Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
Well, yes because it's using people as pawns, but I don't think anyone is panicking about the idea of sanctuary cities taking people. Axios has a reactions roundup from various mayors. Only three (Chicago, Philadelphia and Cambridge) have openly said "bring it on" but nobody has indicated they would be unwilling to accept people.
Well, yeah I get that he is a POS for several reasons in terms of motivation. His narrative is obviously that these are dangerous people and they will damage the community that takes them in. If he really believes that, then he is not only using them as pawns, he is actively trying to harm American cities to punish his political enemies by releasing rapists and gang members upon citizens, including his own supporters (that distinction only highlights the complete depravity). That the immigrant hoard narrative is bull**** and logical, non racist people understand that is beside that point. Further, that he would be actually helping these refugees get out of a system of torment and persecution and into a sympathetic and relatively protective space is also not the point. If he was pushing a kid out of a window with the hope that they land on someone he hates, and inadvertently saves the kid from a fire inside the building, he is still a piece of ****. (Get it, violator? Oh yeah, you always did)
But what I mean is the right is going hard saying that this is actually a great plan and exposing the hypocrisy of the left, yet I can’t find anyone saying that they are against the actual idea. Is this remarkable? No. I just feel like there has been a palpable change this month to where the propaganda machine is going with literal whole cloth fabrication fake news regularly. Like straight up.
Last edited by Johnny Truant; 04-13-2019 at 11:59 PM.