Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

05-03-2017 , 08:36 PM
Wow. Read this again sober, dude.
05-03-2017 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
That's the thing for me tho is for you dead browns are "an issue" to me they are about the only issue because it's the one thing both sides agree on, which means it's a goddamn atrocity just like when we passed the drug abuse and prevention act in 1986 almost unanimously and it was a goddamn atrocity

No, one wants to kill families of terrorists, the other doesn't (tho will accept collateral damage, so isn't great)

If it is the only issue for you then you would be strongly against Trump (and Hillary, but again, she lost so is irrelevant now)
05-03-2017 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Sounds like Trump Derangement Syndrome there, Hillarybot!
Lolololol I demure you will thrash me. I don't agree with your politics much anymore but I still lmao at most of your posts you are one genuinely funny guy
05-03-2017 , 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
Interesting. Could you list the things that Bernie wanted to spend money on that you agreed with vs the list of things Hillary wanted to that you didn't?
It was almost 100% their differences on reforming the private prison -justice system monstrosity and ending our overseas conflicts Bernie talked about this extensively in his speeches and I really was transfixed by it. The iniquities in sentencing by race, ending the death penalty and ending drug prohibition are issues I'm extremely passionate about. All Hilary Clinton did was yell about guns and republicans but she wouldn't do anything about those issues just like Obama didn't . The only reform to the drug laws has been at the state level
05-03-2017 , 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Wow. Read this again sober, dude.
That could take a while 8-)
05-03-2017 , 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
??? Is it not possible for your brain to comprehend someone may not like Hilary Clinton OR Jeff sessions? Like how hyper partisan can you people be?

Tons of people dislike/hate both

But stop with the false equivalencies

I don't like bank robbers or rapists but the latter are much worse
05-03-2017 , 08:43 PM
Triple posting. Not something you see in P every day.

Or at least something I don't see.
05-03-2017 , 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
That's fair, I never claimed to be a liberal but I will definitely claim to be a radical social liberal, which is why it's funny to me to watch Fly the ultra liberal call me an anchor baby

You can't be a radical social liberal and defend this administration or call it "trump derangement syndrome" as he is doing horrible things that social liberals care about
05-03-2017 , 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
Do ANY of you have any other mode than savage anyone who did not vote for god-emperor Hilary? pathetic imo.
No because this opinion in may 2017 is epic stupidity.
05-03-2017 , 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholasp27
Tons of people dislike/hate both

But stop with the false equivalencies

I don't like bank robbers or rapists but the latter are much worse
Ya but you're telling me I should vote for a bank robber because the other guys a rapist (lol that was a convenient analogy to hijack). How about I don't vote for either scumbag just like I don't like bank robbers or rapists.
05-03-2017 , 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Triple posting. Not something you see in P every day.

Or at least something I don't see.
I'm positive I've done it more than twice here.
05-03-2017 , 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholasp27
You can't be a radical social liberal and defend this administration or call it "trump derangement syndrome" as he is doing horrible things that social liberals care about
Just mailed my check in to the ACLU today, what have you done to #resist lately?

Note: this is a euphimism, they have online pay available
05-03-2017 , 08:48 PM
I know this post will get buried in the mess right now, but does anybody know why Susan Rice declined the Senate invitation to testify? She has to have good reasons because the optics of it are really bad.
05-03-2017 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
It was almost 100% their differences on reforming the private prison -justice system monstrosity and ending our overseas conflicts Bernie talked about this extensively in his speeches and I really was transfixed by it. The iniquities in sentencing by race, ending the death penalty and ending drug prohibition are issues I'm extremely passionate about. All Hilary Clinton did was yell about guns and republicans but she wouldn't do anything about those issues just like Obama didn't . The only reform to the drug laws has been at the state level
You idiotic ****, Obama chose not to enforce federal drug laws in the way he could have, which gave states the space to make the reforms they did.
05-03-2017 , 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
You idiotic ****, Obama chose not to enforce federal drug laws in the way he could have, which gave states the space to make the reforms they did.
Is that all he could have done? Or the least he could get away with. He certainly didn't try to reform much in federal sentencing standards, etc. shot the whole wad on ****ty Obama care instead nice call IDIOT
05-03-2017 , 08:50 PM
Jules is the best argument against legal marijuana.
05-03-2017 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
Ya but you're telling me I should vote for a bank robber because the other guys a rapist (lol that was a convenient analogy to hijack). How about I don't vote for either scumbag just like I don't like bank robbers or rapists.

But you come in soft defending the rapist

Using "trump derangement syndrome" and saying they are the same is a form of soft defense for a poisonous wretched human being

Status quo may not be perfect or even great, but trump and his team are actively trying to build more private prisons

Obama actually ordered the federal govt to use less private prisons, which Sessions rescinded, yet you say Obama did nothing to help that situation

Trump wants to start up STOP AND FRISK nationwide, which will only make the racial disparity in prisons even worse

Sessions wants to actively go after marijuana


Both sides suck but one side sucks some and the other is actively trying to ruin the country and put as many minorities into corporate prisons and unable to vote as they can get away with
05-03-2017 , 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
Is that all he could have done? Or the least he could get away with. He certainly didn't try to reform much in federal sentencing standards, etc. shot the whole wad on ****ty Obama care instead nice call IDIOT
He accomplished more in eight years than Bernie Sanders has over his entire career in the federal government.
05-03-2017 , 08:52 PM
there's not much the Feds do I support, regardless of who the president is

Last edited by Jules22; 05-03-2017 at 08:54 PM. Reason: Baked
05-03-2017 , 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
Ya but you're telling me I should vote for a bank robber because the other guys a rapist (lol that was a convenient analogy to hijack). How about I don't vote for either scumbag just like I don't like bank robbers or rapists.
And your inactivity risks leading to the worse of the two winning.

How is this even a discussion at this stage? We discussed abstaining voters and why they are destructive long before the election.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
Jules is the best argument against legal marijuana.
Definitely does people who use it without becoming complete idiots a disservice.
05-03-2017 , 08:53 PM
I think this pothead has had more than enough attention for one day. Can we move on?
05-03-2017 , 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
Is that all he could have done? Or the least he could get away with. He certainly didn't try to reform much in federal sentencing standards, etc. shot the whole wad on ****ty Obama care instead nice call IDIOT

Obama
Ordered
The
Federal
Government
To
Use
Less
Private
Prisons


He didn't do "nothing"

It's better to take continual baby steps towards a better world than to swiftly go the other way


One is a car driving the opposite direction of where you want to go, but at least it's moving!!!

The other is a tricycle pedaling the right way very slowly

It's super super frustrating to be on that tricycle, but it's a very different situation than the car trying to go 70mph the opposite way (but luckily only goes 25mph the other way because it's a broken piece of ****)
05-03-2017 , 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
He accomplished more in eight years than Bernie Sanders has over his entire career in the federal government.
He didn't do Jack squat except fleece a bunch of people and leave a super rich celebrity. People still in prison over BS people still died by the scores at our hands overseas. You're a pathetic serf in my eyes, rooting for one lord over another and slurping up propaganda
05-03-2017 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules22
He didn't do Jack squat except fleece a bunch of people and leave a super rich celebrity. People still in prison over BS people still died by the scores at our hands overseas. You're a pathetic serf in my eyes, rooting for one lord over another and slurping up propaganda
You literally know nothing about what Obama did. You really need to stop listening to your idiot stoner friends opinions on this ****, sober up, and read some ****ing books.
05-03-2017 , 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
You literally know nothing about what Obama did. You really need to stop listening to your idiot stoner friends opinions on this ****, sober up, and read some ****ing books.
Money2burn loves obammmmmaaaaa why don't you give him a half a million for a speech and act like it's for a speech

      
m