.

What a coward.

We've been giving Saudi Arabia a pass for their human rights abuses for nearly 20 years. That's part of the quid pro quo. They take care of Yemen and we look the other way when they oppress their people.

There is a HUGE difference though. Previous presidents did not fully support the oppression. This one does.

Did Obama under similar arrangements call out Saudi specifically for oppressing women?

Not sure what we can demand since trump did talk about oppressin of women, but i think it was in relation to isis.

We are to believe the pussy grabber in chief is a huge supporter of women's rights as he tries to gut women's healthcare both in America and abroad.

**** him and **** everyone who says one good thing about him or his disgusting speech.

I don't think that has the Yemen part right. They want Yemen taken care of a lot more than we do. It's oil and arms sales we want, but we don't look the other way.

The US and UK set up banana republics in the ME. As rich as the few Saudis and Kuwaitis ever got there still less money kept in their countries than if they control the resources. In 1953 we overthrew the elected government in Iran because they wanted to nationalize oil companies. In 1991 we destroyed Iraq's military because they threatened the oil of a banana republic. In the Gulf we have maintained either direct control of every country or propped up fundamentalist totalitarian monarchies since before WW1.

It's hard to characterize this as giving anyone a pass. It's our system. Exploitation and the required repression are features, not bugs.