You all so realize that I get to vote again in 2018 to kick all the bastards out. And 2020. And 2022.
Why would you vote them out, they are doing what they said they'd do, they are doing exactly and precisely the **** that got you to vote for them in the first place!
So my wife had a c-section. How does that effect us going forward if we are in a red state? Before Obamacare, it was basically impossible for my wife to get health insurance that wasn't horrible because of said c-section.
Here's the thing Clovis. I repeatedly stated that I thought the AHCA sucks. That removing the 3.8 and 0.9 percent taxes on the rich suck. I am no cheerleader for that bill.
You like to spew anger on things I don't even support.
You voted for Trump knowing he was going to repeal the income tax laws that favor rich people and he was going to repeal Obamacare
Most everything is going to be a preexisting condition after this becomes law. Almost noone will be able to get good insurance, maybe people with lots of income in very blue states will.
So my wife had a c-section. How does that effect us going forward if we are in a red state? Before Obamacare, it was basically impossible for my wife to get health insurance that wasn't horrible because of said c-section.
Thanks!
Rejoyce that now you have the FREEDOM to be uninsured due to your inability to afford insurance
If this sounds harsh, it is the actual GOP argument
So my wife had a c-section. How does that effect us going forward if we are in a red state? Before Obamacare, it was basically impossible for my wife to get health insurance that wasn't horrible because of said c-section.
Thanks!
I think (and could be wrong) that so long as you don't have a gap in coverage, then because of hippa you won't actually have to admit the pre existing condition? But I'm not 100%
Why would you vote them out, they are doing what they said they'd do, they are doing exactly and precisely the **** that got you to vote for them in the first place!
If his taxes go up, they will not be doing what he voted for.
Honestly, it makes sense to get the high-risk patients off of the individual market. That will enable 95% of the other customers to have cheaper health insurance. They could have used the 3.9 and 0.9 taxes to fully fund the high risk pools. But it's a GOP bill so but nahhh.
Honestly I see the waste around me at work. One patient, terminal case, using $$$$$$ of resources and we could use those resources to cover thousands of others. We wouldn't treat our own pets the way we treat our NICU babies and ICU adults.
So many docs think they can play God and fix what cannot be fixed. So much false hope given to family to get them to agree to churn the patient in the medical health complex.
Honestly, it makes sense to get the high-risk patients off of the individual market. That will enable 95% of the other customers to have cheaper health insurance. They could have used the 3.9 and 0.9 taxes to fully fund the high risk pools. But it's a GOP bill so but nahhh.
Honestly I see the waste around me at work. One patient, terminal case, using $$$$$$ of resources and we could use those resources to cover thousands of others. We wouldn't treat our own pets the way we treat our NICU babies and ICU adults.
So many docs think they can play God and fix what cannot be fixed. So much false hope given to family to get them to agree to churn the patient in the medical health complex.
itt, awval advocating for letting the sick people die
Honestly, it makes sense to get the high-risk patients off of the individual market. That will enable 95% of the other customers to have cheaper health insurance. They could have used the 3.9 and 0.9 taxes to fully fund the high risk pools. But it's a GOP bill so but nahhh.
Yea, I definitely think there's an interesting discussion to be had about high risk pools vs large population subsidization. But when the funding is so paltry, it becomes clear that high risk pools are just being used as a cloak for eliminating affordable coverage.
Honestly, it makes sense to get the high-risk patients off of the individual market. That will enable 95% of the other customers to have cheaper health insurance. They could have used the 3.9 and 0.9 taxes to fully fund the high risk pools. But it's a GOP bill so but nahhh.
Honestly I see the waste around me at work. One patient, terminal case, using $$$$$$ of resources and we could use those resources to cover thousands of others. We wouldn't treat our own pets the way we treat our NICU babies and ICU adults.
So many docs think they can play God and fix what cannot be fixed. So much false hope given to family to get them to agree to churn the patient in the medical health complex.
What do you think should happen to the terminal patient? "**** you, it's time to die"?
itt, awval advocating for letting the sick people die
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Honestly, it makes sense to get the high-risk patients off of the individual market. That will enable 95% of the other customers to have cheaper health insurance. They could have used the 3.9 and 0.9 taxes to fully fund the high risk pools. But it's a GOP bill so but nahhh.
Honestly I see the waste around me at work. One patient, terminal case, using $$$$$$ of resources and we could use those resources to cover thousands of others. We wouldn't treat our own pets the way we treat our NICU babies and ICU adults.
So many docs think they can play God and fix what cannot be fixed. So much false hope given to family to get them to agree to churn the patient in the medical health complex.
Would you have him taken out the back door and left on the street? Euthanasia? I'm curious how this would work in practice.