Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: Harm to Ongoing Matter The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: Harm to Ongoing Matter

02-17-2019 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by realDonaldTrump

( twitter | raw text )
Being unprecedented is not a crime. Neither deaf oxy boy or rush Limbaugh explain why any of this is illegal.
02-17-2019 , 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
I cannot think of a single possible bad outcome

If Obama did this, republicans would be calling him an anti-semite
02-17-2019 , 06:59 PM
So so far today we have our great leader wanting snl and the media who criticizing him investigated and the investigators investigating him in jail. That coming poker boom or big pay raise form the trickle better pay for my early retirement.
02-17-2019 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
The silence was good but i liked the mocking laughter trump got better.

Easily my favorite moment of the MAGA hostage crisis so far

Side note can we stop referring to this as a presidency and start referring to it as ‘dumb angry old racist named Donald live-tweets the news’?

Admittedly a bit of a mouthful but still. Don’t want to keep diminishing the office of the president by referring to this farce as one
02-17-2019 , 07:13 PM
Why is everyone talking about a veto of a congressional disapproval resolution over the emergency declaration? Wouldn't Cocaine Mitch just not let the resolution come up for a vote in the first place?
02-17-2019 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
Why is everyone talking about a veto of a congressional disapproval resolution over the emergency declaration? Wouldn't Cocaine Mitch just not let the resolution come up for a vote in the first place?
If laws matter any more I'm pretty sure he's legally obligated to bring it up for a vote within 18 days of it passing the house or something like that.
02-17-2019 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuluck414
If laws matter any more I'm pretty sure he's legally obligated to bring it up for a vote within 18 days of it passing the house or something like that.
Wait, what?

He sat on the spending bill for how long after the new House passed it?
02-17-2019 , 07:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Wait, what?

He sat on the spending bill for how long after the new House passed it?
It would be a "privileged resolution".
Requiring a vote in the Senate.
02-17-2019 , 07:43 PM
...or else what?

I think there is enough Republican pressure and deference towards tradition that he will bring it up but if they decided to pull another Merrick Garland and just not vote on it I don't know if there's anything that could ultimately compel them to.
02-17-2019 , 07:45 PM

( twitter | raw text )
02-17-2019 , 07:53 PM
I know this has been argued before, and simplicitus is MIA, but I'm pretty sure that far and away the best possible out of a lot of bad possible outcomes would be somebody choking on a chicken nugget.
02-17-2019 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
It would be a "privileged resolution".

Requiring a vote in the Senate.

Popping in to shed a few tears over the big beautiful wall getting built?

Re: the Smollet thing I totally agree that deplorables don’t need to take from reality when they deny the existence of hate crimes, rape, etc but it’s incredibly stupid to give them even the tiniest bit of cover in a well publicized case like this. And on the other hand a conservative celebrity could stage an obviously fake attack by “Antifa” and be held up as a hero for life. I’m actually surprised this hasn’t happened yet, could use his/her second Amendment rights and everything to really sell it.
02-17-2019 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by realDonaldTrump

( twitter | raw text )
if i were innocent this is definitely not something i'd say about an ongoing investigation
02-17-2019 , 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25
That tweet is absolutely nuts...
To be absolutely nuts, he has to parrot these fascist jackasses without attribution. He's not there yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by realDonaldTrump

( twitter | raw text )
Um ok, nevermind.
02-17-2019 , 08:07 PM
lol did daddy get word of indictments? Please god lead out The Steve Miller Band in cuffs and I will never win again.
02-17-2019 , 08:11 PM
What drives me nuts is every time WOATUS makes these accusations he reveals himself to be an absolutely powerless figurehead or a complete liar, there is literally zero in between

Order the justice department to investigate the Dems you buffoon
02-17-2019 , 08:37 PM
Wooh I'm sure Trump's watching this McCabe interview, and I can feel his blood pressure rising from here. He will be rage tweeting tonight for sure and probably demanding Rosensteins head as well.
02-17-2019 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
so, yeah, appears there's a downside to adderall.
02-17-2019 , 10:08 PM
So are the Shepherds the "incredible, expensive equipment" he is referring to?
02-17-2019 , 10:09 PM
nobody knows
02-17-2019 , 10:12 PM
I took it to mean that the guy selling the expensive drug detecting equipment dissed his own product and took his place in the nearest bread line because german shepherds are better than the stuff he's selling.
02-17-2019 , 10:50 PM
Can you imagine being Avwal or DS and still thinking this guy is intelligent .

Last edited by Clovis8; 02-17-2019 at 11:14 PM.
02-17-2019 , 10:53 PM
Thinking Trump is intelligent is like thinking Trooper is a good poker player. He connects with his audience in a way that transcends what is actually happening.
02-17-2019 , 11:08 PM
Apparently the orange conman told the FBI he didn't care what the intelligence community found out, he believed Putin.

      
m