Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

05-09-2017 , 02:23 PM
Also voter suppression is one of my main arguments to counter both:

[ ] Both parties are the same
[ ] Voting doesn't make a difference
-----------------
Interesting footnote: even today in this age of vicious minority voter suppression, I've heard people phrase the second as "If voting changed anything they wouldn't let you do it."
05-09-2017 , 02:30 PM
I think heavy on gotv and helping people overcome voter suppression might be a more productive use of resources than trying to convince people who is right. Do that before gotv efforts are illegal.
05-09-2017 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Have they even said what this is ostensibly trying to prevent? Like, you are allowed to fly out of an American airport to a (potentially) scary airport like Charles De Gualle with your laptop, and you can fly back with your laptop in your checked luggage. So the threat is...laptop bombs that can only be triggered in the user's hands and that would make it through CDG security but not JFK?
There may be brown people on the flights back.

That's pretty much the reasoning.
05-09-2017 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
I think heavy on gotv and helping people overcome voter suppression might be a more productive use of resources than trying to convince people who is right. Do that before gotv efforts are illegal.
I think the GTO play is for Democrats to come out in favor of voter ID, and to offer full support if it is automatically given to people when they turn 18, it's easy to sign up and get ID later, it can be done online with scanned documents, there are offices open like 8a-8p mon-sat for a month leading up to the deadline to register, you have the option to register to vote when you renew your license, and it's all at no cost to voters.

Republicans would HATE that idea, and it would put them in a tough place politically where their only argument would be, "People will fraudulently sign up online."

I guess that convinces the olds, but with everything that you can do online in 2017, I don't think that argument holds up with a good chunk of people under 50 - even Republicans.
05-09-2017 , 02:49 PM
My most effective means for influencing still existing trump supporters is not to go after trump at all. Instead I couch my anti trump positions as being the fault of congress. There is pretty nobody who is a fan of congress.

This allows you to find common ground on issues with someone who might otherways knee jerk oppose if you bring up trump. Once you meet in this middle area of congress wanting to do bad or dumb things you can carefully expand the discourse to demonstrate trump also supports that bad view.

I have found this to be fairly effective to at least get always trump supporters at least start questioning some things.
05-09-2017 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuluck414
There may be brown people on the flights back.

That's pretty much the reasoning.
But the brown people could fly from CDG to JFK with their evil brown laptops checked, and then whip them out for the flight home.
05-09-2017 , 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
But the brown people could fly from CDG to JFK with their evil brown laptops checked, and then whip them out for the flight home.
That's one to many levels deep for this administration.
05-09-2017 , 03:00 PM


Dude you don't need to hire a lawyer for that it's like $3 at the post office
05-09-2017 , 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf


Dude you don't need to hire a lawyer for that it's like $3 at the post office
A DC law firm? They do still have a White House Counsel, right?
05-09-2017 , 03:10 PM
Going to answer my own question here... You probably can't pay the White House Counsel extra to commit perjury. Gotta go into the private sector free markets #USA1 for that.
05-09-2017 , 03:11 PM
Press briefing went way too good for the administration. The media sucked at questions today. They didn't call out Trump's huge Flynn lying at all, and like half the reporters got duped into asking about Afghanistan. The reentry to Afghan announcement yesterday was nothing more than a possible maybe, and was very obviously timed to steal headlines away from Yates & Flynn.
05-09-2017 , 03:12 PM
Think the guy who runs my local beer store also does notarizations for $5 a pop.
05-09-2017 , 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
I think the GTO play is for Democrats to come out in favor of voter ID, and to offer full support if it is automatically given to people when they turn 18, it's easy to sign up and get ID later, it can be done online with scanned documents, there are offices open like 8a-8p mon-sat for a month leading up to the deadline to register, you have the option to register to vote when you renew your license, and it's all at no cost to voters.

Republicans would HATE that idea, and it would put them in a tough place politically where their only argument would be, "People will fraudulently sign up online."

I guess that convinces the olds, but with everything that you can do online in 2017, I don't think that argument holds up with a good chunk of people under 50 - even Republicans.
Fancy Play Syndrome. Come out in favor of automatic voter registration, same day voting, weekend voting, ending the electoral college, ending gerrymandering. Get people to see the deeper systemic flaws in the system, you can't fix anything by papering over it with compromises with Republicans.
05-09-2017 , 03:18 PM
Oregon adopts nation's first automatic voter registration law
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/oregon-a...istration-law/
Quote:
Seventeen years after Oregon decided to become the first state to hold all elections with mail-in ballots, it took another pioneering step on Monday to broaden participation by automatically registering people to vote.

Gov. Kate Brown signed a bill that puts the burden of registration on the state instead of voters.

Under the legislation, every adult citizen in Oregon who has interacted with the Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division since 2013 but hasn't registered to vote will receive a ballot in the mail at least 20 days before the next statewide election. The measure is expected to add about 300,000 new voters to the rolls.

"It just changes expectations for who's responsible for making elections work," said Barry Burden, a professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin in Madison and director of the Elections Research Center. "In every other state it's the responsibility for the voters to make sure it happens."

Some other states have considered such legislation but none has gone as far as Oregon.

Minnesota nearly implemented automatic voter registration in 2009 before the plan was vetoed by Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who said "registering to vote should be a voluntary, intentional act."
A big problem for Democrats is they don't strongly enough call this stuff out for what it is: intentionally racist voter suppression. They want to keep "decorum with their Senate colleagues" or whatever the ****, meanwhile the Secretary of State for Alabama is meeting with the Wetumpka Tea Party in a few weeks. You think they're going to be talking about how to compromise with liberals? No. They're going to be talking about how to crush the black electorate by completely disenfranchising them in the state.
05-09-2017 , 03:32 PM
Republicans Party Like It’s 1984
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/08/o...its-1984.html?
05-09-2017 , 03:40 PM
I'm not getting excited about that voter suppression study till it has been reviewed by someone reliable.
05-09-2017 , 04:06 PM
I've posted Ur-Fascism's clip on DoubleSpeak so many times. They're deep into it at this point.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/
Quote:
14. Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak. Newspeak was invented by Orwell, in 1984, as the official language of Ingsoc, English Socialism. But elements of Ur-Fascism are common to different forms of dictatorship. All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning. But we must be ready to identify other kinds of Newspeak, even if they take the apparently innocent form of a popular talk show.
in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning
05-09-2017 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Going to answer my own question here... You probably can't pay the White House Counsel extra to commit perjury. Gotta go into the private sector free markets #USA1 for that.
Presidents don't have attorney-client privilege with the White House Counsel. I know this because I watch The West Wing.
05-09-2017 , 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thug Bubbles
Presidents don't have attorney-client privilege with the White House Counsel. I know this because I watch The West Wing.
Good point. Should be easy to attack him on this... "Hey Mr. President, why do you need attorney-client privilege if there's nothing going on with Russia?"

Piece of cake, so I trust that Democrats will drop the ball.
05-09-2017 , 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Fancy Play Syndrome. Come out in favor of automatic voter registration, same day voting, weekend voting, ending the electoral college, ending gerrymandering. Get people to see the deeper systemic flaws in the system, you can't fix anything by papering over it with compromises with Republicans.
None of that will happen federally in the next 10-15 years. The suggestion I made might slow down the voter suppression by getting Republicans to back off a little to avoid bad optics. Literally, our best case scenario right now is slowing down, not stopping, the disgusting and unjust suppression of minority votes. Unless some conservatives on SCOTUS rule against the Republicans.
05-09-2017 , 04:55 PM
Some dems are also fans of voter suppression.
05-09-2017 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
None of that will happen federally in the next 10-15 years. The suggestion I made might slow down the voter suppression by getting Republicans to back off a little to avoid bad optics. Literally, our best case scenario right now is slowing down, not stopping, the disgusting and unjust suppression of minority votes. Unless some conservatives on SCOTUS rule against the Republicans.
It can happen and we have to be the party of imagination.
05-09-2017 , 05:44 PM


Bye Felicia?
05-09-2017 , 05:49 PM
OH MY GOD!
05-09-2017 , 05:50 PM
Good thing he pinned that tweet about not being guilty in his twitter banner, otherwise he would look guilty. He's thinking so many moves ahead.

      
m