Looks like we're back to deficits don't matter

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-w...-15-1493057898



https://twitter.com/SeanMcElwee/stat...37190837686274

The US Embassy in the UK is promoting Mar-a-Lago on its website.

https://uk.usembassy.gov/mar-lago-winter-white-house/

why is PB holding a giant fork?

This sort of stuff is why Trump's corruption isn't actually a threat to the Republic. He is a short term grifter down to the center of his soul. He has the entire apparatus of the state at his disposal and literally cannot think of anything beyond using official websites for advertising. This is the most American ****.

I believe that another part of that poll said that Trump would win the popular vote against Clinton if the vote was held today. They had him winning 43-40. I don't know if anyone has pointed it out already but the conclusion is obviously wrong. The numbers give it away. Trump's number coincides with the quote above. But in the case of Clinton it is clear that many of those who didn't like her but hated Trump felt inclined to answer the question without worrying that declining to choose Clinton could make Trump president. In other words everyone knows that much of that other 17% would switch back to Clinton in a real election, and therefore should realize that the results of the paper's poll was spurious.

He didn't win the popular vote before, he sure as **** wouldn't win it now

Former Fox News anchor and correspondent Heather Nauert will be the new U.S. State Department spokeswoman.

Nauert was most recently an anchor for Fox News' morning news show "Fox and Friends"

that's hilarious

It's the only way to get trump to listen to his state department.

Another Trump appointment with absolutely no motive behind it. State-run media, or media-run state? Sucks both ways I guess.

In my opinion that's a terribly worded question and the pollster is almost guilty of shading the results by asking it that way. Noone wants to say they "regret" their vote, especially not just 100 days in. And even if they end up hating Trump, they can still say they didn't "regret" their vote because they still hate Hillary for whatever reason.

I'm just thinking, if the Senate & House committees are both stalled on Russia, it probably means the FBI has a ****-ton of information than it never handed over to them; much more than we would suspect, and maybe even enough to implicate Republican committee members (such as Nunes).

Seth brought up a good point before. Why is the House committee calling the former Director of National Intelligence, who knows virtually nothing, to testify instead of the current DNI? IMO, It could be because he can't tell what he knows to the public OR to the committee itself.

EDIT: If the FBI is also stalled, WAAF right? Or is there still a chance for an independent commission?

How can this **** be legal?

It's OK if a Republican does it.

Mar-a-Lago obv the place for international meetings, both secret and public.

It's the other ****ers who will that are the problem



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hahahahaha. Who was it that had to trot out every time and defend Gorka? Time to strap on the armor and go back at it because Forward just keeps the slow drip of Gorka/ right wing Nazi connections

http://forward.com/news/369683/exclu...-back-decades/

LOOOOOOL SUSHY

RIP

What did Sushy do?

50% is still too low. And overall it was 55.5%. Remember, all it takes for HRC to win Michigan with respect to millennials would be 40-50K more of them showing up.

Thanks for posting this link, I didn't know about these. Very powerful.

Don't worry, he'll definitely higher ratings. All he has to do is be responsible for more deaths than 9/11, which shouldn't be hard by the time he finishes presidenting.

Forever striving to be 49th and 50th

I'm sure they got enough, not sure about Nunes, but Susan Rice, Obama and Hillary is doomed