Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

06-08-2013 , 06:07 PM
Clearly if Obama had been tapping his internet harder he could have stopped this.
06-08-2013 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
I grew up with a gf who lived in Prattville. Seems about right
06-08-2013 , 06:53 PM
Let's hold every last one of these bastards responsible.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...hecks-proposal
Quote:
An amendment proposed by Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) to require background checks for commercial gun sales (but not for sales between "friends and neighbors") was shot down Wednesday afternoon in a 54-46 vote, failing to capture the 60 votes it needed to advance. The bill would have been a modest victory for gun control advocates, while ceding numerous concessions to the gun lobby (the NRA initially called it a "positive development.") Nevertheless, only four Republicans voted for the proposal, with 41 voting against it. Five Democrats rejected the proposal as well (Reid was a special case; see below). Standing with families of Sandy Hook victims, President Obama said that "there was no coherent argument for why we wouldn't do this. It came down to politics."
[...]

Democrats Who Voted Against the Proposal

Max Baucus (D-Mont.)
Mark Begich (D-Alaska)
Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.)
Mark Pryor (D-Ark.)
Harry Reid (D-Nev.) (Voted "no" as a procedural move to preserve option to reintroduce the bill.)

Republicans Who Voted Against the Proposal

Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.)
Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.)
John Barrasso (R-Wyo.)
Roy Blunt (R-Mo.)
John Boozman (R-Ark.)
Richard Burr (R-N.C.)
Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.)
Dan Coats (R-Ind.)
Tom Coburn (R-Okla.)
Thad Cochran (R-Miss.)
Bob Corker (R-Tenn.)
John Cornyn (R-Texas)
Mike Crapo (R-Idaho)
Ted Cruz (R-Texas)
Michael Enzi (R-Wyo.)
Deb Fischer (R-Neb.)
Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.)
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa)
Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)
Dean Heller (R-Nev.)
John Hoeven (R-N.D.)
Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.)
Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.)
Mike Johanns (R-Neb.)
Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)
Mike Lee (R-Utah)
Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)
Jerry Moran (R-Kan.)
Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska)
Rand Paul (R-Ky.)
Rob Portman (R-Ohio)
James Risch (R-Idaho)
Pat Roberts (R-Kan.)
Marco Rubio (R-Fla.)
Timothy Scott (R-S.C.)
Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.)
Richard Shelby (R-Ala.)
John Thune (R-S.D.)
David Vitter (R-La.)
Roger Wicker (R-Miss.)
06-08-2013 , 07:12 PM
Uh they are already required right?
06-08-2013 , 07:17 PM
No, not always.

Quote:
In 33 states, private gun owners are not restricted from selling guns at gun shows. Buyers who purchase guns from individuals are not required to submit to the federal background checks in place for licensed dealers.
FFL dealers have to run the checks but 'private sellers' don't, even when at an event where they run booths next to each other.
06-08-2013 , 07:30 PM
so if I buy from a private buyer at a gun show, I don't have to futz around with getting my license address changed?
06-08-2013 , 07:32 PM
Depends on the state it would seem.
06-08-2013 , 07:33 PM
33/50 chance ain't bad
06-08-2013 , 07:34 PM
The states that go out of their way to make it as easy as possible for gun nuts to get AKs without any background check whatsoever make it really really hard for the sensible states to protect themselves as well.
06-08-2013 , 07:40 PM
Mental illness seems to be the common denominator in all of these shootings. Any new legislation should address that problem in detail.
06-08-2013 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
The states that go out of their way to make it as easy as possible for gun nuts to get AKs without any background check whatsoever make it really really hard for the sensible states to protect themselves as well.
Residents of sensible states are not ignorant enough to believe that you can buy an ak legally.
06-08-2013 , 07:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
Mental illness seems to be the common denominator in all of these shootings. Any new legislation should address that problem in detail.
Absolutely agree. We need massive additional funding for mental health programs in every state and a commission to address and act on the problem of these mentally ill people being treated as criminals throughout their lives. The prisons have been filling with the mentally ill for years, they need to be treated separately. And they need to have a chance to get treatment before they commit some crime that lands them in prison for years or life.
06-08-2013 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
Residents of sensible states are not ignorant enough to believe that you can buy an ak legally.
You're joking right? You can buy them online, you can even have them shipped to California with a slight modification to make them legal in that state. If you purchase them privately rather than from a dealer you need not be background checked in almost every single state of the union.
06-08-2013 , 08:23 PM
All,

We need to be courageous and discuss mental illness even though the anti-gun industry, which is making money hand over fist, want to ignore mental illness entirely.

helpfully,
goofball
06-08-2013 , 09:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
Mental illness seems to be the common denominator in all of these shootings. Any new legislation should address that problem in detail.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
Residents of sensible states are not ignorant enough to believe that you can buy an ak legally.
Itt the definition of an assault rifle must be kept very precise, right down to the differences between AR15s and AK47s within the context of mass shootings by an individual against a group of unarmed people. While the definition of "mental illness" needs no specificity at all.
06-08-2013 , 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoknows
Itt the definition of an assault rifle must be kept very precise, right down to the differences between AR15s and AK47s within the context of mass shootings by an individual against a group of unarmed people. While the definition of "mental illness" needs no specificity at all.
When it is done intentionally to try to scare people into advocating a particular position yes it is important. What clarification do you need on the mental illness point?
06-08-2013 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofball
All,

We need to be courageous and discuss mental illness even though the anti-gun industry, which is making money hand over fist, want to ignore mental illness entirely.

helpfully,
goofball
The gun control lobby has done a very good job of ignoring it as well. When Jared Loughner shot Gabriel Giffords did he have an assault rifle or an extended magazine? Would any legislation proposed by the gun control lobby have stopped that shooting? He was however mentally ill. As was the shooter in Aurora, VA Tech, and Sandy Hook. Interesting that the gun control lobby is focused on the weapons used in some of those events, but not the common denominator in all four.
06-08-2013 , 11:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
You're joking right? You can buy them online, you can even have them shipped to California with a slight modification to make them legal in that state. If you purchase them privately rather than from a dealer you need not be background checked in almost every single state of the union.
AK47s are automatic rifles. They are illegal to own in the USA.
06-08-2013 , 11:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
The gun control lobby has done a very good job of ignoring it as well. When Jared Loughner shot Gabriel Giffords did he have an assault rifle or an extended magazine? Would any legislation proposed by the gun control lobby have stopped that shooting? He was however mentally ill. As was the shooter in Aurora, VA Tech, and Sandy Hook. Interesting that the gun control lobby is focused on the weapons used in some of those events, but not the common denominator in all four.
I'm sure then that you support stronger background checks on all gun sales so we can check for mental illness.
06-08-2013 , 11:18 PM
Suzzer, don't bother. It's been explained to him over and over that mental health initiatives are a part of the solution but every week or so he circles back to the same nonsense.
06-08-2013 , 11:32 PM
Man, I want nothing more than the government to have a big list of people who have ever dealt with some mental health issue.
06-08-2013 , 11:40 PM
What if its just for the purpose of identification?
06-08-2013 , 11:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Man, I want nothing more than the government to have a big list of people who are currently trying to buy a gun who have ever dealt with some mental health issue.
I agree wholeheartedly.
06-08-2013 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilkain
The gun control lobby has done a very good job of ignoring it as well. When Jared Loughner shot Gabriel Giffords did he have an assault rifle or an extended magazine? Would any legislation proposed by the gun control lobby have stopped that shooting? He was however mentally ill. As was the shooter in Aurora, VA Tech, and Sandy Hook. Interesting that the gun control lobby is focused on the weapons used in some of those events, but not the common denominator in all four.
Err, yes, he had an extended magazine and was stopped because he had to reload after emptying those 30 rounds into his victims.

Plus, what is the solution here, if you do not have solid background checks in place what mental health laws should be getting passed exactly? Are the mentally ill being targeted for extra treatment or to stop them getting guns, cos the first is really really costly and bumps into numerous civil liberty issues whereas the second is practically free and should be part of the first regardless.

Given the anti gun lobby wont pass a law that ikes claims would do nothing what law is going to get passed exactly? Do you think this congress is up for extending some more taxes to pay for mental healthcare for example?

      
m