Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

10-24-2018 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Classic deplorables, amirite guys?

Think of all the sympathy votes this will provide. Scale of 1-10, how excited are you all right now? It's okay, you're among friends, no need to downplay it.
**** off

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Nobody with an ounce of sense and no ulterior motive actually thinks a democratic sympathizer would send bombs in the mail to members of their own party to drum up some support leading into midterms. People who do this sort of thing are simply deranged. Their motivations only make sense to them.
take a look at all the red hatters in ur stupid country and ask them, 9 out of 10 will outright believe this is a false flag already. same people who were convinced obama wasnt an american and that hillary did ****ing satanic rituals. Probably believed dinosaurs never existed either

Last edited by Kirbynator; 10-24-2018 at 02:02 PM.
10-24-2018 , 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Just think about how hard it's going to be to respond to your average deplorable who is like "Democrat false flag op to send themselves bombs to distract from their disastrous inaction on the migrant caravan emergency crisis," you'd literally have to spend the next 6 months untangling that mess of ****.
I'm so happy I'm voting today in a dumb Canadian election where nobody has party affiliation.
10-24-2018 , 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Thing to bear in mind is this guy is likely to be a Rush listener given the target list. I’d expect a modern alt-right Breitbart guy to go after MSNBC, Kamala Harris, Liz Warren, David Hogg etc. —people more relevant to today’s politics. The folks getting bombs are all fixtures of 90’s politics that Rush loves to obsess over. Like, whoever I listen to Rush he’s blubbering about Wasserman-Schultz and Maxine Waters.
The Wasserman-Schultz bomb was actually meant for Holder but the address was wrong and the terrorist put Wasserman-Schultz as the return address so it went to her.
10-24-2018 , 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
He's just boring now. Just need to read the first sentence of a post to know what he's going to say and it's exactly what you think.
bull****, no1 on earth could've predicted the nostrils thing
10-24-2018 , 02:00 PM
I used to have trouble telling Inso0 from other rightwingers so I had to invent a mnemonic: o0 are dino0 nostrils.
10-24-2018 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
The Wasserman-Schultz bomb was actually meant for Holder but the address was wrong and the terrorist put Wasserman-Schultz as the return address so it went to her.
Either way, how often do you hear DWS mentioned in the derposphere? But RUsh namechecks her all the time —I think it’s a tell.
10-24-2018 , 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
bull****, no1 on earth could've predicted the nostrils thing
very good point
10-24-2018 , 02:09 PM

Last edited by champstark; 10-24-2018 at 02:10 PM. Reason: fixed
10-24-2018 , 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
The weird thing is that there are literally zero prominent democrats "playing the victim" like Inso0 is so sure that it is a thing that is actually happening. Reality doesn't matter, people like inso0 just create their own.
Give it a day or two.

Did you see the move "First Man"? There's a scene in it where the astronauts are at a funeral reception for one of the guys who died in the Apollo disaster and I think it was Buzz Aldrin who speaks up and says something along the lines, "So this guy was supposed to command the first landing mission... who do you think gets it now?" and the mood in the room shifts to the obvious reaction which is, "Dude, too soon.."

They were thinking it, though.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
bull****, no1 on earth could've predicted the nostrils thing
The modern take on this nostrils topic is fake news, but I roll with it because it's just part of the 2p2 charm at this point.
10-24-2018 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by synth_floyd
How long until "Well they deserved it anyway"?
I assume you mean from Trump? Because that’s already happening across the right wing derposphere.
10-24-2018 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Classic deplorables, amirite guys?

Think of all the sympathy votes this will provide. Scale of 1-10, how excited are you all right now? It's okay, you're among friends, no need to downplay it.
LOL
10-24-2018 , 02:25 PM
watching this press conference ... damn the criminal in chief is one fat fk. you can tell he's gained at least 15 pounds this year.
10-24-2018 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Give it a day or two.

Did you see the move "First Man"? There's a scene in it where the astronauts are at a funeral reception for one of the guys who died in the Apollo disaster and I think it was Buzz Aldrin who speaks up and says something along the lines, "So this guy was supposed to command the first landing mission... who do you think gets it now?" and the mood in the room shifts to the obvious reaction which is, "Dude, too soon.."

They were thinking it, though.
In other words: "Okay so maybe it hasn't happened like I said, but in lieu of reality supporting my position, here's a movie scene where you can substitute Democrats in for the douchebag astronauts"

lol dino nostrils, always and forever
10-24-2018 , 02:36 PM
I thought it was well established that deplorables project their ****ty behaviors onto others to justify being ****ty in their minds?
10-24-2018 , 02:38 PM
Trump literally told people to kill Clinton if she got elected because there was no other way to stop her appointing judges. Why this was not talked about more and isn't now...I have no idea. It should be the lead quote in every story.
10-24-2018 , 02:41 PM
LMAO Cuomo, what a moron



Quote:
A Cuomo spokesperson now says that the suspicious package previously thought to be an explosive device is actually just some "computer files" related to the Proud Boys.
He just wants to be seen as relevant so ****ing bad
10-24-2018 , 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
I thought it was well established that deplorables project their ****ty behaviors onto others to justify being ****ty in their minds?
Where does the line get drawn, though? Does projection make the deplorable, or is the deplorable the only one capable of projection? Are you giving me permission here to label FlyWf as the most racist person in the history of mankind, given how freely and nonsensically he throws out racially charged accusations? Or half of the 2p2 regs, for that matter.

Just trying to understand the rules here.
10-24-2018 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by realDonaldTrump

( twitter | raw text )

He’s at that stage where he’s promising anything to get votes

But he actually pushed for and signed business and rich tax cuts over middle class cuts; he actually pushed for health plans that don’t cover preexisting conditions

One can hope that nobody who was on the fence will believe this tweet and vote R because of it
10-24-2018 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Where does the line get drawn, though? Does projection make the deplorable, or is the deplorable the only one capable of projection? Are you giving me permission here to label FlyWf as the most racist person in the history of mankind, given how freely and nonsensically he throws out racially charged accusations? Or half of the 2p2 regs, for that matter.

Just trying to understand the rules here.
The real racists are the people calling out racism everybody. Case closed, we can all go home.
10-24-2018 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Where does the line get drawn, though? Does projection make the deplorable, or is the deplorable the only one capable of projection? Are you giving me permission here to label FlyWf as the most racist person in the history of mankind, given how freely and nonsensically he throws out racially charged accusations? Or half of the 2p2 regs, for that matter.

Just trying to understand the rules here.
Probably your parents and your upbringing made you deplorable.
10-24-2018 , 02:50 PM


On the subject of "unifying", let's take a look at Trump's most recent tweets with the word "Democrat" in them















I have not omitted any tweets (these are the 7 most recent with "Democrat"), and they go on and on and on like this.

"time to unify" lmao
10-24-2018 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer


On the subject of "unifying", let's take a look at Trump's most recent tweets with the word "Democrat" in them















I have not omitted any tweets (these are the 7 most recent with "Democrat"), and they go on and on and on like this.

"time to unify" lmao
Chuck and Nancy prolly on board though.
10-24-2018 , 02:56 PM

( twitter | raw text )
10-24-2018 , 02:57 PM
Unifying isn't finding common ground. It's getting inline behind Trump.
10-24-2018 , 03:00 PM
there were at least 3 typos on the envelope addressed to John Brennan. we can't rule out "intentional typos" Trump yet.

      
m