Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: Harm to Ongoing Matter The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: Harm to Ongoing Matter

01-21-2019 , 06:10 PM
chessmate!
01-21-2019 , 06:13 PM
What’s bad about trade deficits again, John?
01-21-2019 , 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by realDonaldTrump

( twitter | raw text )
I like him conflating the overt racism of the founding fathers with Martin Luther King.

I feel like Stephen Miller must write this **** with a car battery wired to his nipples.
01-21-2019 , 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Plus he swindled a cool hundred million out of Rhode Island, he should be in the business hall of fame too.
His only real mistake was that his company was not too big to fail.
01-21-2019 , 06:15 PM
Dear Lord, he's got the common sense and understanding of world affairs of a 5 year old (and I feel bad that I just insulted a bunch of 5 year olds).
01-21-2019 , 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stringbettor
What is the basis for the 2 million jobs that are able to be retrieved?
Magic Beans Ldo.
01-21-2019 , 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicholasp27
What’s bad about trade deficits again, John?
Inherently, nothing. But when the opportunity costs flip-flop the reason for having them becomes the reason for not having them.
01-21-2019 , 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
Inherently, nothing. But when the opportunity costs flip-flop the reason for having them becomes the reason for not having them.
01-21-2019 , 06:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Magic Beans Ldo.
i'd like to see some sort of citation for 2 million number that isn't pulled out of thin air, like from a economics journal or something but i'm so sure it's bs i'm not even gonna bother, you know?
01-21-2019 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
Inherently, nothing. But when the opportunity costs flip-flop the reason for having them becomes the reason for not having them.
wtf does this even mean?
01-21-2019 , 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
wtf does this even mean?
wtf doesn't it mean?
01-21-2019 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
i'd like to see some sort of citation for 2 million number that isn't pulled out of thin air, like from a economics journal or something but i'm so sure it's bs i'm not even gonna bother, you know?

http://reshorenow.org/december-5-2017/
For the first time in decades, more manufacturing jobs are returning to the United States than are going offshore. However, about 4 million manufacturing jobs have still been lost to offshoring over the last decades, based on the $500 billion U.S. trade deficit. The Reshoring Initiative concludes that about 25 percent of these jobs are reshorable at current levels of U.S. competitiveness. The survey will provide insight into the mix of policy changes needed to reshore the other 75 percent.
01-21-2019 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
Inherently, nothing. But when the opportunity costs flip-flop the reason for having them becomes the reason for not having them.

Guess I shouldn’t have bothered
01-21-2019 , 07:16 PM
Trump photos on his Facebook and Instagram accounts were photoshopped to make him look thinner AND to increase the lengths of his fingers
01-21-2019 , 07:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
wtf does this even mean?
Suppose advancing automation allows us to domestically manufacture textiles/apparel for the same cost as offshoring.
01-21-2019 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
Well “overall good” for whom and by what metrics is a big issue. But in an economic sense China is screwed. Their only out was to monopolize the tech market; after their “China 2025” plan leaked out, fat chance of that happening. Everyone is fixated on what the right hand is doing but take a glance at what the left is up to:

Remarks by Vice President Pence on the Administration’s Policy Toward China
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings...-toward-china/
I'm pretty bearish on the Chinese economic future, at least as far as taking over the world is concerned, but they are and will remain a long way from the days when their GDP per capita was $300.

And by "overall good" I mean humans generally. On some time scales it may not be clear what the environmental impact is, but in the long run I think China and India progressing as rapidly as possible towards a wealthier modern technologically advanced state will be good. The alternative is not them remaining in the pre-industrial age for a long time, but prolonging the worst of the industrial revolution along with population growth.

Even if you mean US 'Muricans only by "overall good" it's still probably for the overall good. Only if you mean a limited sub-set of 'Muricans is it maybe not for the "overall good" and a value system that places a modest negative impact on a small group of people still more than an order of magnitude richer than average over the lives of more than a billion people is awful.

Last edited by microbet; 01-21-2019 at 07:33 PM.
01-21-2019 , 07:38 PM

( twitter | raw text )
01-21-2019 , 07:45 PM

( twitter | raw text )
01-21-2019 , 07:48 PM
Good friend of mine who is a lawyer at POR's fed courthouse now working for free (three kids). What's the next decision-forcing milestone here? The Senate is going to vote on Trump's bull**** and somehow they think that's going to bring some Dems to their side? This entire thing is so ****ing unbelievably stupid.
01-21-2019 , 07:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by John21
http://reshorenow.org/december-5-2017/
For the first time in decades, more manufacturing jobs are returning to the United States than are going offshore. However, about 4 million manufacturing jobs have still been lost to offshoring over the last decades, based on the $500 billion U.S. trade deficit.
Your source doesn't seem to provide a source for this, is it just assuming that every $125,000 in trade deficit is a job lost? If so, it doesn't really make sense considering that not only did manufacturing jobs increase, so did our trade deficit with China.
01-21-2019 , 07:52 PM
Trump saying that "Amnesty will only be used for a much bigger deal" is an intolerable admission that should be jumped on. Had he said "regulations on emissions at aluminum plants" instead of amnesty, or even "punishment of Saudi Arabia" that would be fine. But "amnesty" is either clearly right or clearly wrong. Trump's statement implies either that he is willing to bargain away something that is clearly wrong, or worse yet, he thinks it is clearly right but is holding back something clearly right as a negotiating tactic.
01-21-2019 , 07:56 PM
yeah you nailed it. just a super ****ty president.
01-21-2019 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Your source doesn't seem to provide a source for this, is it just assuming that every $125,000 in trade deficit is a job lost? If so, it doesn't really make sense considering that not only did manufacturing jobs increase, so did our trade deficit with China.
I don't know if they derived that number from the ground up or divided the deficit by manufacturing output per worker. For some reason 6,000 jobs per $1B in deficit comes to mind. So $125K is in the ballpark I guess.
01-21-2019 , 08:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirOsis
Good friend of mine who is a lawyer at POR's fed courthouse now working for free (three kids). What's the next decision-forcing milestone here? The Senate is going to vote on Trump's bull**** and somehow they think that's going to bring some Dems to their side? This entire thing is so ****ing unbelievably stupid.
Has he considered credit cards?

Best wishes,

dth
01-21-2019 , 08:22 PM
we should have a worker exchange program so that Americans who want to work in manufacturing can move to China and do it for local wages there and Chinese who want to work in tech or education or the service industry can move here.

      
m