Quote:
Originally Posted by HastenDan
I am curious the thoughts of those that advocate for using massive resources and funding to support the life of a 90 year old terminal patient if it means those funds are not going towards supporting children with cancer?
I mean I am for an entire overhaul of the US healthcare industry and UHC, but when it comes to allocation of resources, his argument seems fairly clear and all anyone can say is WHY WOULD YOU LET SOMEONE DIE! without actually facing the realities of scarcity and allocation under our current system.
Behold, Dan makes solid, cogent point.
Don't forget, every decade there are more, and more expensive ways (and also more effective, cheaper ways), to intervene and prolong life.