Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty Lice
Wouldn't Pitt be open for something like libel charges if he said something w/o proof?
Truth is a complete defense to libel and very often the testimony of the person who was harassed is the only proof there is. That surely was not the reason.
Even if Brad Pitt had been willing to damage his own career at the time by going public with accusations against Weinstein, he likely would not have done so unless Gwyneth Paltrow was on board with the idea. In other words, if she told him for whatever reason that she did not want to go public, what is he supposed to do?
In fact, I'm sure that BP and GP, like everyone else that Weinstein harassed or assaulted, quickly concluded that it was not in their interest to go public. And they probably were right. That's how he got away with this stuff for so long.