Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

04-17-2017 , 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
No, I think 2+2 had just a few employees but he definitely made a thread like "I was going to hire another one but Obama's tax plan would prevent me from doing so. Vote McCain!". Zero mention of how many dozens more employees he could have hired had the GOP never passed UIGEA.
It was three employees, they were going to add a 4th but just couldn't possibly afford it because mean old Obama raised their taxes.
04-17-2017 , 06:36 PM
my bad dudes, got busy at work and didn't see I ****ed up the link

here's the right article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b04cae050dc87c
04-17-2017 , 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Feinstein is the WORST, you guys have to primary her FFS
04-17-2017 , 06:43 PM
Jeff Sessions is the WORST of the WORST, using ill-logic to destroy personal freedoms one by one.
04-17-2017 , 06:43 PM
04-17-2017 , 06:45 PM
It should be punishable by death to call the republicans the party of freedom.
04-17-2017 , 06:49 PM
Reporter: But taxes, visitor logs...you guys are the least transparent ever.
Spice: I disagree. Look at the times we choose to (when it makes POTUS look like God) give the media a heads up. We don't have to do that.
04-17-2017 , 06:51 PM
The Huff Po story doesn't have any sources, just cites "chatter" which is probably someone this guy talked to guessing.
04-17-2017 , 06:51 PM

https://twitter.com/voxdotcom/status/854027944947097600
04-17-2017 , 06:53 PM
Sigh....
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...01790886948866

IT'S NOT LIKE YOU'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF STARTING A NUCLEAR WAR OR ANYTHING IMPORTANT!
04-17-2017 , 07:18 PM
I can't wait until this special election in Georgia is over. I've gotten at least ten calls today about it. I don't answer and most don't leave messages, but I know that's what the calls are for.
04-17-2017 , 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
Feinstein is the WORST, you guys have to primary her FFS
I'd like to see seniority be less important in congress. I'm not saying we should keep Feinstein, but her seniority is an argument to overcome for Californians and Democrats.
04-17-2017 , 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
my bad dudes, got busy at work and didn't see I ****ed up the link

here's the right article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b04cae050dc87c
heh when I clicked your link it googled the topic for me

Then I clicked another link and didn't bother to notice the date so **** me too
04-17-2017 , 07:54 PM
04-17-2017 , 08:12 PM

https://twitter.com/tomgara/status/854122364384280578
04-17-2017 , 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
**** them both, hope they die
So if they were drowning in a lake as you walked past, and you could easily save them but are in a state that doesn't legally require it, you wouldn't do it (assuming no one could see you walk on by)?
04-17-2017 , 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
So if they were drowning in a lake as you walked past, and you could easily save them but are in a state that doesn't legally require it, you wouldn't do it (assuming no one could see you walk on by)?
I called your post babe Ruth style but this out does what I even thought you were capable of.
04-17-2017 , 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I called your post babe Ruth style but this outdoes what I even thought you were capable of.
What do you mean by "babe Ruth style"?

And, that post was like the pure essence of Sklansky.
04-17-2017 , 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
So if they were drowning in a lake as you walked past, and you could easily save them but are in a state that doesn't legally require it, you wouldn't do it (assuming no one could see you walk on by)?
why would i risk drowning to save those two *******s?
04-17-2017 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
So if they were drowning in a lake as you walked past, and you could easily save them but are in a state that doesn't legally require it, you wouldn't do it (assuming no one could see you walk on by)?
Video it and place it on Facebook?
04-17-2017 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
What do you mean by "babe Ruth style"?

And, that post was like the pure essence of Sklansky.
Earlier today I predicted Sklansky would make an idiotic post regarding the move to ban online gaming. To be fair, I predicted he would support it with some awful tortured "thought experiment" when if fact his chosen "thought experiment" was a meaningless strawman question.

I'm still giving myself credit for pointing to the bleachers and calling my homerun, Babe Ruth style.
04-17-2017 , 08:48 PM

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/statu...30554349998080
04-17-2017 , 08:57 PM
I didn't even know that everyone was talking about online gambling. I was just wondering if rep lol meant what he said literally. I thought, incorrectly that reframing his statement would force him to retract. Now that I know the subject matter, I don't blame him. Its completely insane that anyone would think I want an online gambling ban.

I would note though that rep lol posted a few years ago that he was appalled at the idea of torture EVEN IF it was only applied to murderers and EVEN IF it was certain to save future innocent lives. So what if torturing these ladies saved online poker?
04-17-2017 , 08:59 PM
We like dictators that we have quid pro quo deals with us to serve as an extension of our aggressive foreign policy.

No surprise Trump is bff with Erdogan.
04-17-2017 , 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
I didn't even know that everyone was talking about online gambling. I was just wondering if rep lol meant what he said literally. I thought, incorrectly that reframing his statement would force him to retract. Now that I know the subject matter, I don't blame him. Its completely insane that anyone would think I want an online gambling ban.

I would note though that rep lol posted a few years ago that he was appalled at the idea of torture EVEN IF it was only applied to murderers and EVEN IF it was certain to save future innocent lives. So what if torturing these ladies saved online poker?
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

      
m