Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
As if Buckley, Reagan and etc weren’t embarrassing racist clowns! We need to stop humoring this belief that there’s ever been an intellectual core to conservatism. Guys like George Will trot out the name Buckley and we on the left politely assume there must be some intellectual heft behind conservatism because we’re unwilling to admit that a huge chunk of polite society is deplorable. We have to believe that our Republican friends and neighbors aren’t that terrible, and then we’re shocked when Trump wins.
Stop it. Stop pretending Buckley wasn’t a vile segregationist and Reagan wasn’t a dishonest senile buffoon. You can absolutely see the seeds of Trumpism in these people.
As you note, the way in which the "left" and liberals tried to shine these people up and make them righteous counter-parties for The Discourse is also suggestive of a deeper, more systemic problem. Or how we allowed Reagan to be sanctified. How the same is happening to George W. Bush, where he is redeemed and where his legacy is normalized and war crimes intentionally forgotten (lol he gave Michelle Obama candy, what a sweet heart!)
Why we have a political system in which many in the opposition party are so wedded to doing this over generations now is worth examining. I think we focus too much on the overt stupidity of Trump and not enough on the systemic failures that led to it.
The blunt reality is that we pay too much respect to these guardians and centrists who grant all this credibility and cachet to obvious ghoulish racist **** on the right. And we should realize that underlying it is a certain consciousness. It's intentional. They aren't making mistakes, it's not an accident. I am sure I am came off as a horrible scold in the thread about Tucker but it's critical that the left gets woke to this fact that they are granting a lot of institutional gravitas to people who are ultimately guardians to the white supremacist gestalt and are effectively running interference for it.
It's a clever, high-end, non-confrontational semi-bluff. The guardians pay lip service to cosmopolitan, pluralist, racially egalitarian ideals to blunt criticism from their left or to shield themselves from criticism, then launder their white supremacist impulses onto hapless stooges on the right who lead the movement and play front-line soldiers in the theater of political operations.
I think this is hardly really ground-breaking though, but that's the reason why we have a political party and a movement increasingly fascistic and racially aggressive but institutions sort of fail to corral it, AND a bewildered opposition that can point to stuff like "social norms" around racial egalitarianism and non-discrimination that seemingly should be doing all this heavy lifting but is basically ineffective. Bluntly, the social norms are a con and many of the frankly white elites mouthing platitudes simply do not internalize them and instead their affinities are really wound up in white racial anxiety or patriarchal interests, too, but they're just lying about it. So glibly, they invest themselves into making William F Buckley (or Erick Erickson or whatever) socially acceptable because they know the Fourteen Words aren't.
The left's social justice project got two things out of the Civil Rights era: it got statutory protections and it pushed overt white supremacy to the subliminal boundaries. And only partially subliminal, a lot of the people who behave as if they deny their white identity and how their social value is wrapped up in it are basic liars and not that clever about it.
I think we should still cherish those victories. I mean statutory victories and making racism at least superficially shameful are better than Jim Crow and minstrel shows or whatever. But we should not lose sight of the fact these were very partial victories and lots of white elites are absolutely still seething about it but do a halfway decent job of masking it. Personally, I don't know if this is precisely true, but I still cling to the notion it's largely a Boomer problem and their kids are better and when the Boomers die off over the next 40 years it will be incrementally better still, someday.
Last edited by DVaut1; 11-15-2018 at 07:19 PM.