Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

04-23-2017 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHip41
How anything these ****s do can boggle your mind boggles my mind
Touche.
04-23-2017 , 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHip41
You know what else is the law?

Not profiting off being the president and divesting from his investments before taking office.

And perjury.
And we still don't know the extent he knew about his "people" consorting with known foreign operatives.
04-23-2017 , 01:51 PM
Trump doubling down on his plan to blackmail the democrats on Obamacare funding.
04-23-2017 , 01:53 PM
Trumps political strategy is just comical.
04-23-2017 , 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
Trumps political strategy is just comical.
It really is. He thinks its all about getting the win. He's willing to sacrifice the health of millions of Americans in order to "win" the HC deal.
04-23-2017 , 01:55 PM
Jeff Sessions going with the "just kidding" defense re: his comments about Hawaii being "an island in the Pacific."
04-23-2017 , 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
Trumps political strategy is just comical.
He might be the President of the United States but his primary concern is himself, his family/close associates and then his cult of supporters tertiary. Whatever happens to the rest of Americans is of no interest to him.
04-23-2017 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
No their job is to make the roads as safe as possible. Road laws are a proxy for the real goal that is road safety (and revenue generation irl). Selective enforcement is an assumed unspoken aspect of our legal tradition.
There are downsides though. When enforcers have this much latitude certain people are more apt to be targeted than others. Better to raise the speed limit and then enforce it religiously. A similar solution might also be the answer to laws regarding undocumented immigrants.
04-23-2017 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
It really is. He thinks its all about getting the win. He's willing to sacrifice the health of millions of Americans in order to "win" the HC deal.
Don't forget how he's looking to trade the Democrats sick Americans for a victory getting the wall started.
04-23-2017 , 02:12 PM
THEN
"Mexico will pay for the wall."

TODAY
"Eventually, but at a later date so we can get started early, Mexico will be paying, in some form, for the badly needed border wall."

He's evolving.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...72056932700164

Last edited by Our House; 04-23-2017 at 02:32 PM. Reason: Tweet added.
04-23-2017 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
How is it hyperbole? It's literally what's going on. People born outside the US that are brought here as children are being deported. They didn't commit the crime of coming here illegally. Their parents did.

Imagine ICE shows up at your door right now and informs you that when you were a child, your parents came here illegally from India. You have a college degree, a job, a mortgage, car, wife and 2 kids. Tough **** you dirty foreigner. Get out. You don't speak Hindi? Not my problem. Get out. You haven't been to India in 25 years? Too bad. You don't belong here. Get out. Your wife and kids are crying hysterically because they don't know what's going on? Tough ****. Get out.

You don't see something wrong with this?

OH BUT THE LAW IS THE LAW! SORRY GUYS!
More hyperbole. Great.

And yes, I do see something wrong with that. I would like to believe in that scenario, if the person in question is here for many years and has been a contributing member of society, there should be (and likely is) an apparatus in place for the person to legally apply for citizenship.

I think, though, that the earlier reference was to a 2 year old and I do not agree that a 2 year olds parents, just by virtue of having a child born in the US, should automatically become citizens.

Last edited by lew189; 04-23-2017 at 02:56 PM.
04-23-2017 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark


Ugh this does not bode well
they only get their information from trump supporting sites and news, why wouldn't they? Nothing will ever be trumps fault.

The internet, more information at our fingertips than ever, and people only use it to find whatever fits their views or snap believe crazy conspiracy theories that used to be only tabloid material. WAAF
04-23-2017 , 02:52 PM
Now that the science march is over with: Trump sets executive orders on environment, energy this week

Quote:
The new measures would build on a number of energy- and environment-related executive orders signed by Trump that seek to gut most of the climate change regulations put in place by predecessor President Barack Obama.
04-23-2017 , 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
It just boggles my mind people like Sessions and Trump can see a person that was brought to the US when they were 2 years old and say "You need to get out you dirty foreigner!"
Um brown people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
Trumps political strategy is just comical.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
It really is. He thinks its all about getting the win. He's willing to sacrifice the health of millions of Americans in order to "win" the HC deal.
If you don't give me this politically unpopular thing I'm gonna do this other politicly unpopular thing I swear to god.
04-23-2017 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
More hyperbole. Great.

And yes, I do see something wrong with that. I would like to believe in that scenario, if the person in question is here for many years and has been a contributing member of society, there should be (and likely is) an apparatus in place for the person to legally apply for citizenship.

I think, though, that the earlier reference was to a 2 year old and I do not agree that a 2 year olds parents, just by virtue of having a child born in the US, should automatically become citizens.
huh?

dude, there is no "apparatus" for that. a two year has not legal path to citizenship if their parents brought them here. thats the whole point.

trump and sessions swear up and down that they dont want to deport them, and that they will not deport the. but obv it has already happened and will continue to happen. thats the whole point.

and it happens bc trump and his followers are straight up white supremacists pieces of sht.
04-23-2017 , 03:12 PM
and what is really messed up, is that this "apparatus" that you talk about, is actually being used to track these ppl and target them. they previously had been protected as DREAMERS as instituted by obama. but now when they go to update such registration, they are being deported. its totally sickening.

but trump supporters relish this.

the more pain they can cause the non-white ppl the better they feel.

many of these ppl have been here for decades and started families. their children are citizens and are no without mothers and fathers. trump supporters are absolutely giddy to destroy these families and love that they are causing hardship to the children by removing their parents from their lives.

if you voted for trump, then this is what you wanted. and you are getting it. congrats.
04-23-2017 , 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor

if you voted for trump, then this is what you wanted. and you are getting it. congrats.
This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen on the internet.
04-23-2017 , 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen on the internet.
You're a terrible judge of what's dumb.
04-23-2017 , 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
More hyperbole. Great.

And yes, I do see something wrong with that. I would like to believe in that scenario, if the person in question is here for many years and has been a contributing member of society, there should be (and likely is) an apparatus in place for the person to legally apply for citizenship.

I think, though, that the earlier reference was to a 2 year old and I do not agree that a 2 year olds parents, just by virtue of having a child born in the US, should automatically become citizens.
There isn't, and that'd be amnesty, which you oppose, right? Vociferously.

lew I hope you learned something about talking back today.
04-23-2017 , 03:36 PM
Lew, this is explicitly what he campaigned on.
04-23-2017 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen on the internet.
Man, Victor was being too kind. That's WHY you voted for Trump!

Amnesty for DREAMERs was a big ****ing issue in the campaign, Obama's DACA program deprioritized those people from deportation and the right flipped the **** out! Trump spent the entire ****ing primary blasting the other GOP candidates as being too soft on immigration, what on Earth did you imagine they were talking about?


Jesus Christ.
04-23-2017 , 04:11 PM


04-23-2017 , 04:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark


Ugh this does not bode well
The early incompetence of the administration is something that Trump will grow out of. Corrupt Hillary would never have grown out of her corruption. The olds born before 1980 are not going to regret picking Trump over Hillary nor should they. Making tough decisions is part of life, they made the right call despite having two bad options to choose from.
04-23-2017 , 04:18 PM
i was just thinking today that, what if trump just acts suspicious? like that's his personality quirk that whenever he's confronted on anything regardless of truth he gives off this conspicuously guilty affect?

i'm listening to old howard stern shows, and on feb 12, 2007 trump called in to the show for 35 minutes not to promote anything but to talk about his opinions on the recent death of anna nicole smith and his ongoing feud with rosie. howard at one point remarked on ivanka's beauty and asked if she had recently gotten breast implants. trump said, "she has not told me that", and howard mused if a 20-something daughter would tell her father that, to which trump responded "probably not". but he had just explained that he works with her every day at the family business, so if she didn't get breast implants and you see her every day, why not just say "no she didn't get any breast implants"? i guess he was trying to turn this line of questioning into media buzz about his daughter's tits.
04-23-2017 , 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prana


He's losing his mind, nobody but his base cares. His conspiracies will start to wear on the more moderate GOPers.

      
m