re: The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: State of Emergency
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
I could not be more hype for this book. Thinking of taking off work early.
From an Amazon review:
Quote:
Sims give quite clear information about how it turns out that the big leaker from the WH is KellyAnne Conway. She is the way she appears on the news networks, according to Sims, a cartoon character. “Her agenda—which was her survival over all others, including the president—became more and more transparent. Once you figured that out, everything about her seemed so calculated; every statement, even a seemingly innocuous one, seemed poll-tested by a focus group that existed inside her mind. She seemed to be peren¬nially cloaked in an invisible fur coat, casting an all-¬knowing smile, as if she’d collected 98 Dalmatians with only 3 more to go.”
re: The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: State of Emergency
Quote:
Originally Posted by alazo1985
I say this fully expecting to get trashed, but it needs to be said. I'm tired of seeing these people driving around celebrating and proudly displaying their old country's flag, and refusing to assimilate. THIS IS AMERICA, YOU CAN LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT.
I remember being in America and my mother's racist boyfriend countered about some point I made that if I didn't like America that I should leave it. I really embarrassed him when I pointed out that I actually did do that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
Wait, why is the SOTU back on?? I thought Nancy said she wouldn't do it until the government is open for good, and not while trump threatens another one.
What's Nancy's game here?
Why not allow a total wreck to make numerous unforced errors on a stage for the world to see?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
I could not be more hype for this book. Thinking of taking off work early.
I didn't know it existed until Trump pointed it out. Now I know what to get on Audible next.
re: The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: State of Emergency
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
Wait, why is the SOTU back on?? I thought Nancy said she wouldn't do it until the government is open for good, and not while trump threatens another one.
What's Nancy's game here?
I thought the reason stated for the postponement was security concerns related to the shutdown. I for one am looking forward to the eye rolls and other expressions from Pelosi who will be seated directly behind President Littlehands.
A new American intelligence assessment of global threats has concluded that North Korea is “unlikely to give up” all of its nuclear stockpiles, and that Iran is not “currently undertaking the key nuclear weapons-development activity” needed to make a bomb, directly contradicting two top tenets of President Trump’s foreign policy.
Daniel R. Coats, the director of national intelligence, also challenged Mr. Trump’s insistence that the Islamic State had been defeated, a key rationale for his decision to exit from Syria. The terror group, the annual “Worldwide Threat Assessment” report to Congress concluded, “still commands thousands of fighters in Iraq and Syria,” and maintain eight branches and a dozen networks around the world.
re: The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: State of Emergency
The best part about the SOTU is Pelosi will be sitting behind Trump. I can see Trump going off topic and starting an argument with her when Pence claps but she doesn't on some deplorable topic.
re: The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: State of Emergency
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerodox
Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General:
"We agreed to do more to step up – and now we see the results. By the end of next year, NATO allies will add $100 billion extra toward defense," he said. "So we see some real money and some real results. And we see that the clear message from President Donald Trump is having an impact."
From the USA Today article I cited above.
@ScreaminAsian, I read "NATO allies will add $100 billion" as allies other than the U.S. Now I see that could be U.S. and others combined. Not sure, but it appears to be a big deal to Stoltenberg.
Sorry but strategically the extra added money to defense actually makes NATO weaker, not stronger.
The SecGen was doubtless just blowing smoke up Trump's ass to make him less likely to abandon Article 5.