Quote:
\The fact that 50.8% is > 49.2% only matters if you're picking a winner (and doing so in a system where that's the criteria you use). If you're using those numbers to compare the values of candidates the only reasonable conclusion to draw is...
This dumbass derail needs to come to a close. You're framing the margin of victory in the way that seems least severe (49.2%, it's essentially 50/50!), he's framing the margin of victory to seem most severe (t-h-r-e-e M-I-L-L-I-O-N A-m-e-r-i-c-a-n-s!). The end, just ****ty frame jobs clashing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Hell you could take this further. Wyoming and it's 563k residents get two senators. California and it's 35 million residents get 2 senators as well.
Story checks out
I'd be interested in a detailed breakdown of the original rationale of the electoral college. Any good reads?