Again, lol at thinking the Mueller investigation substantially helps Democrats get elected. I know you are smarter than that.

Jesus ****ing Christ this **** isn't hard. Campaign on Medicare for all, getting money out of politics, and screwing over the 1% or whatever you want to call them these days.

Jim Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Baker Mayfield, the endless Oklahoma clown parade is endless

( twitter | raw text )

I think if Trump lives long enough (to like 85+) he's a slight dog to go to prison, a slight favorite to have a criminal conviction, and likely to be broke.

Haha my boy got gumped. The Forrest gifs overwhelmed the tweet.

I think the investigation helps as long as the dems don't make it the main thing, so maybe it doesn't help.

omg not this again

The CA tweet is obviously only made about a state that won't vote for him.

What a pathetic piece of ****, intentionally trying to hurt people in desperate situations in states that don’t support him. My father in law, a “centrist Democrat” (voted Republican through McCain, then consistently straight ticket D since the Tea Party) told me that he was a little concerned that Ds would seek retribution on Trump supporters when they took power. I told him I sincerely had no idea what he was talking about, we really wanted health care, etc. for the benefit of all and that would not change.

As they continue to support Trump as he pulls this vile, disgusting crap, I am actually starting to feel retribution is warranted.

Interesting thread on why polling data is valuable

un****ing real

It’s really hard to target Trump supporters without also hurting lots of good people. Like as much as I’d like to tell confederate states to get rekt, there are tons of poor minorities who would suffer immensely. I think the best option is to just remember who these people are and shame them until they die.

I think it can be absolutely helpful if framed properly: that it shows Trump as one of the bad guy elites getting away with gritting and other law-breaking; and that it shows him as untrustworthy “no collusion?”

Talk of treason is not going to resonate with anyone already not voting D, nor will impeachment minus certain prerequisites being met (assuming the Senate won’t remove him)

How is it even possible to fact check something as subjective as assigning blame?

He is so spicy on the forest thing! I don't know how much has been sent and how much more we need, but I hope we're in a position where Newsom can tell him to eat a bowl of dicks.

junkie president

CA with its Dem Governor and Dem supermajority in the legislature is obviously running an "extraordinary surplus".

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics...t-13392995.php

The adderall armchair theorizing smells very pizzagate.

not very subjective when the president goes on nat'l tv saying he'll happily own the blame/responsibility with his wall demand

Except he sniffs 4 times a minute which is like any person with a sniffing addiction I've ever seen and was known to do cocaine in the 80s. So, actually not very pizzagate. I'm not saying he is an addict but people are talking.

So says you. I'll wait for Clovis's take on this.

Take off hoser.

You're implying that you think that Hillary Clinton and George Soros raping and selling children in the basement of a pizza restaurant is roughly as likely as Trump being addicted to pills.

Oh well with that level of medical diagnosis I stand corrected.

Bernie couldn't even win a Democratic primary on that platform. Maybe this time it will be different.

Actually, this time it definitely will be different, and your platform can certainly win, but it's largely because the GOP is crippled by Trump's rampant ineptitude, corruption and criminality, and the exposure of those things is very beneficial for Democrats.