Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

07-31-2017 , 05:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuv
Stirewalt: Scaramucci Firing 'Could Be Viewed as Moment the Comeback Started'
Does Stirewalt know Trump hired him ten days ago?
07-31-2017 , 05:43 PM
Mooch got fired?!?!?!?!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I can't wait to watch the spin on this. The beginning of the turnaround!
07-31-2017 , 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
we love you. you are loved.
Heh. Tell the pile-on crowd who has been refuting my evidence without even looking at it since this all started on Friday.
07-31-2017 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Jokes like this will go on for years.
07-31-2017 , 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Another gross mischaracterization of what actually happened.
It's not a gross mischaracterization. The entire point of the thread is not to seriously discuss editorial decisions made by media outlets. You have no thesis about the thing the OP is supposed to be about. No points to make. It's clear the whole thread and the questions in the OP weren't sincerely asked, and what you wanted was to quickly move past the superficial questions and wonder aloud which zany Trump stories you think aren't being reported on because reporters are torn up inside that bad news about Trump might cause his white trash army to burn down the empty factories they don't work in anymore, and whether the media has a moral responsibility to report on billions of embezzlements to Putin and pee pee videos and stuff. I like fantastical musings about Trump that assume his voters are rage filled idiots as much as the next guy but like any normal person, do not appreciate the false advertising.
07-31-2017 , 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacktheDumb
Didn´t we have a rather depressing survey that cam to the conclusion that 98% of Trump voters would vote for him again?

We all know that he is failing in a spectacular way but for the typical Trumpkin this s just the Swamp being so corrupt that not even Trump can do anything about it.
96% months ago. Someone posted how it dropped to the lower 90s more recently but I don't remember the exact number.
07-31-2017 , 05:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Does Stirewalt know Trump hired him ten days ago?
He only hired him so he can fire him and start the comeback.
07-31-2017 , 05:51 PM
The fridge is nice.
https://twitter.com/darth/status/892109063269474305
07-31-2017 , 05:53 PM
rasmussen has trump at 39/61

he's never been worse than 58% disapprove with them
07-31-2017 , 05:59 PM
Bill Mitchell has a hellofa Trump impression going on Twitter:
07-31-2017 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
It's not a gross mischaracterization. The entire point of the thread is not to seriously discuss editorial decisions made by media outlets. You have no thesis about the thing the OP is supposed to be about. No points to make. It's clear the whole thread and the questions in the OP weren't sincerely asked, and what you wanted was to quickly move past the superficial questions and wonder aloud which zany Trump stories you think aren't being reported on because reporters are torn up inside that bad news about Trump might cause his white trash army to burn down the empty factories they don't work in anymore, and whether the media has a moral responsibility to report on billions of embezzlements to Putin and pee pee videos and stuff.
I didn't know a thesis was required for every post and every thread. Is that your rule that you're imposing on me and then discrediting me for not posting it? Cause that's pure BS. I post a lot and don't see you giving credit whenever there IS a thesis.

I also don't think I need to meet the demand that I preface every post with everything I know about a subject.

Russia happens to be a special interest of mine, because it's heavily/directly linked to Trump's destruction of Democracy, gaslighting, and deflections, among many other things around the world, and is literally THE most important thing this country has ever dealt with, regardless of what an uninformed public thinks. Yet I've been extremely reserved about starting Russia threads (Which, as you should understand, makes me extra bothered when people try to draw connections that aren't there unless you assume what I'm thinking. And then it becomes your problem, not mine.).

North Korea is creeping up as extremely important also, and Trump and Russia have both helped to escalate it.

Last edited by Our House; 07-31-2017 at 06:04 PM.
07-31-2017 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
rasmussen has trump at 39/61

he's never been worse than 58% disapprove with them
He just hit a new low in net approval in 538 poll average, fwiw.

Eta: -18
07-31-2017 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
EVERY. SINGLE. THING. HAS. ITS. OWN. TWEET.

It really is amazing. We might be living in a simulation.
Does it work the other way? Can we peek into the future by looking at his tweets from 4 years ago and anticipate the opposite?
07-31-2017 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
I didn't know a thesis was required for every post and every thread. Is that your rule that you're imposing on me and then discrediting me for not posting it? Cause that's pure BS. I post a lot and don't see you giving credit whenever there IS a thesis.

I also don't think I need to meet the demand that I preface every post with everything I know about a subject.

Russia happens to be a special interest of mine, because it's heavily/directly linked to Trump's destruction of Democracy, gaslighting, and deflections, among many other things around the world, and is literally THE most important thing this country has ever dealt with, regardless of what an uninformed public thinks.

North Korea is creeping up also, and Trump and Russia have both helped to escalate it.
The Civil War says hi.
07-31-2017 , 06:04 PM
07-31-2017 , 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Does it work the other way? Can we peek into the future by looking at his tweets from 4 years ago and anticipate the opposite?
Sort of but it seems to work much shorter term now:


No WH chaos!(for another 6 hours)
07-31-2017 , 06:07 PM
Maybe I missed it. Did Scaramucci get his $85 million deal from China before he was "fired" or whatever Huckabeast claimed?
07-31-2017 , 06:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyc999
There are now officially *three* things certain in life, death, taxes, and the trump self-own tweet from the past.
07-31-2017 , 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoder
this personnel turnover is expected. Most new presidents get people from the last admin of their party. But Trump was not in sync with GWB admin personnel. So he got people from his campaign to serve. But campaigning and governing is different. So you watch and see which ones excel at governing and get rid of the those that don't. We've had 6 months to observe who is doing well and with more time it will get easier to pick those good at governing. the quality of the Trump admin personnel will improve much over time, just as it did for previous new presidents.
Having been a couple days behind on this thread (which means like 10 pages) and just seeing this now, would like to highlight this comrade's post from Friday as a Post That Has Not Aged Well
07-31-2017 , 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by th14
Dunno about all that but Tillerson not knowing where the bathroom is is a good burn.
07-31-2017 , 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ligastar
The Civil War says hi.
Trump already tweeted projecting how he would be able to stop civil war 2 before it happens. We're totally screwed.
07-31-2017 , 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Comey was fired 17 days ago so 17 days=1 Trump year.
Almost 7 months in Trump years not bad Mooch.
07-31-2017 , 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Bill Mitchell has a hellofa Trump impression going on Twitter:
The consumers of 20 years of FoxNews bull**** are now crapping the twice-distilled excrement from a diet of pure bull**** into the mouths of an even dumber clientele on the end of the human centipede.

Last edited by suzzer99; 07-31-2017 at 06:18 PM.
07-31-2017 , 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
Retrospectively, it seems clear this had to happen. As a military guy, Kelly had to insist on staff discipline and a clear chain of command. The Mooch came in insulting the Chief of Staff. No way Kelly could let him stay even a day. Hell if I know how he expects to deal with the ultimate source of chaos though.
Trump and Kelly will not be able to avoid clashing in the near future. Trump and anyone actually.
07-31-2017 , 06:23 PM

      
m