Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

07-13-2018 , 12:27 PM
I don't understand how trump can not take questions from cnn at will and declare they are fake news.
It's an official statement of the president,how are they allowed to be in the press pool if they are fake?
I wish T.May would have told him "here cnn isnt fake news and we answer to them" .
I don't understand how press can be allowed in the building if they are fake,that means they are not press,they are dangerous then?
Are there no rules that press that get in are authorized to ask questions?

off topic about trump NATO speech:
"Im a very stable genius" direct quote from the speech
07-13-2018 , 12:31 PM
Dammit, I think bobman is right.

http://inevitahillary.blogspot.com/2...gucci.html?m=1

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/w...ard-.html?_r=0

Quote:
The hacker who signed off as Guccifer (pronounced GUCCI-fer) — a nom de guerre coined, he said, to combine “the style of Gucci and the light of Lucifer” — turned out to be Marcel-Lehel Lazar, a jobless 43-year-old former taxi driver.
Still gonna be Guccifer like Lucifer for me, though.

Edit: That is a terribly unclear pronunciation guide.
07-13-2018 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by weeeez
I don't understand how trump can not take questions from cnn at will and declare they are fake news.
It's an official statement of the president,how are they allowed to be in the press pool if they are fake?
I wish T.May would have told him "here cnn isnt fake news and we answer to them" .
I don't understand how press can be allowed in the building if they are fake,that means they are not press,they are dangerous then?
Are there no rules that press that get in are authorized to ask questions?

off topic about trump NATO speech:
"Im a very stable genius" direct quote from the speech
it's been established that trump misuses the english language so that when he describes something as "fake", he means "unflattering".

he doesn't want to feel challenged or to feel embarrassed by people bringing up his previous moronic words and actions, so he disregards journalists who he believes will cast him in an unflattering light. probably because he's a weak little baby

07-13-2018 , 12:34 PM


07-13-2018 , 12:35 PM
Loved me some Gucci Crew II

07-13-2018 , 12:36 PM


07-13-2018 , 12:36 PM
Roger Stone will be going to jail (he’ll get a pardon obv):

07-13-2018 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
this seems both symbolic and strategic. 1) further legitimize mueller probe, 2) lay waste to trump's claims that russia wasn't involved in election meddling, 3) potentially create a rift between bff putin and trump ahead of their little summit

there's more money laundering charges in this, and i'd bet the house on them being able to capture certain americans in the web
The timing on this should send a message to team Trump(the Republican Party). Who ever convinced to Trump to appoint Roesenstein DAG deserves the medal of Honor.
07-13-2018 , 12:46 PM
Is guccifer 2.0 the fsb agents or someone else? What’s the difference between 1.0 and 2.0?
07-13-2018 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger

https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1017762869381754881
Memories of civility



Pretty sure Obama's people never called them "fake news" though.

Also I'd have no problem with the next Dem president ripping Fox's press creds. **** 'em.
07-13-2018 , 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk_nuts
Who ever convinced to Trump to appoint Roesenstein DAG deserves the medal of Honor.
Not so fast my friend.

07-13-2018 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330


How do you get congress to impeach themselves?

They're obviously super complicit,just look at the ****show yesterday. I'm sure those yelling the loudest are the ones closest with the Russians
07-13-2018 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markbris1
Is guccifer 2.0 the fsb agents or someone else? What’s the difference between 1.0 and 2.0?

afaik guccifer 2.0 wasn't one person but was an alias created by some senior GRU officers (some or all of whom i presume are named in these indictments today)

allegedly at some point there was a VPN malfunction of some sort that left an IP log traced back to one of the GRU headquarters in moscow, i believe
07-13-2018 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by epcfast
Yes! This is exactly what we need to be doing to visibly oppose the Trump administration and stand up for what our countr... oh, this is happening somewhere else? While everybody here is just sitting on their asses and swapping "oh snap!" tweets about some absolutely pointless congressional hearing?

**** you, America. You have the president you deserve.
07-13-2018 , 01:02 PM
gotta Love Spanky being in this thread.
07-13-2018 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spidercrab


Has to be Nunes or Chafetzzzz
07-13-2018 , 01:02 PM
that's pretty much true but it's worth pointing out that they have the luxury of having one single event to all rally for, while we have to deal with this **** every ****ing day
07-13-2018 , 01:03 PM
Why not just out whichever scumbag congressman ("conspirator") that is?

Also, HOW ARE THEY NOT LEAKING ANY OF THIS!!!
07-13-2018 , 01:05 PM
Pretty sure there are far, far more people protesting across the entirety of the United States, over the entirety of Trump's presidency. Easier to get a big crowd for a one-time event. But, I agree to an extent. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
07-13-2018 , 01:06 PM
So Russia started targeting the Democrats after Trump gave his "Russia if you're listening hack the Democrats" speech?
07-13-2018 , 01:07 PM
I will nutt out so hard if it’s Nunes.
07-13-2018 , 01:07 PM
07-13-2018 , 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
Why not just out whichever scumbag congressman ("conspirator") that is?

Also, HOW ARE THEY NOT LEAKING ANY OF THIS!!!
Why would they leak anything? Their job is easiest if they keep all the suspects in the dark for as long as possible.
07-13-2018 , 01:08 PM
yea thats not what that means
07-13-2018 , 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
Why not just out whichever scumbag congressman ("conspirator") that is?

Also, HOW ARE THEY NOT LEAKING ANY OF THIS!!!
probably dana roarabaccher but it’d be funnier if it were nunes or gaetz

      
m