Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

04-21-2017 , 02:02 PM
House intel hearings on russia May 2nd

still gonna be a ****show but there are scheduled hearings and they did invite Yates.

Oh they're gonna try to get her on the spying/unmasking/leaking nonsense narrative. Good luck with that repubs. Hope that blows up in your face.
04-21-2017 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Suppose Trump was on Death Row?
I don't think I will.
04-21-2017 , 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Suppose Trump was on Death Row?
Leaving someone in jail for life lets them reflect on just how badly they ****ed up, killing them frees them of that.

Trump's probably too narcissistic for him to reflect on much but at least he'd be guaranteed to spend the rest of his days in a derelict ****hole of a cell and not a gilded mansion.
04-21-2017 , 02:08 PM
LUL @ Trump moving those goal posts.
04-21-2017 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thethethe

Looking who works for him, it wouldn't surprise me...

Shannon Sorensen


Alexandra Hirst
Those chicks are gross dude.
04-21-2017 , 02:11 PM
trump seems pretty upset and think it's unfair about being held to what he's done in the first 100 days, who's the jerk that made that a deadline anyway

04-21-2017 , 02:13 PM
Ah, but you see he's very clever. He didn't promise to achieve those things, merely introduce the broad measures and fight for their passage, so he fully delivered.

The real meat's on the first page of that "contract".
04-21-2017 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Those chicks are gross dude.
uwot

too pointy elbows?
04-21-2017 , 02:16 PM
trains are behind schedule at 100-day mark. inherited a mess doe
04-21-2017 , 02:21 PM
Capital Punishment could be OK only if:

1. It is proven that it sometimes deters and

2. The criteria for certainty of guilt was moved to "beyond a shadow of a doubt" and

3. The murderer was a non poor person who meticulously planned the act purely to make money OR the murderer was someone who was already going to get life in prison who would otherwise consider his next murder a free roll. The "cruelty" of the murder should not be a factor.

I would also add a number four to prevent shenanigans.

4. To be eligible for capital punishment you must be white.
04-21-2017 , 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Capital Punishment could be OK only if - JK, it's never ok.


I agree completely.

Love how the pro life party wants to keep murdering people.
04-21-2017 , 02:35 PM
God has spoken.
04-21-2017 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Capital Punishment could be OK only if:

1. It is proven that it sometimes deters and

2. The criteria for certainty of guilt was moved to "beyond a shadow of a doubt" and

3. The murderer was a non poor person who meticulously planned the act purely to make money OR the murderer was someone who was already going to get life in prison who would otherwise consider his next murder a free roll. The "cruelty" of the murder should not be a factor.

I would also add a number four to prevent shenanigans.

4. To be eligible for capital punishment you must be white.
lol
04-21-2017 , 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Capital Punishment could be OK only if:

1. It is proven that it sometimes deters and

2. The criteria for certainty of guilt was moved to "beyond a shadow of a doubt" and

3. The murderer was a non poor person who meticulously planned the act purely to make money OR the murderer was someone who was already going to get life in prison who would otherwise consider his next murder a free roll. The "cruelty" of the murder should not be a factor.

I would also add a number four to prevent shenanigans.

4. To be eligible for capital punishment you must be white.
Number 3 is my favorite, but the "Shenanigans rider" is pretty solid, also.
04-21-2017 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Capital Punishment could be OK only if:

1. It is proven that it sometimes deters and

2. The criteria for certainty of guilt was moved to "beyond a shadow of a doubt" and

3. The murderer was a non poor person who meticulously planned the act purely to make money OR the murderer was someone who was already going to get life in prison who would otherwise consider his next murder a free roll. The "cruelty" of the murder should not be a factor.

I would also add a number four to prevent shenanigans.

4. To be eligible for capital punishment you must be white.
You are close to drawing dead on point one.
04-21-2017 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Those chicks are gross dude.
The blonde looks like she'd be wild.
04-21-2017 , 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
The blonde looks like she'd be willing.
.
04-21-2017 , 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
I wonder if the four dissenting justices missed this part in their briefs?
And of the two written dissents produced by those four, zero had anything to do with innocence but instead on the general problems they have with execution procedures. I don't know how my post could have been much clearer wrt that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Please cite where I argued that the guy is innocent. I never did any such thing, it's just that you can't deal with the actual arguments so you have to create a weak straw man that you can blow down. Be more intellectually honest...
Seriously? That's exactly what you were doing by posting those three tweets and you know it. You just saw them in a feed somewhere and gobbled it up immediately, and spewed it back out as with your normal spam. It's like Breitbart-left with your posts sometimes
04-21-2017 , 03:12 PM
So, did this ******* start a series of tweets about China this morning and then just, Not finish it? Wtf?
04-21-2017 , 03:27 PM
Someone must have dangled shiny keys.
04-21-2017 , 03:29 PM
Any chance a dem will be able to fill the vacant Florida Senate seat?
04-21-2017 , 03:30 PM

https://twitter.com/sarahnferris/sta...97861655605253
04-21-2017 , 03:35 PM
Such shrewd negotiations...
04-21-2017 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Those chicks are gross dude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
The blonde looks like she'd be wild.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
.
Apparently the simple act of working for Jason Chaffetz is a grave enough crime for these women's looks and sexual appetites to be critiqued and speculated on.
04-21-2017 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Any chance a dem will be able to fill the vacant Florida Senate seat?
No.

Rubio slaughtered Murphy despite making an absolute fool of himself endorsing Trump.

Florida is super racist

      
m