Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

04-16-2018 , 03:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
3>>>2>4>>>1>5

COME AT ME BRO
No way 3 and 2 are 1st and 2nd.

4, 1, 2, 3, 5 is the correct sequence.
04-16-2018 , 03:46 PM
04-16-2018 , 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunyonAve


"Hold my beer."
04-16-2018 , 03:47 PM
04-16-2018 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
LOL Hannity. I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that dumb people hire dumb lawyers.



Strategic advice = how to draft an NDA to hide your illegitimate children
Business consulting = “I'm warning you, tread very ****ing lightly, because what I'm going to do to you is going to be ****ing disgusting. You understand me?”
And adoptions = Magnitsky sanctions
04-16-2018 , 03:48 PM
If it was help with a living trust or something (lol) why would he be concerned with it becoming public? Really, if there was nothing abnormal Hannity would have spent ample airtime spouting off about Cohen being such an upstanding and competent lawyer he even used him himself.
04-16-2018 , 03:49 PM

https://twitter.com/ShaneWatch/statu...61179196436480
04-16-2018 , 03:50 PM
Taking this with a big grain of salt, but please, please, please!


https://twitter.com/20committee/stat...94914523602947
04-16-2018 , 03:52 PM
From Reddit:

Quote:
This would be the same Sean Hannity to whom Julian Assange offered dirt on Mark Warner, through backdoor channels both were aware of [1]. The same Sean Hannity who has become one of Trump's most trusted advisers, telling him to shut down the Mueller investigation [2]. He's probably as deep in it as anyone.

At the very least, he has been spending a week railing against an investigation without disclosing that it affects him personally. Fox needs to suspend him immediately.

[1] Daily Beast, "Julian Assange Offered Hannity Impersonator ‘News’ About Top Democrat"

[2] Daily Beast, "Sean Hannity Has Been Advising Donald Trump on the Nunes Memo, Because of Course He Has"
https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/co...nnity/dxguj1w/
04-16-2018 , 03:53 PM


What on earth is going on?
04-16-2018 , 03:53 PM
I listened to Hannity's show until he issued his statement. You all owe me dearly. I need a shower.

"Michael never represented me in any matter, I never retained him in the traditional sense as retaining a lawyer, I never received an invoice from Michael, I never paid legal fees to Michael, but I have occasionally had brief discussions with him about legal questions about which I wanted his input and perspective. And I assume that those conversations were attorney-client confidential."

"Not one of any issue I ever dealt with Michael Cohen on ever, ever involved a matter between me and any third party. Now, I have eight attorneys that I use for varying things in my life, and in this particular case, I like to have people I can run questions by."

He claimed attorney-client privilege was established by saying, "Attorney-client?" and getting an affirmative response. Doesn't this have to be established by PAYING the attorney?

A few minutes later he says he probably gave him $10 once or something. He went on to opine about the death of truth and the demise of attorney-client privilege.
04-16-2018 , 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Is Ruth Chris a steak house?
One time for well done with ketchup
04-16-2018 , 03:56 PM
Tonight on Hannity, a car crash compilation.
04-16-2018 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
I listened to Hannity's show until he issued his statement. You all owe me dearly. I need a shower.

"Michael never represented me in any matter, I never retained him in the traditional sense as retaining a lawyer, I never received an invoice from Michael, I never paid legal fees to Michael, but I have occasionally had brief discussions with him about legal questions about which I wanted his input and perspective. And I assume that those conversations were attorney-client confidential."

"Not one of any issue I ever dealt with Michael Cohen on ever, ever involved a matter between me and any third party. Now, I have eight attorneys that I use for varying things in my life, and in this particular case, I like to have people I can run questions by."

He claimed attorney-client privilege was established by saying, "Attorney-client?" and getting an affirmative response. Doesn't this have to be established by PAYING the attorney?

A few minutes later he says he probably gave him $10 once or something. He went on to opine about the death of truth and the demise of attorney-client privilege.
04-16-2018 , 03:58 PM
Hannity: “All I did was to run “hypotheticals” regarding murdered hookers by Michael.”
04-16-2018 , 03:59 PM
This is all such a hilarious reflection of the Trump orbit and the people they associate with. Hannity has stupid amounts of money and could easily get an extremely competent lawyer for any reason, but apparently he really does worship Donald Trump and values his personal recommendations for this dip**** lawyer who's not particularly good at his job, but does come with the priceless qualification that Donald Trump vouched for him.
04-16-2018 , 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
Taking this with a big grain of salt, but please, please, please!


https://twitter.com/20committee/stat...94914523602947
RIS = Russian Intelligence Service?

The first Google result is Roosevelt Intermediate School, which is doubtful. Then again, he did use Cohen as his lawyer...
04-16-2018 , 04:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Not really true in this specific matter. Spears & Imes is one of the top boutique white-collar crime firms. That said, they are likely in a tough spot in the matter, so making some less than ideal arguments, given their weak hand.
04-16-2018 , 04:00 PM
A thing of beauty.

04-16-2018 , 04:02 PM
Tapper opens with, "Go home 2018, you're drunk."
04-16-2018 , 04:03 PM

https://twitter.com/eorden/status/985959902207270912
04-16-2018 , 04:03 PM
From October regarding first Mueller indictments:

Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Let's say it's two people getting arrested next week on these charges.

Fill in the blanks:

I think it will be ______ and _______.

I hope it's ______ and ______.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
I think it will be _TBD_ and _TBD_.
I hope it's Hannity and _TBD_.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
It's about the longest of longshots, but I'd probably drink myself into a stupor in celebration of seeing that prick in cuffs.
Man I hope I can drink myself into a stupor.
04-16-2018 , 04:03 PM
Every day there's a new hey look Pruitt found a new way to rip everybody off and it's just totally buried b/c there's a bombshell every god damn day.
04-16-2018 , 04:03 PM
Quote:

"I never received an invoice from Michael, I never paid legal fees to Michael"
04-16-2018 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
He claimed attorney-client privilege was established by saying, "Attorney-client?" and getting an affirmative response. Doesn't this have to be established by PAYING the attorney?

A few minutes later he says he probably gave him $10 once or something. He went on to opine about the death of truth and the demise of attorney-client privilege.
Even Saul Goodman wanted $5 to make the relationship official. I assume some panicked lawyer rushed in after the first statement to make the revision. It seems like claiming you never had an attorney-client relationship with your attorney is on the same level as claiming you were never a party to an NDA that you're trying to enforce.

      
m