Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

05-17-2017 , 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Tsk, tsk....I thought your party was the party of personal responsibility.
We tried. Agent Orange wiped out the 59 other real Republicans who were infinitely more qualified.
05-17-2017 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Umm...Russia is not an ally. They are allies with Syria (which we just bombed) and Iran. Iran wants to destroy Israel, which is allies with the US.

Try to keep up.
when someone is this massively uninformed it's no surprise they support trump
05-17-2017 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
TROOF





Also this basically confirms the Comey memo.

Imagine going through life with one-half the intelligence of Donald
Wow, that is almost unbelievable. Has to one of the dumbest Tweets in the last 24 hours, and that's saying something.
05-17-2017 , 12:26 PM
Herein is where we encounter the problem with 'democracy' as we know it. You're all correct in wanting to assign blame to Republicans a la "feckless" "cowards". Almost each and every one of them knows something is egregiously wrong here and almost each and every one is doing nothing about it. But what is the key word in their title? It's obv 'representative.' If most people in their district are not riotous about the recent turn of events - in fact - if most outright deny the reality of current events, then R pols apathy and denial is not only wholly allowed, it's actually in line with the way democracy is supposed to work.

The fundamental issue here goes back to the Einbert post I quoted, which is that America has become ridiculously polarized to the point where Person A in the South and Person B in the West can't even agree to what 2+2 is equal to. Republicans are living in an alternate reality that threatens every tenet of democracy as we know it
05-17-2017 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
You know exactly what I mean. Stop nitpicking.
Whether Russia is a friend or foe is not a small detail! Fox and Trumpeters are having a lot of trouble with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
If the truth comes out that Trump did indeed provide the Russians with details about things to watch out for, how is that any different than when Russia warned us about the Tsarnaev brothers in 2011, well before the Boston Marathon bombing?
The difference is we have a system for sharing intel that Trump didn't follow, which is going to cost us future intel from good allies (not Russia), expose operations, and possibly cost lives.
05-17-2017 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Iran wants to destroy Israel.
Lol. Keep believing that.
05-17-2017 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFS
How many times have we said "OK, this time he MUST have crossed the actual line!" and been wrong? Until he loses the support of enough people to **** up elections in the legislative branch, taking into account gerrymandering and voter suppression, there's no way anything really happens. Legal admissibility aside, Trump voters be like "LOL memos gtfo".
It was the same **** in the lead up to the election about how much of a lock HRC was. Everybody has their bubble.

And, obviously, this bubble is nowhere comparable to the Fox/Right-Wing bubble that exists these days.
05-17-2017 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
I've said some cringeworthy things here over the last decade, but I don't think this is one of them.



Just to be sure, I went through the trouble of searching my post history to confirm. The only two cases of me participating in impeachment discussions are in a thread about impeaching GWB for war crimes, and one this year about Trump.











I did vote for Trump, and I also believe I drank the Bernie kool-aid during the primaries that the Clinton e-mail scandal would sink her and result in charges. But pearl clutching? ehhhhhh not so much. I just thought HRC was a terrible person in general, and that Bernie would've been a hilarious slam-dunk loss for the dems in the general.



However, I do find it amusing that your average democrat internet hero who was okay with HRC having an open door for 6 years to classified government data in the form of her private e-mail server is now going out of their minds over the unconfirmed possibility of POTUS sharing anti-terrorism details with an ally.


Unconfirmed. Just shut the **** up.
05-17-2017 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
I've said some cringeworthy things here over the last decade, but I don't think this is one of them.



Just to be sure, I went through the trouble of searching my post history to confirm. The only two cases of me participating in impeachment discussions are in a thread about impeaching GWB for war crimes, and one this year about Trump.











I did vote for Trump, and I also believe I drank the Bernie kool-aid during the primaries that the Clinton e-mail scandal would sink her and result in charges. But pearl clutching? ehhhhhh not so much. I just thought HRC was a terrible person in general, and that Bernie would've been a hilarious slam-dunk loss for the dems in the general.



However, I do find it amusing that your average democrat internet hero who was okay with HRC having an open door for 6 years to classified government data in the form of her private e-mail server is now going out of their minds over the unconfirmed possibility of POTUS sharing anti-terrorism details with an ally.


Also. Russia isn't an ally. Shut the **** up.
05-17-2017 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeroDeniro
Lol. Keep believing that.
Destroy is a harsh word but when you are dealing with people like Inso, you need to be blunt to get the point across. Dude literally thinks the US and Russia are BFF's because his daddy said so.
05-17-2017 , 12:39 PM
Looks like demanding Comey's notes on Loretta Lynch is a winning trial balloon - based on Chiefsplanet. They sure do hate Loretta Lynch. Susan Rice too. If you can ever bring either one of those into a story chiefsplanet's hair immediately catches fire.

Trying to think of a unifying feature or two between them...
05-17-2017 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilu7
Herein is where we encounter the problem with 'democracy' as we know it. You're all correct in wanting to assign blame to Republicans a la "feckless" "cowards". Almost each and every one of them knows something is egregiously wrong here and almost each and every one is doing nothing about it. But what is the key word in their title? It's obv 'representative.' If most people in their district are not riotous about the recent turn of events - in fact - if most outright deny the reality of current events, then R pols apathy and denial is not only wholly allowed, it's actually in line with the way democracy is supposed to work.

The fundamental issue here goes back to the Einbert post I quoted, which is that America has become ridiculously polarized to the point where Person A in the South and Person B in the West can't even agree to what 2+2 is equal to. Republicans are living in an alternate reality that threatens every tenet of democracy as we know it
You are largely correct that paradoxically, the GOP is fundamentally respecting a form of democracy by channeling their voters undemocratic desires into action. I've made similar points in the last week or ****, 6 months about this very thing. If ~40% of people simply have no value for norms and these people tend to be more powerful and better able to impact the system then you have no norms at all. The whole preening about norms and shared values seems like the Great Liberal Blindspot of the early 21st century and how we unwind to this point. Democrats are hyper defensive and respectful of fictions only they believe.

From last week in the Fire Comey thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Since we're getting deep and introspective here I think it's important to grasp, as you probably do, that this is a moment decades in the making. I've made the point before here that you find the root causes of our growing social isolation and economic disparities in policies that extend back 40 or 50 years, or in some cases all the way back to the Civil War.

But while I'm sure this explanation will be considered still somewhat distant, I find the *proximate* big-factor cause to ultimately be migration and specificaly the Great Migration of blacks out of the south and into the North and urban areas, starting around the 1920s but continuing past WWII.

From that point forward, and mixed in with huge levels of migration from Central and South America, American politcal leadership largely did not deal with or meaningfully address integration even if some critical statutory civil rights gains were made. From that point forward, with both the mass migration of racial minorities PLUS the lack of politcal will to meaningfully deal with integration -- the groundwork for all of this was building. We're living in world with growing social and economic stratification, and the persecution mentality and oppositional cutlure seen throughout the right-wing (see its paranoia, its anger, its devotion to Fox News and personality cults like Trump) are all artifacts of these large-scale conditions. The reflexively angry, reactive nature of the old white who only knows the world via Fox News is the result of living largely only surrounded by other whites and a failure of civic institutions to meaningfully integrate or address changing social and economic realities such that these people feel largely dispossesed and foreign to the modern world and economy for reasons they can't even articulate but are channeled through Fox News type punditry.

Predicting the future is hard. I am not hopeless. But I am confident this precise problem has to be solved.

On the good news front, I think we can point to historical parallels to this moment (and I have in the past) that got sorted out without revolution or staggering amounts of violence. The 1880s-1910s in the United States (and Europe too, actually) come to mind. Although I think popular history discounts how much street violence and social unrest there was during the transition from the Gilded Age to the Progressive Era.

On the bad news front, this book is very apt here and I just finished it. It's by Stanford historian Walt Scheidel. And his basic argument is that the greatest leveler of growing inequality throughout most of human history is actually violence and calamity and society's ability to peacefully extricate itself from these sorts of feedback loops is very hard.
I do think the US is in a bad place. I'm not saying it's intractable. But I am arguing that the normal process of political pluralism and compromise and relying on norms may not be effective, those norms are largely eroded, vestiges of the immediate post WWII system and the Cold War menace. Most critically: they are no longer norms. That's maybe the biggest take-away people should take from Trump. He isn't tearing down the norms; his presence at the head of our governing institutions is a clear demonstration the norms are already eroded, gone, discarded.

That like many times in history, the ultimate course correction or leveler may simply be some kind of external factor or calamity. Even cases when these sorts of movements of hyper segregation, alienation, disparity and strife atrophied and wound themselves down peaceably and without revolution (e.g., 1880-1920), there was still actually a lot of violence and trauma and strife. Trump is a buffoon and an oaf but consider that Harding once credibly threatened to bomb West Virginia coal miners who were on strike. America ain't always been Tip n Ronnie bipartisan consensus common sense shared wisdom Sorkin narratives, it's often been violent and toxic and angry, full of people and factions and parties that wanted to dominate and kill each other before they dare considered compromise and pluralism. Or simply did. It's been highlighted by commentators and authors, mostly black, but I thought that SNL sketch with Chappelle right after Trump was elected maybe captured it best: there's a whole heckuva lot of white privilege underlying deep anxieties about Trump and our institutions, and being threatened with authortarianism and jackbooted injustice has been simply part of life for many Americans forever.

Last edited by DVaut1; 05-17-2017 at 12:52 PM.
05-17-2017 , 12:42 PM
Look you guys, trump is basically feeding intel directly to ISIS, which must have been his secret plan to destroy them all along. What's the problem here?

/inso
05-17-2017 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0

However, I do find it amusing that your average democrat internet hero who was okay with HRC having an open door for 6 years to classified government data in the form of her private e-mail server is now going out of their minds over the unconfirmed possibility of POTUS sharing anti-terrorism details with an ally.
Speaking of cringe worthy, this has been shown to be false over and over again.

Like dude, when it comes to the email thing your side got it WRONG, continues to get it WRONG, and seems to want to go on getting it WRONG.

The email story is bull****. You got played. End of story.
05-17-2017 , 12:47 PM
This is a pretty interesting case study in political maneuvering. I would imagine close to 100% of GOP politicians would want Pence > Trump, all things being equal. As has been mentioned here before, they could pass their terrible policy things (maybe even get LGBT rights rollbacks!!) without the drama. Problem is the deplorables will very likely stop voting for them and at least 50% of the GOP needs the deplorables on their side. Then the fact that if he's impeached they are completely f'd in 18 for image reasons as well as the voting reasons. So what is the breaking point? I'm guessing it's going to be a broken dam situation where one of these spineless ****s in leadership finally breaks rank then they all go in and leak a bunch of personal Trump stuff to the media in hopes of being able to say "it was just Trump!!!"

Anyways, this is going to be fun. Every 12 hours we get a story that would carry on for 6 months+ on FOX if it was Obama.
05-17-2017 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
do you idiots really think that trump is gonna get impeached.
Maybe? I mean, it's certainly possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
the gop has all the power and anyone that flips on him can kiss their political career goodbye
Not really. Him being impeached is dependent on him reaching a point where the GOP decides impeaching him is better for them politically than not impeaching him. He may not be far from that point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
maybe you guys didn't learn during the election when the corporate media told you hillary wins 99% of the time, they don't have your interests in mind.
Okay? I mean, sure, I agree, they have they own interests in mind all the time, but what does that have to do with models that predicted Hillary had 99% to win. I mean:

1) Those models may not have been wrong, although I am more inclined to believe that Nate Silver's model which had her at ~82%.
2) How does "the corporate media" benefit from inflating Hillary's win probability? If anything, it seems like they would benefit from it being closer to 50/50.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
How come when bush and obama were busy war mongering and violating our constitution their were ignoring this and singing their praises
Uh noone was singing Bush's praises (I mean Fox, sure) broski.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
yet Trump can't eat an extra scoop of ice cream without being judged. You guys are so thick to still trust these ******* talking heads on cnn and msnbc and fox
It's because Trump is a moron.
05-17-2017 , 12:49 PM
This is a thread OP in chiefsplanet:

Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief
My personal Op-Ed...

I think the noose is closing... not around the Trump administration and the alleged "collusion" with Russia, but around the former administration and the intelligence communities and their surveillance of campaigns, congress, and possibly even SCOTUS. This is why so many of these stories have former officials or intelligience officials as sources. They need to keep the narrative on Russia and "collusion" as a distraction. The unmasking of names, and the ability to intercept any foreign communication gave them an open door to abuse their powers. The noose will tighten when and if the biased press finally realize that these sources are not reliable. I believed Comey was fired for many things, but one was his lack of enthusiasm to investigate the leaks and unmasking. These are the "only" actual crimes that have shown to be committed. The shoes are dropping, just not on those who the media currently wants you to think they are dropping.
05-17-2017 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
This is a thread OP in chiefsplanet:
05-17-2017 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
You know exactly what I mean. Stop nitpicking.

If the truth comes out that Trump did indeed provide the Russians with details about things to watch out for, how is that any different than when Russia warned us about the Tsarnaev brothers in 2011, well before the Boston Marathon bombing?

But again, all of this is speculation.
Oh and look, you're WRONG again.

It wasn't the information itself that he gave them that was the problem, it was in the details of how and where it was collected. Doing so burned a highly placed asset, belonging to another friendly nation (most likely either Israel or Jordan), and that nation specifically didn't want their involvement exposed to the Russians.

Russia now has leverage over that nation. Hey do what we want and we'll burn your source to ISIS and they'll behead him. Plus the info he/she had been providing to you will be cut off and your country/citizens will become less safe/die as a result.

Trump is a f*ck up. Case closed.
05-17-2017 , 12:53 PM
Like how do you have a conversation with someone so dumb
05-17-2017 , 12:53 PM
pretty sure its confirmed that israel was the source
05-17-2017 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
How can you guys stay so perpetually pumped up knowing these "bombshells" always lead to disappointment?

Aren't you totally exhausted after 4 months of this?
From the party of

The birth certificate
Benghazi
IRS questionaires
Using personal email for work
Solyndra
Fast and Furious
The New Black Panthers
ACORN

and an entire media ecosystem that keeps lawnmowers airborne 24/7 with **** like the knockout game, the War on ****ing Christmas, and many more.

You can kinda see how this criticism doesn't seem like it's being made in good faith.
05-17-2017 , 12:56 PM
05-17-2017 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
It's not a mystery. It's the answer shining in neon blinking lights. Trump never bats an eye when it comes to demeaning and tearing down anyone who gets in his way or crosses him. Not high ranking republicans. Not high ranking democrats. Not a sitting president. Not a war hero. Not a gold star family. Not a disabled reporter. Not the CIA. Not the DOJ. And not the head of the FBI. But who's the ONE group he's never uttered a single bad word about? Wait for it.... Why, it's RUSSIA! Putin. Flynn. Manafort, et.al and anyone having anything to do with Russia.

Call me silly, but that leads me to believe there might be something damning that they're hiding. The question is whether there enough republicans who are not so morally bankrupt slime bags that are willing to put country before party. I'm not so sure such creatures exist. This isn't like the Nixon era. We can only hope that somewhere, there are enough republicans who find their spines and do the right thing.
This post reads like it was imported from two months ago.
05-17-2017 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
pretty sure its confirmed that israel was the source
That could be disinformation to protect the Jordanians. They help the US a lot with intelligence gathering but they don't like anyone to know it.

      
m