Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

07-17-2013 , 11:08 PM
Thanks, Obama.
07-18-2013 , 04:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula72
Nevermind, I have gotton 2 more pms about this being a place where anti gun guys come to "circle jerk" with each other so I guess I wont get the any good responses. I'll leave you guys alone.
Are pro gunners now keeping watch on who enters this thread to warn each other to stay away?

You guys are so awesome.
07-18-2013 , 08:36 AM
The "gun nuts" do not feel the need to keep winning the argument. Constitutionally guaranteed right, upheld by the Supreme Court, practiced all over the USA since its inception.

A bunch of people posting insults on 2+2 isn't going to change that and neither is any elected official in the USA.

In closing, we are sorry you guys are all butthurt that gun ownership is a right we will not give up. Gtfoverit.
07-18-2013 , 09:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
The "gun nuts" do not feel the need to keep winning the argument. Constitutionally guaranteed right, upheld by the Supreme Court, practiced all over the USA since its inception.

A bunch of people posting insults on 2+2 isn't going to change that and neither is any elected official in the USA.

In closing, we are sorry you guys are all butthurt that gun ownership is a right we will not give up. Gtfoverit.
Yea, but it will make them feel better about themselves
07-18-2013 , 10:46 AM
Gun extremists do win the 'make fallacious arguments' game. Also pretty good at calling people variations of the word stupid and retreating into sand castles of self-declared superiority at first sight of a gun prohibitionist's opinion.
07-18-2013 , 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greeksquared
Average yearly homicides in Chicago
1990-1994: 901
2008-2012: 470

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago
they must having quit including cops killings since 2008.
07-18-2013 , 10:49 AM
Not that I would listen to Joe Biden, but getting arrested for shooting a gun in the air to ward off an intruder:

http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/17/ma...ooting-charge/

Something is seriously wrong. Maybe next time he should just lay down so guy can rob his house or kill him and his family?
07-18-2013 , 10:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Gun extremists do win the 'make fallacious arguments' game. Also pretty good at calling people variations of the word stupid and retreating into sand castles of self-declared superiority at first sight of a gun prohibitionist's opinion.
Extremists? We are the definition of mainstream. I love how you try to frame it. Always has been and always will be legal. Extremists are the one trying to take away constitutionally guaranteed rights.
07-18-2013 , 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DebtVulture
Not that I would listen to Joe Biden, but getting arrested for shooting a gun in the air to ward off an intruder:

http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/17/ma...ooting-charge/

Something is seriously wrong. Maybe next time he should just lay down so guy can rob his house or kill him and his family?
I have a little news for everyone, when you call the police there job is to arrest you or at least try to . if your choking, drowning ,on fire , or have your brother has just been murdered they will run your id search your house and try and find any and everything to arrest you on. Matters not if your are a victum , to them it is a chance to arrest you.
07-18-2013 , 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
The "gun nuts" do not feel the need to keep winning the argument. Constitutionally guaranteed right, upheld by the Supreme Court, practiced all over the USA since its inception.

A bunch of people posting insults on 2+2 isn't going to change that and neither is any elected official in the USA.

In closing, we are sorry you guys are all butthurt that gun ownership is a right we will not give up. Gtfoverit.
At least you've given up all pretense of being for stricter gun control.
07-18-2013 , 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
Extremists? We are the definition of mainstream. I love how you try to frame it. Always has been and always will be legal. Extremists are the one trying to take away constitutionally guaranteed rights.
Extremist is the perfect frame for the NRA and the like. Has not always been and does not always have to be.

Extremists use an abridged version of a constitutional right and tend to rely on extra-constitutional footnotes to support their interpretations.

"We are the definition of mainstream" is one of those self-declared superiorities I was mentioning. I'm not moved by appeals to popularity much at all, even when not dubious.
07-18-2013 , 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Gun extremists do win the 'make fallacious arguments' game. Also pretty good at calling people variations of the word stupid and retreating into sand castles of self-declared superiority at first sight of a gun prohibitionist's opinion.
Yawn
07-18-2013 , 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
Thanks, Obama.
2008-2012: that's when Obama was away from the city. Is Obama responsible for murders in Chicago?

/drudgery
07-18-2013 , 04:14 PM
Yo, Pilkain, mucksandgrav - the guy who shows up specifically to say that he doesn't feel the need to keep winning the argument is de facto refuting his own claim. You get that, right?
07-19-2013 , 09:57 AM
Relevant to this thread:

07-19-2013 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
The "gun nuts" do not feel the need to keep winning the argument. Constitutionally guaranteed right, upheld by the Supreme Court, practiced all over the USA since its inception.

A bunch of people posting insults on 2+2 isn't going to change that and neither is any elected official in the USA.

In closing, we are sorry you guys are all butthurt that gun ownership is a right we will not give up. Gtfoverit.
LOL. Whatever you need to tell yourself, I guess.
07-20-2013 , 03:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula72
lol...this proves nobody can be responsible.
you're right, those incidents are all due to people being irresponsible. But it's also true that all the people involved in those incidents would still be alive if guns had not been involved. but because gun-lovers have a kill-or-be-killed mentality, they fight tooth and nail to defend some ancient, out-dated, and irrational part of the constitution that gives them the right to carry weapons, all while missing the bigger picture.

And btw, George Zimmerman was irresponsible with his gun too, and it doesn't even matter because Florida law is so ****ed up.
07-20-2013 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by archimedes11
you're right, those incidents are all due to people being irresponsible. But it's also true that all the people involved in those incidents would still be alive if guns had not been involved. but because gun-lovers have a kill-or-be-killed mentality, they fight tooth and nail to defend some ancient, out-dated, and irrational part of the constitution that gives them the right to carry weapons, all while missing the bigger picture.

And btw, George Zimmerman was irresponsible with his gun too, and it doesn't even matter because Florida law is so ****ed up.
You do understand that a lot of those incidents are caused by guns that can never be illegal no matter what happens? Do you think that people with clean backgrounds and firearms training should be able not own a .38 revolver?

I laugh when gun nuts tell me that they should arm teachers in schools. Its absolutely insane. But if believe yes in the previous question, which you may not, then yes your just as insane as the nuts on the otherside.
07-21-2013 , 05:13 AM
Why do some people believe "The Right To Bear Arms" is like the only Amendment that should remain "pure" and free of regulation?

They probably think Thomas Jefferson would have wanted my 18 year old nephew to be allowed to strap an M61 Vulcan to his old Jeep Cherokee...you know, for protection. It's essentially the same thing as a Blunderbus or musket.
07-21-2013 , 05:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula72

I laugh when gun nuts tell me that they should arm teachers in schools. .
It's highly unlikely that these folks had the distinct pleasure of being educated by our nation's stellar public school teachers. Had they gotten this experience they'd realize the majority straight dislike kids, nevermind care enough to teach well, and would likely think twice about arming them before setting them loose in rooms full of children.

BTW: This concept of strapping our nation's teachers to prevent school shootings ranks high on my list of halfwit conservative solutions to our country's problems.
07-21-2013 , 05:29 AM
Why do some people believe "The Right To Bear Arms" is like the only Amendment that should remain "pure" and free of regulation?

They probably think Thomas Jefferson would have wanted my 18 year old nephew to be allowed to strap an M61 Vulcan to his old Jeep Cherokee...you know, for protection. It's essentially the same thing as a Blunderbus or musket.
07-21-2013 , 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula72
You do understand that a lot of those incidents are caused by guns that can never be illegal no matter what happens? Do you think that people with clean backgrounds and firearms training should be able not own a .38 revolver?
I'm all for training and education, but it's not required now to own a gun.

Problem is, any legislation to require people to be trained on firearm safety would be looked at as a first step to an all out gun ban by gun nuts.

      
m