Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

02-18-2017 , 11:02 PM
Well, according to this site: http://concealedcarrykillers.org almost 1000 people have been killed since 2007 by people with concealed carry licenses.
02-18-2017 , 11:04 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.07bbaab671bf says there have been 29 mass murders committed by people with concealed carry permits since 2007. Maybe these are't good guys with guns?
02-18-2017 , 11:06 PM
Oh, and then there is http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/2...y-s-Body-Count which says in 722 murders committed by concealed carry permit holders only 16 where ruled self defense. Also noted was that 17 of the murders were of police officers...
02-19-2017 , 08:17 AM
No you don't get it, people like fuluck and his friends REALLY ARE the good guys. What's so ****ing hard to understand here??
02-19-2017 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesbassman
I suppose that means if I come home to find an intruder stabbing my spouse or kids to death, I'm not allowed to use lethal force to stop him. I just gotta stand down and watch, or perhaps try to engage him hand-to-hand without using a weapon.

That's obviously insane, but thankfully our laws weren't written by people that nuts.

The only "wet dream" here is your (bizarrely sexual) fantasy that CCW holders are running around "blazing away" at bad guys. Most of the country allows CCW, and despite the rare anecdotes, that's not happening.
That's the thing, these incidents are very rare.

So is it a net benefit to have people carrying guns around in public or not? Personally, I believe it is not. Introducing guns to a tense situation rarely ends well and those few instances like where the cop was saved are hardly balanced out by all the times where someone pulls out a gun and shoots someone over a stupid argument.
02-21-2017 , 01:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sumey
No you don't get it, people like fuluck and his friends REALLY ARE the good guys. What's so ****ing hard to understand here??
I do know for a fact that I REALLY AM one of the good guys? So why the hell should I be punished for the irresponsible actions of others?

I'll circle back to the point I made earlier, Once you figure out a way to get Guns out of the hands of criminals, I will gladly turn mine in. Until that happens, I will continue to carry everyday.
02-21-2017 , 08:28 AM
fu do you believe in other countries theyve figured out how to get guns out of the hands of criminals with reasonable effectiveness (obviously 100% effectiveness is impossiblw for any law)?
02-21-2017 , 10:25 AM
You aren't the one be punished fu, the extra 900 people who were murdered by CCW people were. If there was another product or service out there that killed 50 people for every 1 satisfied customer why would we let that keep existing?
02-21-2017 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
So if you see a person getting beat to death in an alleyway, you should call for help. It'll only take the cops 10 minutes to get there, I mean, how much damage can be done in 10 minutes, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Where is the law that says you have the right to defend someone else? I'm fine with guns being used for self defense but I'm not interested in some gun nut thinking a CCW permit makes him a cop.
I didn't see an answer really, so just to be clear, if you see a person getting beat to death in an alleyway, you should call for help and then watch, right?
02-21-2017 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
I didn't see an answer really, so just to be clear, if you see a person getting beat to death in an alleyway, you should call for help and then watch, right?
Are you suggesting that all people entitled to carry weapons should carry weapons in case they see someone getting beat to death in an alley?
02-21-2017 , 12:26 PM
Nope...

Asking kerowo a question to clarify his position.
02-21-2017 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
Nope...

Asking kerowo a question to clarify his position.
Okay but you asked him what he should do knowing he doesn't carry so the answer can't be shoot the person beating the other to death so it must be something else, like call the cops try to raise an alarm let the attacker know the cops are on the way etc.

Your request for clarification is pretty loaded but if a person isn't carrying then shooting the attacker isn't an option.
02-21-2017 , 12:31 PM
Sorry dereds, the convo was in response to him saying carriers shouldn't intervene - hopefully that clears things up.
02-21-2017 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
I didn't see an answer really, so just to be clear, if you see a person getting beat to death in an alleyway, you should call for help and then watch, right?
If the alternative is to try to break up the fight, get so scared you "fear for your life" and shoot someone, then yes.
02-21-2017 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
Sorry dereds, the convo was in response to him saying carriers shouldn't intervene - hopefully that clears things up.
The only stats I've found, and I apologize for using a poker analogy, show that someone being justifiably killed by someone with a CCW license is a 1 outer. That doesn't seem like a stat that makes for a good policy.
02-21-2017 , 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
If the alternative is to try to break up the fight, get so scared you "fear for your life" and shoot someone, then yes.
I'd say that's a possible alternative, not the alternative.

But, roger that, one in favor of sit back and watch the victim get beat to death.
02-21-2017 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
I'd say that's a possible alternative, not the alternative.

But, roger that, one in favor of sit back and watch the victim get beat to death.
Is it not possible to intervene without a gun?
02-21-2017 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Lol gun nuts

You're nothing but stooges who help corporations make faulty guns for a nickle cheaper
02-21-2017 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Is it not possible to intervene without a gun?
Doesn't really matter, as Kerowo's point was that you should never put yourself in a position where you feel so unsafe that you might kill someone as a result.

Just gotta watch it happen.
02-21-2017 , 01:58 PM
Really how often does someone come across another human being "beat to death"? Not to mention the decision with whether to shoot or hold them there and wait for the cops or whatever your options are. Like self defense I get because someone may break into your house or try to mug you and it's pretty cut and dry but the whole "saving bystanders" thing is pure fantasy. The best most of these guys seem to do is fire off some potshots at fleeing criminals.
02-21-2017 , 02:01 PM
IDK dude, it's a hypothetical?
02-21-2017 , 04:00 PM
That old due in Florida who shot the guy in the movie theater when they got in an argument about talking on a cell phone is claiming stand your ground.

Good job Florida!
02-21-2017 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
Doesn't really matter, as Kerowo's point was that you should never put yourself in a position where you feel so unsafe that you might kill someone as a result.

Just gotta watch it happen.
We are talking about intervention while armed. If you aren't armed or can resist using a gun then that's another topic.
02-21-2017 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
I'd say that's a possible alternative, not the alternative.

But, roger that, one in favor of sit back and watch the victim get beat to death.
lol gunnuts are bar none the most masterful when it comes to unrealistic hypotheticals which fail to address the issue.

but yeah roger that! kerowo saying non-intervention is preferable is definitely the same as saying we should all sit back and watch people get beat to death rather than pulling a firearm! point, gunnuts!

hypothetical: you see an NFL linebacker with hemophelia get into a fight with a 5'2 woman who has 6 inch fake nails. WHO DOES TSAO SHOOT? Or do you just sit back and wait for one of them to die? Roger that.
02-21-2017 , 09:34 PM
Playing in the NFL seems like a poor career choice for a hemophiliac. But if you have that much info about him you probably aren't a casual bystander.

      
m