Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

09-21-2018 , 10:53 PM
WHAT TIMELINE AM I IN NOW? I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ANYMORE



Last edited by wheatrich; 09-21-2018 at 11:00 PM.
09-21-2018 , 11:03 PM
Fox Viewers heads smoldering tonight.
09-21-2018 , 11:10 PM
Kind of amazing the power Hannity has right now. He's basically a voice in Donald's head that tells him what to do.
09-21-2018 , 11:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Kind of amazing the power Hannity has right now. He's basically a voice in Donald's head that tells him what to do.
If this was the plot on a network political tv show it would be far too stupid to watch.
09-21-2018 , 11:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Kind of amazing the power Hannity has right now. He's basically a voice in Donald's head that tells him what to do.
But he only has that power so long as he tells Trump exactly what he wants to hear. I think the Tolstoy view of history is essentially correct: these great powerful figures like Hannity and Trump are just surfing on a churned-up wave of millions of frothed-up deplorables. Their ability to actually direct the flow of history is limited.
09-21-2018 , 11:21 PM

( twitter | raw text )
09-21-2018 , 11:22 PM
Lol at that tweet following Trolly's post.
09-21-2018 , 11:40 PM
"And so there was no one cause for that occurrence, but it had to occur because it had to. Millions of men, renouncing their human feelings and reason, had to go from west to east to slay their fellows, just as some centuries previously hordes of men had come from the east to the west, slaying their fellows.

The actions of Napoleon and Alexander, on whose words the event seemed to hang, were as little voluntary as the actions of any soldier who was drawn into the campaign by lot or by conscription. This could not be otherwise, for in order that the will of Napoleon and Alexander (on whom the event seemed to depend) should be carried out, the concurrence of innumerable circumstances was needed without any one of which the event could not have taken place. It was necessary that millions of men in whose hands lay the real power—the soldiers who fired, or transported provisions and guns—should consent to carry out the will of these weak individuals, and should have been induced to do so by an infinite number of diverse and complex causes."
09-22-2018 , 12:28 AM
What is the ratio of trump public rallys in his first two years of office versus the combined number for all other presidents? Is infinity involved?
09-22-2018 , 01:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Like every single other thing these people do, it's nothing but projection
I don't know why that quote hit me so hard, but it's like it all makes sense when before I never really understood the root of the white "pride" movement. I kinda feel stupid b/c it seems so obvious now. They just don't want to be treated how they treat other people.
09-22-2018 , 02:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoppaTMan
So is everyone upset because the NYT Rosenstein piece is inaccurate, or that they ran it at all?

I don't find it surprising that someone deep into the law and order track (RIP) of the conservative legal world would have the right combination of integrity and political naivete to try to foment discussion of 25th'ing Trump. It's a rational response to an unrepentant narcissist having the power of the oval office.
if Rosenstein didn't earnestly discuss and plan, taping and 25th'ing Trump, he should be impeached.
09-22-2018 , 02:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
What is the ratio of trump public rallys in his first two years of office versus the combined number for all other presidents? Is infinity involved?
It's bizarre, baffling and sickening. It's very Hitlerish. POTUS on a perpetual MAGA campaign tour is completely normalized.
09-22-2018 , 02:33 AM
It kind of lends credence to the idea that there is a group of people in the White House working against him - "send the idiot out to another of those ****ing rallies - if he's shouting at the rubes he's not accidentally starting WW III here"

At least, I hope it's something like that.....

MM MD
09-22-2018 , 02:37 AM
About the red wave and them sure of midterm victory (so that some won show up to vote) and everyone in this thread laughing at this:
Blue wave victory is not certain but ,by the same logic there will be no show at the urns by overconfident opponents. (i.e you will never learn)

Also can't wait to see reaction itt when republicans wins by 80 or 90% by rigging the polls and its gg
Honestly that is a possibility and pretty sure would that happen you wouldnt move a finger to change it.
09-22-2018 , 03:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
Why resign if you didn’t do anything wrong bro?

Is that district competitive?
Yes. It's in the St Cloud area (which is in Michelle Bachman's old district), but this particular district is competitive.
09-22-2018 , 04:07 AM


https://twitter.com/AdamParkhomenko/...844701185?s=19
09-22-2018 , 04:10 AM
I think that if there’s clear riggage or shenanigans bolder than run of the mill suppression, that will be a sure signs that it’s time to leave
09-22-2018 , 05:18 AM
Looking forward to the 1000th post from our new, high-volume, and always on-topic poster "RealDonaldTrump"! Coming soon, and sure to be a doozy.
09-22-2018 , 06:43 AM
That anti-Gosar spot is the best negative ad I've ever seen. There's a two minute version on youtube which twists the knife a little deeper. Good stuff.

As for Rosenstein, I think this is more of the same that we've seen from the NYT op-ed and the Woodward book. People saw Trump in action in the White House and they were mortified. They were dumbfounded. And there was probably quite a bit of brainstorming about possible courses of action. Don't know where all of this is headed, but pretty likely its going somewhere we've never been before.
09-22-2018 , 06:52 AM
lol that ad with gosar's family

absolutely rekt

nothing more powerful than your own family saying you're a scumbag POS
09-22-2018 , 07:34 AM
The idea that there is a cabal of Trumpkins working against him from the inside should scare the hell out of people. Such people are stupid and venal enough to work for Trump in the first place and to continue doing so even though they know he is a danger to the world and they are trying to get rid of him through some sort of coup ...
09-22-2018 , 10:01 AM

( twitter | raw text )
09-22-2018 , 10:57 AM

( twitter | raw text )
09-22-2018 , 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoppaTMan
So is everyone upset because the NYT Rosenstein piece is inaccurate, or that they ran it at all?

I don't find it surprising that someone deep into the law and order track (RIP) of the conservative legal world would have the right combination of integrity and political naivete to try to foment discussion of 25th'ing Trump. It's a rational response to an unrepentant narcissist having the power of the oval office.
People are upset because they think it could help the whitehouse do something they want to do. So obv it can’t be true, story is coming from WH Trump loyalists etc. Basically Bush did 9/11 thinking.
09-22-2018 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecriture d'adulte
People are upset because they think it could help the whitehouse do something they want to do. So obv it can’t be true, story is coming from WH Trump loyalists etc. Basically Bush did 9/11 thinking.
Yeah thinking Bush did 9/11 and thinking the Trump WH giving this story to the media are basically the same thing

      
m