That's why I picked #2. He's ashamed of his finances.

The more I think about it, the more I think he's too stupid to intentionally collude w/ Russia. Do I think he colluded with Russia? Yes. But he didn't commit treason intentionally. It was to enhance his brand. He's just too stupid to realize he committed a major crime.

Like Watergate, the cover up will cause more damage than the crime. I think this is an example of that. He's just a ****ing idiot that thinks he's smart.

I meant are you sure that his list sounds about right? Was pointing out how #3 doesn't belong on the list.

Yea, good point. He'd definitely brag about that.

Basically what you are saying is "LOL Avwal." In which case, I concur.

LOL Avwal

Now let's give everybody 30 seconds of their lives back.

Not good

Don't worry they are a bunch of pussies who always look for a female to rough up.

Shaun King's tweets are posted itt sometimes and he's clearly advocating violence against Trump and supporters in a bunch of tweets. Both sides are at fault in this train wreck.

Um, no he's not. Citation needed on that one. I follow Shaun King on twitter and I've never seen him post anything like that.

^this. citation or gtfo

Lol citation. Guys - he feels it's true. That's good enough in the post-fact age.

Spending agreement reached according to CNN.

Seems to imply that it has nothing that Trump demanded. No wall money, not defunding PP, no cutting funding to Obamacare.

Seems that he rolled over and just had Congress do all the work. Huge pussy!

Haha this is why I love this thread. Slappies come in and are immediately pointed out on their bull****.

Nevertheless, it is frustrating debating an opponent who's immune to facts.

I did. I stopped following him since he's such a raging tard trying to incite an assassination. Read his tweets from late-January through mid-February (when I unfollowed) and I'm sure you'll see them. They were not infrequent.

I'd hope you know from my frustrating post yesterday that I'm not anywhere close to a Trump supporter. I'm simply pointing out that both sides are calling for violence. Whether it's Mr. King or someone else, it doesn't matter but Mr. King has done so and the evidence is out there if you care enough.

edit: I don't know how to look through replies on twitter and can't see the original post (but can see my own post about the violence he's trying to incite) but he posted one on 11/27 and 11/29 of last year. I only posted in those tweets because he was posting so much to incite violence. I'll amend my " late-January through mid-February" to mid-November through sometime in December.

edit2: I really can't figure out how to see more than ~10 replies per tweet so I can't find his original **** but you got the dates.

Espn' issues don't have to do with ratings. They overpaid for multiple large sports contracts on their basis their subscriber base would remain flat. However because a significant number of people cut the cord the number went down and they have seen revenues drop close to 500 million a year from less subscriber fees paid to them by the cable and satellite providers.

Anyone who says it's because of espns politics is an idiot. Espn paid more than any network for their NFL package yet they have the WORST packages of the four. They might have overpaid by 500 million to 800 million for Monday night football alone.

As for ratings I suspect their bell cow of Sports Center no loner brings in viewers because most people can get all the information that sports center provides online and on demand.

One take I read on the layoffs is the salaries cut won't make a real dent in the black hole of money sucking them in and the layoffs are more to portray an image of aggressive action to shareholders. Not sure I buy it but it's possible.

But the espn politics and sjw take is just more evidence how blindly people will regurgitate something stupid without even thinking about it at all. I've seen people all over the place instantly triggered by that. It's so amazing.

Holy **** that Shaun King guy tweets a lot. I started scrolling back through his posts, went through like 6 screenfulls and it was still only like 16 hrs ago. Don't know how to search for tweets from a specific time range.

In this case though I have far have more an issue with it being just a poorly-written article with nothing of substance. I don't understand anybody's fascination with the guy at all. The WSJ stuff he got the Pulitzer for wasn't anything special either. He's like what Gwyneth Paltrow is to Hollywood for me.

This is not sufficient.

Citation or ban, Wookie, let's go.

There's nothing in the right-wing derposphere about King advocating violence against Trump and his supporters. There's one tweet about a coup if Trump gets elected, but not calling for one. And he offered to pay people to take down the confederate flag in South Carolina.

If Shaun King supported violence in a tweet, Breitbart would have told us.

A guy who is sued tries to blame someone else for the crime... thats all.

What's in and what's out in the latest government spending bill

lol Drumpf

That entire plan has almost nothing that he promised in it.

Seriously here's what Trump wanted

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democ...ly-half-budget

Congress's bill is a huge '**** You' to Trump. They clearly have no respect for him.

In all fairness to Trump, he kept his promises already in the first 100 days. There are none left.

nsis