Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
The main thing to realize is that because Trump could have conceivably saved the lives of 200 or so innocent airline passengers, they will forgive his technical error, especially given that others in the room said it was no big deal and that Israel is stating the same thing (whether they mean it or not.) To pile on at this point is bad strategy.
Look, I think piling on at this point isn't so much *bad* strategy in that the electorate is likely to give Trump the benefits of the doubt so much as it's unlikely the criticism will land hard because most people simply don't care.
But surely even half-wits can understand the idea that Trump could: 1) inform Russia or whoever else of ISIS plots to blow up airlines with laptops and 2) that doesn't require divulging intelligence assets (e.g., people, methods, how the detail was acquired). That's not complex.
I don't understand this line of reasoning. What Trump is accused of doing isn't so much hard to understand; my take is that people don't give a **** about the sanctity of foreign intelligence and so simply don't care. So I think Democrats are going to make it a struggle for people to *care* but not understand the mistake. Trump's mistake is trivial to understand -- presumably in his bluster and rush to impress the Russians, he revealed too much about how he knew what he knew. You seem to be arguing the criticism won't hurt Trump because people won't quite grasp the error but I don't think it's that hard to understand, even for morons. What your average idiot will struggle with is understanding why they should care that much about foreign intelligence assets.