Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

05-05-2017 , 04:29 PM
Wow. Can't believe the far left position of the righties ITT. somone (aka the government) needs to step in and make rational cost effective decisions about health care including an economic consideration of the value of extending life.

It logically then goes to food and wealth distribution- although we could go down the path of lets just kill all the non contributing members of society (as well as take from the rich).

I think overpopulation is a huge problem in the world. I just don't think there is a practical or ethical way to control it-who gets to decide. The planet will eventually shake off a huge number due to disease or natural disaster if we don't do it to ourselves by war or famine.

I'd just rather let Mother Nature decide than some government official or Bond villain.
05-05-2017 , 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
trump trumpeting gorsuch as an accomplishment is like playing HORSE against the spoiled rich kid in the neighborhood, and when it's his turn he gets his lackeys to lower the basket to 4 feet, sinks one, and makes a huge deal of celebrating
Seriously.

Trump was handed a list of about two dozen people pre-approved by The Heritage Foundation, then picked one with a Senate prepared to go nuke the filibuster. A 5 year old could have done that.
05-05-2017 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by danspartan
I know. We could use something called "death panels" to decide who lives and who lives and who dies.
the republicans, not unreasonably, do NOT want the government in charge of deciding when to cut off health care. however they're ok with letting the so-called free market decide tho. basically republicans consider human life, even american citizens, a commodity to be bought and sold by capitalists
05-05-2017 , 05:02 PM
less than 9% of the House Republican delegation is women. LOL women's health rights.

32% of the Dem delegation is women.
05-05-2017 , 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ligastar
less than 9% of the House Republican delegation is women. LOL women's health rights.

32% of the Dem delegation is women.
It's self-hatred to support this and be a woman.

Hell, it's self-hatred to support this unless you're part of a 1%.
05-05-2017 , 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Is this the largest reverse income redistribution in US history?
Nah, that was TARP, and it's not close.
05-05-2017 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkubus
Nah, that was TARP, and it's not close.
Wasn't TARP "only" about $700B while this is closer to $1T?
05-05-2017 , 05:16 PM
TARP actually had a purpose and the loans were laid back, this is a fist ****ing
05-05-2017 , 05:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
He changed the bill to satisfy the Freedom Caucus and the moderates caved
Why would the moderates side with Trump on such a controversial bill? This type of stuff will just result result in it being a dem sweep in 4 years, no?

Sick people just can't die for 4 years I guess
05-05-2017 , 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
It's self-hatred to support this and be a woman.

Hell, it's self-hatred to support this unless you're part of a 1%.
I'm part of the 1% and I'm ****ing enraged. Poor women voting for this clown makes me want to give up. I know why they vote the way they do, but sometimes it's really hard to be their advocate.
05-05-2017 , 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stinkubus
Nah, that was TARP, and it's not close.
Without TARP we would have had a depression. A really bad one. And all the money was repaid. This is the murder of ordinary people to make rich people richer.
05-05-2017 , 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
Good thing no one said that, be less dishonest einbert.
Rich coming from the guy that just accused 4 others of being anti-vaxxers. Should we play "cite or ban" with that one, Dan?
05-05-2017 , 05:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Wasn't TARP "only" about $700B while this is closer to $1T?
Ended up being $426 billion.
05-05-2017 , 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Honestly, it makes sense to get the high-risk patients off of the individual market. That will enable 95% of the other customers to have cheaper health insurance. They could have used the 3.9 and 0.9 taxes to fully fund the high risk pools. But it's a GOP bill so but nahhh.

Honestly I see the waste around me at work. One patient, terminal case, using $$$$$$ of resources and we could use those resources to cover thousands of others. We wouldn't treat our own pets the way we treat our NICU babies and ICU adults.

So many docs think they can play God and fix what cannot be fixed. So much false hope given to family to get them to agree to churn the patient in the medical health complex.
Having worked in an icu it is not the doctors thinking they can play god. I have been a part of many family meetings where the doctors point blank tell them theres no hope. Families are the ones driving last ditch efforts.

Conversely, babies in the nicu will make miraculous recoveries and should always have the kitchen sink thrown at them.
05-05-2017 , 05:56 PM
The oddest thing about healthcare from a Non-American perspective is how you all talk about it like it's an intractable problem when in fact the rest of the first world solved it long ago.
05-05-2017 , 05:57 PM
Nah, we know that. Follow the money for an explanation.
05-05-2017 , 05:57 PM
Can I put in a euro requesting cliffs request?
05-05-2017 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
Nah, we know that. Follow the money for an explanation.
Chiefsplanet it literally incapable of knowing that UHC isn't some crazy brave new world US experiment. When pointed out to them they mutter something about gangbangers and wait times and instantly forget the conversation.
05-05-2017 , 06:01 PM
you get stoned in america if you talk about raising muh taxes though
05-05-2017 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1
Can I put in a euro requesting cliffs request?
lol America
05-05-2017 , 06:03 PM
Trump isn't about to stop at healthcare either. Let's not fool ourselves into thinking this is some sort of one off event. He is constantly patrolling (Obama's) government programs, looking for loose change that he and the other scumbags can pocket. A trillion from the middle class here, 500 billion from the poor there. And they're being completely obvious about it. No, worse. They're yucking it up and celebrating with white sheets and bud light. **** them hard.

Please baby Jesus let there be a way to stop the bleeding and put him away with the other rapists.
05-05-2017 , 06:03 PM
Immigrants aren't ruining America. We're doing a perfectly good job of that all by ourselves.
05-05-2017 , 06:07 PM
05-05-2017 , 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmo
Having worked in an icu it is not the doctors thinking they can play god. I have been a part of many family meetings where the doctors point blank tell them theres no hope. Families are the ones driving last ditch efforts.

Conversely, babies in the nicu will make miraculous recoveries and should always have the kitchen sink thrown at them.
Having been through this a couple of times with elderly family members, I think there is a problem with the way options are presented to families. It seems like the default is put them on a ventilator, put in a feeding tube, etc. This goes on for a week or two, until finally the family decides to do the humane thing. Nobody wants to be the one to write off grandma. If the hospital staff had said right from the beginning, "Look, at her age with her health issues, she's not going to be coming back from this. Pursuing further treatment would only prolong her suffering", I think these things would end much more quickly on average. Instead, they make it out that the default with a 94 year old stroke victim with pneumonia is to wait and see what happens. It seems like the no hope conversation happens way too late in the process.
05-05-2017 , 06:13 PM
I still say Canada's approach of executing everyone over 65 works best

      
m