The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. - Page 53 - Politics and Economics

i imagine mike pence is gonna start having visions very soon.

edit: from now on when somebody uses "unbelievable", it means don't believe it and fact check it before you even think about believing that thing

Last edited by ScreaminAsian; 01-25-2017 at 06:20 PM.

01-25-2017 , 06:24 PM

#1303

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,257

The "take Trump seriously, not literally" crowd has morphed into the "that's literally what we want" crowd

01-25-2017 , 06:27 PM

#1304

catch thirtythree

banned

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 821

more fake news from the mainstream media regarding the Trump administration. this time ABC

http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/25/ab..._medium=Social

01-25-2017 , 06:29 PM

#1305

prana

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 8,513

this guy talking about editing while defending the complete lies of a president.

01-25-2017 , 06:29 PM

#1306

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,257

Quote:

Originally Posted by catch thirtythree

more fake news from the mainstream media regarding the Trump administration. this time ABC

http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/25/ab..._medium=Social

Biased source

01-25-2017 , 06:30 PM

#1307

catch thirtythree

banned

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 821

what lies did I defend

01-25-2017 , 06:30 PM

#1308

lycosid

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 2,806

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl

I thought it was interesting they did it by district and not by percentage of the popular vote in Virginia.

Is anybody out there proposing proportioning EVs by in-state % of the popular vote? I'm not sure what that would look like. You'd need 61% of the vote to grab 8/13 EVs?

01-25-2017 , 06:31 PM

#1309

catch thirtythree

banned

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 821

better?

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/nigh...ry?id=45017358

01-25-2017 , 06:31 PM

#1310

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,257

Quote:

Originally Posted by catch thirtythree

what lies did I defend

You used a biased source, ipso facto it's false

01-25-2017 , 06:32 PM

#1311

catch thirtythree

banned

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 821

I just posted a source from the horse's mouth, chief

01-25-2017 , 06:32 PM

#1312

markksman

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 20,921

Quote:

Originally Posted by catch thirtythree

more fake news from the mainstream media regarding the Trump administration. this time ABC

http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/25/ab..._medium=Social

Uh huh. Lol at calling that fake news. Fleischer was a former whps. He should learn to talk better. The quote was 100% accurate. He said it and he has not claimed otherwise. That he is upset they did not include a comment about another day is not fake news.

How do words work.

01-25-2017 , 06:32 PM

#1313

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,257

Quote:

Originally Posted by catch thirtythree

better?

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/nigh...ry?id=45017358

ABC is a biased source. Try harder. WordPress pages only.

01-25-2017 , 06:32 PM

#1314

iron81

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,729

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycosid

Is anybody out there proposing in-state % of the popular vote? I'm not sure what that would look like. You'd need 61% of the vote to grab 8/13 EVs?

No one is proposing that because that is in fact what it would look like. You could forget about any Presidential candidate caring about your state

01-25-2017 , 06:37 PM

#1315

FlyWf

It's the other way

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 58,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mayo

Today I learned that if all 50 states split their electoral votes like Nebraska and Maine do, Mitt Romney would have won in 2012.

Yep. A bunch of swing states with Republican leadership(due to gerrymandering and off-year elections) are looking to do the same thing.

The GOP has won one popular vote for President in the past 7 elections, and it was very close. They know which way the tide is going.

01-25-2017 , 06:40 PM

#1316

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 72,310

Quote:

Originally Posted by catch thirtythree

the law applies to everyone equally, how is that suppressive?

You actuall already explained it in your post. The law is much more likely to disqualify dems.

And analogies to actual crime laws is not logical bc voting is a right.

01-25-2017 , 06:40 PM

#1317

FlyWf

It's the other way

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 58,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Relevant.

Yep.

Y'all got to remember that the modern right wing rejects democracy. It's just not a thing they value, so trying to embarrass this latest troll with how he "doesn't know how voting works" or "a nationwide study found 31 fraudulent votes between 2000-2014" and ****...

He doesn't care.

01-25-2017 , 06:41 PM

#1318

goofyballer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 70,719

"Poll taxes apply to everyone equally, I don't get how you can say it's a partisan thing"

01-25-2017 , 06:42 PM

#1319

lycosid

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 2,806

Quote:

Originally Posted by iron81

No one is proposing that because that is in fact what it would look like. You could forget about any Presidential candidate caring about your state

The Congressional District proposal is also a lock 7-6 vote, with an outside chance of 8-5 if Loudoun County continues to explode in population and look more like Fairfax politically. As it stands right now, Clinton won by 4.5 points and the closest House district went Republican by almost 6 points.

01-25-2017 , 06:55 PM

#1320

Money2Burn

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 12,628

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyWf

I agree with this, but I haven't figured what the appropriate response is to this kind of stuff? Just ridicule? Laughter?

01-25-2017 , 06:56 PM

#1321

jalfrezi

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 12,368

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyWf

Very interesting.

What are the other options?

01-25-2017 , 07:01 PM

#1322

Mayo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 50,967

I don't know much about Nazis, so I've been reading "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." Just yesterday, I was incredulously shaking my head at their idea that the only scientific truth was "German Chemistry" and "German Physics," and all the professors and scientists were forced to make sure their scientific results conformed to the "correct" political viewpoint. Preposterous!

Then today I saw this:

01-25-2017 , 07:01 PM

#1323

FlyWf

It's the other way

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 58,097

We need to obstruct what we can and then win in 2018. Seriously if 2018 isn't a Democratic wave election, I mean like flipping multiple state legislatures, 2020 is very likely going to be a Trump re-election.

01-25-2017 , 07:05 PM

#1324

markksman

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 20,921

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mayo

I wonder who the secretary of science is? Which of those chuckleheads are qualified to vet scientific papers and data?

01-25-2017 , 07:06 PM

#1325

FlyWf

It's the other way

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 58,097

But miajag is right, the odds of America having a coup or a civil war or widespread civil unrest all got a lot higher this week.

This was the moment of truth for all the "take Trump seriously, not literally" and "he just wants to be a Good President with a Good Legacy" and "a pivot is coming" morons. Turns out Trump is what we thought he was, an authoritarian.

Page 53 of 5382

First

3 33 43 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 63 73 103 153 253 553 1053

Last

...

Page 53 of 5382

First

3 33 43 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 63 73 103 153 253 553 1053

Last