Lol you think the fact that you googled an out of context quote is proof you listened?

I am more confident you have never listened to the Harris podcast than I am of the existence of gravity. You are a complete fraud.

As I said, if there was anyway to bet fairly I would honestly bet my net worth on it.

You think Harris is a racist 100% because someone on Twitter called him that. Period.

This was a good post.

What's sad here is that I'm pretty sure you actually did read the quote.

I did read it. Your point?

The fact that he googled a quote is proof he has listened?

Clovis what was the quote about. Who was the speaker, what subject was it addressing, and what was the point the speaker was trying to make?

Yeah A+ work

I googled him and didn't recognise him, but after checking wiki, he's apparently the Outliers guy. So...yeah...

What is your point here fraud? That I didn't read the your stupid quote? If that was true why wouldn't I just do so right now before posting and pretend I had just like you constantly lie about having listened to Harris?

Your entire claim to knowing anything is predicated on your ability to google. You really are a joke. I'd actually bet money you haven't ever read a non-fiction book in your life.

You have the most obvious tell for being completly stupid in real life and over compensating on the net. It's that you can't make a single post without stating how smart you are and your amazing abilities to read people (on the Internet Lol).

You are David Sklansky.

So mad, so unhinged

Lol he wouldnt even answer the question

Get ****ed clovis you pathetic joke

You capitalized. You are half way to being literate. Keep working on it buddy.

Not unhinged. It's a smart bet.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah we must be less than a dozen posts away from you ragequitting again

Correct. And yes, I allowed the angle of you either going back and reading my post, googling the transcript yourself, or simply relying on your own memories of a podcast you claimed you had listened to.

I mean, you were familiar enough with the quote to claim I was taking it out of context, that means you were claiming to be both familiar with both what was in the quote AND what was around the quote.

Unless, and slow down if this sounds familiar, you have absolutely no ****ing idea what you're talking about. So I gambled pretty hard that not only did you not know, you wouldn't learn, and instead of answering my question you'd flip out into an insane tantrum.

This is such a terrible, terrible bet. ****ing everyone has read a non-fiction book in their life. Textbooks are non-fiction books, dumbass. So here's what we do. You figure out a way to test this bet we can do it up tonight. I've read a nonfiction book in my life.

I would argue being completely stupid here is a better indicator for being dumb in real life but whatever, not important.

Dude I'm dumb as ****, but I'm self-aware enough not to constantly faceplant. Like you did here, where you DIDN'T ANSWER ANY OF THE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE QUOTE.

Two posts later:

Literally thinks it's a "smart bet" that someone got through law school without ever reading a nonfiction book

*thinkingemoji*

Still not quite right. You need punctuation to end a sentence. Keep working on it little buddy. I have faith you can eventually match the intellect of a 4th grader. Keep up the hard work.

Why exactly would I debate you in good faith, fraud? You are not trying to do so.

Consecutive posts critiquing my punctuation, this guy is totally not unhinged and completely winning this exchange

Still not quite right.

I'm not trying to win anything. I'm toying with two idiots purely for my amusement at this point.

It's actually rather fun.

Perhaps I gave into hyperbole there. I'd bet he hasn't read a book he wasn't forced to in class.

lol you didn't even listen to the Harris/Klein podcast or read the transcript, incredible, and you definitely didn't read the post I made about it.

Why do you do this to yourself? Just ****ing google it, bro, you can get caught up in 10 minutes. I mean, then you will need to admit that you were wrong, but everyone already knows you're wrong. This way in addition to be wrong you're embarrassing yourself by still trying to imply I took a quote out of context when you absolutely have no idea what is in the quote I keep referencing.

This is like a weird metacommentary on the Harris/Klein thing where Klein, and I, were bending over backwards to be civil, to quote stuff accurately, etc. and Harris and you are just absolutely melting down in shrieking disbelief that someone would have the gall to disagree with you.

Booked. $1k? This is just a bizarre bet. I think like, every literate adult has read at least one book. Like 90% for sure. In their ENTIRE LIFE?

Rotfl. How very trumpian of you. Accusing me of doing what I'm accusing you of doing.

This is fun.

What was the quote about, Clovis?

While we are at it we should bet on how many times you jerked off last month.