ITT suzzer laughs at his own ignorance. Unfortunately that ignorance made it into the 'assault rifle' law. Pretty sure this bushmaster used in conn wouldnt be an assault rifle.

I thought he might be confusing them since he's been seeming to for quite some time ITT but wasn't sure.

His last post leads me to believe he is.

oh jesus it's assault weapon? That's even dumber. My weapons are not made for assault homie, just hugs.

People don't "blow up ****" at a gun range. They make small holes in paper/cardboard targets.

BS on this (atleast in the South)

People love hauling all manner of random stuff out there and destroying it. Obama campaign yard signs got pretty popular at one point.

I've been at a gun range where a dude was shooting an assault rifle (seemed automatic but maybe he was just really really fast on the trigger, couldn't see the gun) out of the back of a van at a propane tank.

What is the reasoning behind banning semi-automatic handguns but not revolvers?

Guess I've been going to the wrong gun ranges, then, lol.

Well, I shouldn't really call it a range. It's a berm at the end of a field with a few picnic tables set up that everyone is able to use. Not sure if it's public land or if the guy that owns it just doesn't care.

When I owned guns I always pulled my van up to the gun range and fired from the backseat.

One of my favorite gun range memories is a guy literally rolling a wheel barrow full of guns from his truck to the picnic tables. As a kid that was the most badass thing I had ever seen and I was begging my parents for a gun for a month after that

lol

Less scary ldo

Apparently you've never been to an outdoor gun range.

How did parents so negligent raise such a sophisticated young man as yourself?

Maybe older children, say junior high students and older should have the right to carry in school. It sounds crazy, but at least it's something most americans would consider as a way to protect their children. At least the parents who believe that the more guns that are in circulation = more gun shot victims = even more guns need to be in circulation to stop the increased gun shot victims.

I probably wouldn't have let myself go to the gun range either. But I had been begging to try target shooting for a couple years and they finally broke down and let me go with a long time family friend who was retired ATF (or something like that) and we shot a .22 at targets. I dont remember the details but I think he found a convenient reason to leave once the wheelbarrow started rolling up.

My interpretation is he's got some vague beef with the legal definition of "assault rifle," but isn't going to tell us what the beef is.

Trololololol

Exactly.

What type of gun is responsible for the majority of gun deaths and is most commonly used by criminals?

I'm guessing it's handguns. Semi-automatic? In your scenario it quickly becomes the revolver.

If your reason for banning semi-automatics is because, "more people use them". This doesn't seem all that productive. Is there a better reason?

To be more to the point, why would you ban a semi-automatic handgun that has the same capacity for holding ammunition as a revolver?

If you can't figure out how to fire a gun that's not semi-automatic, that's on you. And semi-automatic rifles limited to 10 rounds without a removable magazine would be permitted. Find me a use for an AR-15 that couldn't be covered with one of my allowed guns.

This ban will never get passed, it's just what I think would be effective.

Of course they will get their hands on guns. Shootings will still happen. We should try to limit the damage that is done.

Armed teachers can only respond once the shooting starts. We need to try to prevent the shooting from starting.

Here's an idea: let's just make all guns pink. That would never get passed because they would have to revoke your man card.

guys

jim thinks we should stop the shootings from happening in the first place.

problem solved.