Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

06-26-2017 , 09:48 PM
Someday, under a future enlightenment, this world will be a much better place with way fewer chicken**** pussies trying to shut the closet door and hide from fictional boogiemen promoted for profit by opportunistic whores.
06-26-2017 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Pretty sure that's just the premise from World War Z.
Then they would not touch One Step since he's obviously ill.
06-26-2017 , 10:01 PM
These dudes, like the f**kface that just got scorch banned, present this bizarre paradox about trumpers. A trumparadox, if you will. The dudes who hate the brown people the most also come closest to justifying a hypothetical brown person hating the west.

p.s. Like, if a RaDiCaL TeRrOrIsT told me he hated America and showed me that dude's posts as justification, I'd have to take a really deep breath before I offered a counterpoint.
06-26-2017 , 10:03 PM
The White House is trying to start a quick war with Syria just now. Yeah we done.
06-26-2017 , 10:13 PM
Yup. Can we trust them?

https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/879520906963554305
06-26-2017 , 10:16 PM
Thanks to whoever nuked the racist troll.

The Syria thing seems out of left field but Trump is so erratic and desperate it is scary.
06-26-2017 , 10:33 PM
**** maybe going down in Syria. Meanwhile



https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...25817361068032
06-26-2017 , 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Yup. Can we trust them?

https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/879520906963554305

https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/statu...29054726234112

Quote:
Five defense officials reached by BuzzFeed News said they not only did not know where the potential chemical attack would come from, but they had no idea that the White House would release its statement. Usually such statements are coordinated across the national security agencies and departments before they are released.

A Pentagon spokesperson declined to comment on the matter, and referred to the White House statement. Secretary of Defense James Mattis departed earlier Monday evening for a three-day trip to Germany and Belgium, and Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Joseph Dunford was in Afghanistan.

A State Department spokesperson referred BuzzFeed News to the White House statement and said the agency did not have anything to add at this point.

Meanwhile, ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley tweeted that Russia and Iran would share the blame of any future attack by Assad against the Syrian people.
06-26-2017 , 10:46 PM
narc prayer is good but missing "and it's your fault" at the end.
06-26-2017 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
**** maybe going down in Syria. Meanwhile



https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...25817361068032
i dont even
06-26-2017 , 11:17 PM
It's like every DVaut post mashed into one character

http://deadspin.com/the-progressive-...lin-1796426671
06-26-2017 , 11:18 PM
So Trump really wants to bomb Syria? It sounds like a repeat of Iraq.

I guess he loved all the glowing reviews that TV anchors gave him the last time he launched missiles.

Last edited by synth_floyd; 06-26-2017 at 11:25 PM.
06-26-2017 , 11:24 PM
So hard for the media to cope with a White House that just issues constant lies. I mean the media is reporting these "concerns over a potential chemical weapons attack" because what else can they do? That's a story. But is there any evidence for the existence of these "concerns" other than a press release which is essentially a typed-up Trump tweet?
06-26-2017 , 11:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
These dudes, like the f**kface that just got scorch banned, present this bizarre paradox about trumpers. A trumparadox, if you will. The dudes who hate the brown people the most also come closest to justifying a hypothetical brown person hating the west.

p.s. Like, if a RaDiCaL TeRrOrIsT told me he hated America and showed me that dude's posts as justification, I'd have to take a really deep breath before I offered a counterpoint.
Not really a paradox when you see them as approximate mirror images of each other. ISIS's article about getting rid of the gray zone is on point for all of these clowns.
06-26-2017 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
So hard for the media to cope with a White House that just issues constant lies. I mean the media is reporting these "concerns over a potential chemical weapons attack" because what else can they do? That's a story. But is there any evidence for the existence of these "concerns" other than a press release which is essentially a typed-up Trump tweet?
Trumpcast today regarding Trump's lies. https://play.google.com/music/m/D52e...ates_Trumpcast
06-27-2017 , 12:10 AM
“Although he has only been in office a few months, Donald Trump’s presidency has had a major impact on how the world sees the United States. Trump and many of his key policies are broadly unpopular around the globe, and ratings for the U.S. have declined steeply in many nations. According to a new*Pew Research Center survey*spanning 37 nations, a median of just 22% has confidence in Trump to do the right thing when it comes to international affairs.”

“This stands in contrast to the final years of Barack Obama’s presidency, when a median of 64% expressed confidence in Trump’s predecessor to direct America’s role in the world.”

https://politicalwire.com/2017/06/26...-around-world/
06-27-2017 , 12:25 AM

https://twitter.com/nikkihaley/statu...28793135878145
06-27-2017 , 12:36 AM
Is that typical UN Ambassador type stuff to say?
06-27-2017 , 12:49 AM
no we're probably gonna die soon tick tick tick tick
06-27-2017 , 01:41 AM
Trump doesn't care who we start a war with; but my god does he want to start a war.

Also this
06-27-2017 , 01:52 AM
29 seems absurdly high for Australia, the last survey I saw had Trump's approval rating at 10% here. The only thing I can guess is that some people just aren't following the whole circus and are expressing a general confidence in the US to handle world affairs (which is a little bit lol in itself, but anyway...).
06-27-2017 , 01:55 AM
Quote:
A new poll from the left-leaning think-tank the Australia Institute shows 60 per cent of Australians think Mr Trump's election will result in a negative outcome for the world, while 48 per cent said Australia should be more independent from America on military and security matters.

The poll of 1420 voters released on Friday showed 19 per cent said the New York businessman's win was a positive outcome, with 65 per cent of women and 55 per cent of men responding negatively.
That's circa April. More support than I would have guessed.
06-27-2017 , 03:26 AM
I wonder if this gives Republicans/conversatives pause or if they rejoice that finally someone is sticking it to those pansy Euros with their health care, 6 weeks of paid vacation and lack of obesity.
06-27-2017 , 03:44 AM
Trump went on and on about how badly the world viewed us under Obama but somehow those numbers will fit right in with making America great.
06-27-2017 , 03:48 AM
apples and oranges

you need the comparison of Obama in 2009 with Trump in 2017

      
m