Quote:
Basically Trump is exposing all the cracks in our system of checks and balances. And it turns out that when two branches are completely intent on exploiting and destroying those systems rather than remaining faithful to the old norms, they crumble like a house of cards.
I do think we should be a little more defensive and deferential to the Founders here. The thing we probably have to grapple with is that checks and balances weren't meant to inculcate civic virtue in the populous; it wasn't meant to endear people to democracy, to develop respect for democracy and its institutions. That was always on us.
No one who designed say the three co-equal branches of government (a bit of a polite fiction anyway) meant that if like some huge percentage of the population embraced dogmatic right-wing authoritarianism and elected a President and big majorities in Congress who wanted a government focused on populist authoritarian white resentment that they couldn't necessarily have that.
Yet again I think the whole "exposed the cracks of our systems of checks and balances" is a bit of a sleight of hand. Trump shows that
the norms don't exist the way liberals thought. Checks and balances weren't meant to protect important fictions. Again, that was on us. It's not so much a systemic failure or a design flaw in the system; these are pretty transparent user errors. We inherited a system that worked well enough for literally centuries and to the extent it's being dismantled it's simply because very few people value it and want it. If you explained the situation to Madison and Hamilton and John Jay or whoever, they would probably nod along and say it's a shame but they didn't design the system to persist when lots of people fundamentally don't respect it. I don't think you would get them to apologize for a miss or a flaw in the system. They would rightfully probably look around at things like Trump and the obstinate GOP Congress who refuses to do nothing and say welp, you're on your own, gl. Garbage in garbage out.
This whole debate reminds me of people in fundamentally failing business (e.g., newspaper publishing) blaming their old legacy systems or something which calculate delivery routes or formats the layout of the front page. Software can't make you money on its own, your products do that. Our constitutional system of checks and balances doesn't simply respect and cherish itself, that's on our culture and society to preserve. Failure to do that is not a failure with the design of the system.
Last edited by DVaut1; 05-13-2017 at 02:28 PM.