Quote:
Originally Posted by stringbettor
Listened to Hannity last night on the way home as he was going after Muellers team. He blamed Weissman for costing 10k people their jobs due to his role in the prosecution of Arthur Anderson during the Enron scandal. Basically said because the conviction was overturned 9-0 by the supreme court it proves Weissman was an incompetent and overzealous prosecutor. Was curious so I looked it up and 5 min on Google showed the case was overturned because the jury instructions were not accurate. How would that have anything to do with the prosecutor?
Well, to be fair, generally the parties (including the state) each submit their proposed jury instructions from which the judge chooses which ones are appropriate to read to the jury. It's possible that Weissman included the faulty instructions in his proposed instructions.
Obviously still a really stupid attack by Hannity.