Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: Harm to Ongoing Matter The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: Harm to Ongoing Matter

04-18-2019 , 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
OPEC ****ed us + Nixon Shock
Also the Bronx was burning, NYC was a graffiti-covered hellscape, the Hollywood sign was falling down, ****ty-ass astroturf stadiums with zero character went up everywhere, American cars were lucky to last 80k miles, every new building was some horribly ugly brutalist nightmare that literally scratched you if you touched it.

Paul McCartney released "Wonderful Christmastime".

It's like we just gave up on everything.
04-18-2019 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Henry, see what I said above about how Trump can use the power of the office along with continued voter suppression going on. In a free/fair election, the Dems win in a landslide (almost) no matter what. I have no expectation of 2020 being a free/fair election.
Well Scott Walker wasn't able to stop himself from losing his only election since 1991, even with the legislature and the judiciary on his side. And Rick Snyder couldn't either. GA is screwed though. And probably FL too. I really think there's a decent chance at 269-269.

Trump, even if he loses, probably won't step down gracefully.
04-18-2019 , 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I also don’t think there is any evidence impeaching him will somehow hand him the election.
Nobody aside from politics nerds really cares about Mueller and Russian collusion. The polls show it doesn't connect well with voters because it doesn't have a tangible effect on their lives like health care and taxes do.

Impeachment will bring every deplorable out of the woodwork to vote while not upping turnout for the Dems.
04-18-2019 , 04:35 PM
The only possible upside of 4 more years of Trump is that while it's easy for a sitting president to get re-elected - it seems like everyone is sick of them by year 6. Bush II lost a massive landslide in the year-6 midterms - and the economic crisis hadn't even started yet. People were just sick of seeing his face.

If Trump gets voted out, he retires to the sweet grift still super popular among his base. If he gets re-elected - yes he destroys the country - BUT, even the base will get kind of sick of him by year 6. So we have that going for us.
04-18-2019 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Oh come on. The logical extension of this, that a Dem Congress can hypothetically run around for two years doing terrible things that everyone hates and then bear no blame whatsoever when the Dem presidential candidate loses, is plainly idiotic.

(plus, the job of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is not to get the president elected, did you mean the DNC?)
Yes dnc and that is not the logical extension of my argument that’s the Reductio ad Absurdum version of it. Of course they play a role, it’s just not suppose to be their primary goal.

Last edited by Clovis8; 04-18-2019 at 04:50 PM.
04-18-2019 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
I have no expectation of 2020 being a free/fair election.
Russia's going to go ham interfering wherever they can.
04-18-2019 , 04:37 PM
What Bob said.
04-18-2019 , 04:38 PM

( twitter | raw text )
04-18-2019 , 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Russia's going to go ham interfering wherever they can.
Yup... and Israel... and Saudi Arabia... and God knows who else.
04-18-2019 , 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Russia's going to go ham interfering wherever they can.
No question I fully expect Russia to be openly involved in collusion to an even greater degree than they were in 2016.
04-18-2019 , 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Russia's going to go ham interfering wherever they can.

Do you think China will also ? They would be better off without Trump I think
04-18-2019 , 04:55 PM
Whitewater ended up as a sex scandal and BJ. People didn't give a **** about that.

Dems need to put Trump on trial and keep him there until the next election. Keep him occupied so he can't campaign. Reps put HClinton on trial for years with Bengazi bull**** to poison her name. Keep this **** in the news. Trump is going to get his 35-40% diehards. Make the bubble voter swallow REAL hard. It's

Dems are so weak they won't take the road even when it's laid out for them. Mueller smacked them across the face, telling them it's their Constitutional job, and they will still decline. If the Dems don't make their case, low information voters will figure there was no case to be made.
04-18-2019 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
OPEC ****ed us + Nixon Shock
And Nixon, from the party of financial prudence, decided to pass the buck on dealing with inflation and left it to Carter/Volcker to raise the interest rates and take the temporary hit in order to get things under control.
04-18-2019 , 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Turned on Fox for like 30 seconds, the lower third was about how Mueller found no evidence of a crime by Trump, and they were discussing how the Dems were going to impeach for pure partisan gain.
What kind of content do you think Fox and Breitbart will be running during the election if there isn't an impeachment? I would guess that it's nonstop coverage of whatever Emails 2.0 turns out to be.
04-18-2019 , 05:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
What kind of content do you think Fox and Breitbart will be running during the election if there isn't an impeachment? I would guess that it's nonstop coverage of whatever Emails 2.0 turns out to be.
**** they'll still roll with emails 1.0.
04-18-2019 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NhlNut
Dems need to put Trump on trial and keep him there until the next election. Keep him occupied so he can't campaign. Reps put HClinton on trial for years with Bengazi bull**** to poison her name. Keep this **** in the news.
There's a fundamental difference between the parties though, I don't know if Dems can win by just employing the same tactics that Rs do.

Like, consider that a statement like "parties should come together and work out bipartisan solutions" probably has mainstream agreement in the Democratic Party, and like 1,000 people in the Republican Party who agree (and all live in suburban DC). Poisoning HRC worked because there was a ready audience for that stuff, but Trump is already radioactive to non-CHUDs, a little more poison isn't going to push them over the edge.
04-18-2019 , 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
I think Trump is probably a favorite to win re-election right now, all things considered.
Just curious if any old school politards know how Obummer was polling in Spring 2010 against various GOP contenders, cuz Trump consistently trails the Democrat right now by 3-7 points depending on who it is.
04-18-2019 , 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Schiff's statement just now was straight fire.

https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/st...85130763259919
04-18-2019 , 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
What kind of content do you think Fox and Breitbart will be running during the election if there isn't an impeachment? I would guess that it's nonstop coverage of whatever Emails 2.0 turns out to be.
They'll be covering the investigation into the Democratic nominee for whatever Trump tells Barr to investigate him or her for, as well as accusing AOC of wanting to slaughter all of the cows.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
Just curious if any old school politards know how Obummer was polling in Spring 2010 against various GOP contenders, cuz Trump consistently trails the Democrat right now by 3-7 points depending on who it is.
I don't remember, but I don't think the polling matters much yet. I fully expect the Democratic nominee to lead Trump handily once the primary is wrapped up... I'm worried about voter suppression, the aforementioned bogus investigation, and collusion 2.0.
04-18-2019 , 05:32 PM

( twitter | raw text )
04-18-2019 , 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
Just curious if any old school politards know how Obummer was polling in Spring 2010 against various GOP contenders, cuz Trump consistently trails the Democrat right now by 3-7 points depending on who it is.
I looked up 2011 to better compare with where we are in the current presidency:
"Republican Candidate" Extends Lead vs. Obama to 47% to 39% - 7/14/11

"Generic" Republican Continues to Lead Obama in 2012 Vote
Lead is 46% to 38% among registered voters
- 10/14/11
04-18-2019 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by realDonaldTrump

( twitter | raw text )
"I chose not to."

More like Don McGahn chose not to.
04-18-2019 , 05:35 PM
lol imagine quoting jesse watters when trying to make a serious point
04-18-2019 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
So basically Trump is losing by less now than Obama was at this point in his presidency? I may need to rethink my last post...
04-18-2019 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by realDonaldTrump

( twitter | raw text )
Mr. President, you're the greatest president we've ever had. Best ever. Way better than Vernon. You've never obstructed or colluded and that's why we all love you, and we all know your real approval rating is 99% and the other 1% are just haters and losers who don't appreciate your stunning good looks and always presidential behavior. The only thing I wish is that you would tweet a little more. Enjoy your second term! MAGA!

PS. - Please don't throw me in jail or kill me during your second all-powerful term for all the things I said about you before. I promise that when they get me at some anti-you protest, I'll have been there undercover trying to catch all the bad liberals who hate you for no reason. Just re-read this post if you think about jailing me, and it'll all be okay.

      
m