Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
What is your point here fraud? That I didn't read the your stupid quote? If that was true why wouldn't I just do so right now before posting and pretend I had just like you constantly lie about having listened to Harris?
Correct. And yes, I allowed the angle of you either going back and reading my post, googling the transcript yourself, or simply relying on your own memories of a podcast you claimed you had listened to.
I mean, you were familiar enough with the quote to claim I was taking it out of context, that means you were claiming to be both familiar with both what was in the quote AND what was around the quote.
Unless, and slow down if this sounds familiar, you have absolutely no ****ing idea what you're talking about. So I gambled pretty hard that not only did you not know, you wouldn't learn, and instead of answering my question you'd flip out into an insane tantrum.
Quote:
Your entire claim to knowing anything is predicated on your ability to google. You really are a joke. I'd actually bet money you haven't ever read a non-fiction book in your life.
This is such a terrible, terrible bet. ****ing everyone has read a non-fiction book in their life. Textbooks are non-fiction books, dumbass. So here's what we do. You figure out a way to test this bet we can do it up tonight. I've read a nonfiction book in my life.
Quote:
You have the most obvious tell for being completly stupid in real life and over compensating on the net.
I would argue being completely stupid here is a better indicator for being dumb in real life but whatever, not important.
Quote:
It's that you can't make a single post without stating how smart you are and your amazing abilities to read people (on the Internet Lol).
You are David Sklansky.
Dude I'm dumb as ****, but I'm self-aware enough not to constantly faceplant. Like you did here, where you DIDN'T ANSWER ANY OF THE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE QUOTE.