Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Right. The rise of the American style of evangelical Christianity, centered in the post WWII south, should be a huge tipoff that the entire movement is inseparable from white supremacy and a reaction to cultural changes that started during the period. The overlap between 'evangelicals' and Moore voters really isn't an accident. It's obviously hard to 'prove' but almost surely, the glib empirical causative reality is a bunch of super shook white people resistant to social changes, mostly the political and social status of black people and how those changes effected the view of themselves, their communities, their country -- stumbled into reactionary religious zealotry along with the whole panoply of reactionary regressive views -- trying furiously to undo the changing social and political arrangements. Religion is a trailing indicator in this case, not the leading one. The leading one was basically integration and black civil rights. Diving headlong into reactionary political and religious movements followed from there.
Really the tweet is emblematic of the 50 year long way this perpetually gets framed: these are 'values' voters, or 'evangelicals' or 'concerned about judges' or abortions or whatever. Lots of pretension.
Reframe it correctly:
"A very interesting piece of data from Alabama exit polls: While White women overall voted for Moore 63 to 34, when you break out evangelical racist vs non you get evangelical racist white women 76 - 22 Moore; non-evangelical racist white women 74 - 21 Jones!' "
No one likes that story much because it's mean to all those white people and people get frantic when you frame it like that, and obviously it becomes sort of circular and boring. But it's truer and tells a more accurate story of the social forces at work here. "Evangelical" is just how racists self-sorted themselves religiously over the past 50 years. Obviously there are some exceptions, with any set of data with tens of millions of data points there will always be outliers. I'm well aware of black evangelism, etc. But the point remains. The data isn't that interesting once you factor in that evangelical Christianity's post WWII ascendency was just another white supremacist totem.
This is partly correct, but I think it oversimplifies the issue considerably. The roots of evangelism in the American South trace back to long before WWII, and certainly to before the social upheaval of the 1960s.
Also, although white evangelicals in the South presumably are more racist than non-evangelicals, I'm not sure that their racism is leading them to evangelical religion, if that's what you are suggesting.
It may be more accurate to say that there are characteristics that, at least in South, make people more likely to be both evangelical and racist. Also, evangelical is a very broad term that captures a lot of different groups, which makes the sort of profiling that you are proposing pretty messy.