We were saying the same things about O'Reilly and they didn't miss a beat without him. They're all replacement level propagandists.
Lots of people can do O'Reily's shouty-guy shtick. Tucker Carlson, for example. What Hannity does is imo really hard to do. That man can endlessly fire off talking points from the top of his head for minutes. I don't know how he manages to breathe.
Interesting article about Trump's bodyguard Keith Schiller, with some funny lines. If this guy goes down next (after Cohen) or flips, Trump is probably done for.
Interesting article about Trump's bodyguard Keith Schiller, with some funny lines. If this guy goes down next (after Cohen) or flips, Trump is probably done for.
Please let this happen. There are so many movie ideas coming up for directors all over Hollywood because of the Trump fiasco.
Interesting article about Trump's bodyguard Keith Schiller, with some funny lines. If this guy goes down next (after Cohen) or flips, Trump is probably done for.
In this case, it is probably going to depend on the context and the state you are in. I don’t really know because this never comes up in the area of law in which I practice. You would want to check the statute governing the privilege from the state you are in and then the case law regarding that statute to see whether a similar situation had been addressed before.
Here is the language from Florida: Here’s the definition of a client:
I forgot to mention that federal courts and state courts will be different.
I cannot stand Jim Comey and want to punch his lying face.
This mother****er is only the least bit sympathetic because he was dumb and failed at his corrupt attempt at self preservation. He's a POS deserving of nothing but scorn and shame.
I cannot stand Jim Comey and want to punch his lying face.
This mother****er is only the least bit sympathetic because he was dumb and failed at his corrupt attempt at self preservation. He's a POS deserving of nothing but scorn and shame.
On a corruption scale of Obama to Trump, Comey ranks about a Debbie Wasserman Schultz. ****ty, but could be a lot worse.
I think Avanti's take on the Cohen-Hannity relationship is the right one.
Hannity was never a client of Cohen, but there is some document or recorded conversation about non-legal issues that makes them/Trump look bad (something like Hannity and Trump coordinating coverage) that they don't want to get out. By claiming Hannity was a client, the hope is that the document will be withheld as privileged.
This also explains why Cohen's team wants to do the privilege screen themselves. It's pretty easy to withhold a communication with a client, even if it's not about legal issues when you are the only one reviewing - only way the document would be discovered is if the DOJ challenges the specific document and then judge reviews it and determines not privileged. However, if taint team does the review, they would be able to tell it is about a non-legal matter.
Michael Avanatti and Tim O'Brien (author of Trumpnation: the art of the Donald) both said last night on Lawrence O'Donnells show that they expect Cohen to be charged within 90 days, and facing possible decades in prison he will flip on Trump. That would be pretty incredible imo.
Side note: it's amazing how Avanatti has positioned himself to have a prominent spot on the political shows covering everything Cohen/Trump.
Trying to understand Hannity's take on the matter. He's never paid Cohen, isn't being represented by him in any legal matters, not really a client in the classic sense. But he still wants attorney-client privilege? Is that it?