so Trump gonna go the route of saying it's not a big deal with Robert Kraft or I hardly knew the guy who was right next to him talking with Shinzo Abe awhile back.

Later Inso0 making a strong argument against earlier Inso0 in favor of LOL INSOs

Accepting this at absolute face value, my response would be the Louis CK trope I mentioned earlier in the thread. Of course it's horrible that someone would be arrested for and criminally convicted and sent to prison for having a small amount of pot, but MAYBE this person with a criminal past should take a hint from Fletcher Reede and knock that **** off.

Of course, extensive history of law enforcement in the USA would tell you that the reality of prison sentences for drug offenses is much different than some otherwise random innocent citizen being picked up for the first time with a small bag of weed. Arguing otherwise is ridiculous.

I thought sure you guys had him cornered into backing universal health care a few days ago. How did that end up?

Cant be a great inso take without a healthy dose of victim blaming

We're all just ****ing pawns in a game.



https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1099043020987609090

Shocker, didn't see that coming.

False reports leaked from the White House propaganda machine regarding the investigation reaching it's imminent completion?

Oh, my pearls! They are so clutched.

Just say no!

Pull yourself up by your bootstrap!

I can't see the the discrepancy in the sentencing lengths between minorities and whites for the exact same crimes because me head is so far up tRump's ass!

I didn't think it would take long for Inso to play the "maybe 'those people' should just behave themselves" card.

Lol, Inso. But really it’s no longer funny, inso has been posting in here like a decade and seems incapable of altering any of his opinions or beliefs despite constantly being proven wrong. Should be bannable, imo.

Honestly I think hilarity would ensue with an Inso shadow ban, but i'm 99% sure this forum software doesn't support it, *sigh*.

It is hysterical that many times now the Whitehouse has tried to force Mueller’s hand with these pronouncements. They will be a fun part of the eventual biopic.

Even today SHS was saying she’s confident the findings will show nothing soon. All the while it’s clear Trumo and his dumbest advisors keep thinking this is a good idea to leak that the report will be delivered soon. It is eventually followed up with Trump spaz tweeting about witch hunts and no collusion and then media stories confirming it was never true.

This scenario has played out how many times now? Quite a few. One time it will actually be right, sort of.

Trump has actively called for violence against the media.

In today's LOL America, Trump's 538 approval is 42.6; since March 2017, his approval has hit this mid to upper 42% range several times but this is essentially his peak since the initial honeymoon phase of his presidency ended. What a country we have here!

It’s not just the dime bag that does the kid in


Seriously listen to season 3 of serial. It might make you a more empathetic person.

Well given polling something around 80% of GOP voters support the declaration.

It's always been about all of them that support KING TRUMP THE FIRST.

First time possession with intent to distribute is not the same as someone minding their own business with a joint in his pocket, and yet both are classified as first time drug offenses for the purpose of that report.


Hilarious for who? Wookie, maybe, since he'd be the only one to know. I don't think you know how shadow bans work. I'd figure out after the second post that went without a goofyballer repsonse, so that jig would be up pretty quick on my end.

You could lobby to have me legit banned if you feel so strongly about it. I admit I don't quite understand the point of a completely single-minded forum, but whatever floats your boat.

It's not so much a single-minded forum as it is wanting people who just don't make **** up constantly.

I gave it a solid effort, but the only concrete data I could find about the state prison population of people who are in there without a charge more serious than marijuana possession was 0.3%. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/sisfcf04_q.pdf

It's pretty old data.

The FEDERAL data says that the number who are in for only drug possession (all drugs, no data for only marijuana) is 0.04%.

Definitely a major problem.


Edit: I still stand by the statement that even with these incredibly low figures, that doesn't mean stronger charges weren't plead down to possession. So for all I know the three tenths of one percent state number and four hundredths of one percent federal number still includes people who were actually busted for something more than just possession.

LOL "single-minded forum". Let's just quote this post again:

can i do what conservatives do and use my own experience as something to ruin all data?

i put a dude in prison for 4 years for 11 grams of marijuana.. i also got yelled at because the deal was below his minimum at the time.

So YOU'RE the one. You monster.

( twitter | raw text )

( twitter | raw text )

no way tiger or mj get arrested or even cited without it already getting leaked by now