Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

12-28-2012 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendricks433
His % and your random made up % are completely different.

I have no way to know for sure on #2. It's definitely possible.
No, we both made up percentages. His percentage isn't based on any data, either.

Possible? Come on. Be honest. There hasn't been one murder that was committed or one brandishing a firearm in the entire known world that wouldn't have occurred had the person not had a gun on them? You're just giving that a "Possible"?
12-28-2012 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Sure
OK, so, you agree that CCW have committed crimes they wouldn't have otherwise because they had a gun handy. Thank you.

Now, what would be different about the General CCW population, versus the Teacher CCW population. If we agree that the CCW population commit crimes with guns, why would we think that the Teacher CCW population wouldn't commit crimes with guns?
12-28-2012 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benholio
Handful of lives that could be saved with magazine restrictions = no big deal, not worth the inconvenience.

Less-than-winniny-the-lottery chance of a life saved in a home invasion shooting because they had large magazines = justification for having large magazines.
Not to mention that maybe if we could get a handle on all the guns out there, the incidents of home invasions might go down too.
12-28-2012 , 12:38 PM
The teacher stabbed him with a pen? Did the kid make a joke about his shine box?
12-28-2012 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
No, we both made up percentages. His percentage isn't based on any data, either.

Possible? Come on. Be honest. There hasn't been one murder that was committed or one brandishing a firearm in the entire known world that wouldn't have occurred had the person not had a gun on them? You're just giving that a "Possible"?
Of course if someone shot someone and had you taken their gun away they shouldn't shot the person and killed them. They also could have easily been carrying a gun if they didn't have a CPL.

After 12 years of teachers being able to carry there isn't a single incident or accident.
12-28-2012 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
I mean, sometimes? Sure whatever, that's not exactly a high bar to jump over. However, ccw holders are extremely unlikely to commit any crime, so your point is, well, pointless.


Just wanted to use that picture for something :P
12-28-2012 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
OK, so, you agree that CCW have committed crimes they wouldn't have otherwise because they had a gun handy. Thank you.

Now, what would be different about the General CCW population, versus the Teacher CCW population. If we agree that the CCW population commit crimes with guns, why would we think that the Teacher CCW population wouldn't commit crimes with guns?
Someone is saying this? It's cute you think you're making a point, when in reality your embarrassing yourself.
12-28-2012 , 12:40 PM
i didn't make up the percentage, i think it was the estimate in the CNN article IIRC.
12-28-2012 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
The teacher stabbed him with a pen? Did the kid make a joke about his shine box?
you're conflating scenes from two movies
12-28-2012 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
The teacher stabbed him with a pen? Did the kid make a joke about his shine box?
This post amused me.
12-28-2012 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
you're conflating scenes from two movies
My bad.
12-28-2012 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Someone is saying this? It's cute you think you're making a point, when in reality your embarrassing yourself.
People are implying the bolded. I said that if we arm teachers, we would at some point see one of those guns used on a student by a teacher. Several people leapt to arms, saying that it hasn't happened in Utah, even though it may just be a small sample size issue, since we don't know how many teachers have carried.

What I am trying to get across is:
  • Some people who Conceal-Carry commit crimes with guns
  • Teachers who Conceal-Carry are no different than the Conceal-Carry population at large
  • Therefore, at some point, a Teacher who Conceal-Carries will commit a crime with a gun

I think that is pretty logical, yes? If you disagree, which of those three points do you disagree with?
12-28-2012 , 12:46 PM
The point is that what is important is relative rates, not absolute, aka will this increase or decrease bad outcomes. I have no idea how this is hard for you.
12-28-2012 , 12:47 PM


accounts banned on facebook for this quote

edit* "in before but gandhi meant military arms you stupid sloth!"

still crazy what facebook has been up to

full quote btw for better context:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gandhi
I used to issue leaflets asking people to enlist as recruits. One of the arguments I had used was distasteful to the Commissioner: 'Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest. If we want the Arms Act to be repealed, if we want to learn the use of arms, here is a golden opportunity. If the middle classes render voluntary help to Government in the hour of its trial, distrust will disappear, and the ban on possessing arms will be withdrawn.' The Commissioner referred to this and said that he appreciated my presence in the conference in spite of the differences between us. And I had to justify my standpoint as courteously as I could.
what a crazy **** gun nut

Last edited by turbosloth; 12-28-2012 at 12:52 PM.
12-28-2012 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbosloth


accounts banned on facebook for this quote
?
12-28-2012 , 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
i didn't make up the percentage, i think it was the estimate in the CNN article IIRC.
No, you made it up. The article on CNN said, small fraction. .000001/100 and 1/100 are both small fractions.
12-28-2012 , 12:49 PM
They should be. Einstein actually said that.
12-28-2012 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
No, you made it up. The article on CNN said, small fraction. .000001/100 and 1/100 are both small fractions.
Sorry no I didn't make it up, I am misapplying it, however.

It's from this article:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1228792

They estimate 1% of teachers are licensed to carry, not do carry in schools.

MY BAD.
12-28-2012 , 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
The point is that what is important is relative rates, not absolute, aka will this increase or decrease bad outcomes. I have no idea how this is hard for you.
Yes, and you have no idea if this will increase or decrease bad outcomes. Acting like you do is silly. I have no idea how this is hard for you.
12-28-2012 , 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
Yes, and you have no idea if this will increase or decrease bad outcomes. Acting like you do is silly. I have no idea how this is hard for you.
only evidence we have so far is that there have been no accidents or issues with teachers carrying in Utah schools.
12-28-2012 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
Yes, and you have no idea if this will increase or decrease bad outcomes. Acting like you do is silly. I have no idea how this is hard for you.
Am I saying that? Or am I saying that your reasoning is ******ed?
12-28-2012 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
Stop making up percentages, I just got wrist slapped for that you should as well.

And please answer the following:

Do you agree that sometimes, law-abiding citizens who are licensed conceal carriers commit crimes that they wouldn't otherwise had they not had a gun handy?

Yes or No please.
Would you like to take guns away form the police?

Do you agree that sometimes police officers commit crimes they wouldn't otherwise had they not had a gun handy?
12-28-2012 , 12:55 PM
Teachers are probably one of the better groups you could arm. No matter what, as a teacher you always have the upper hand, gun or not. Suspensions, in control of grades, detention, sending someone to the office.

A scarier carrying scenario (for me) would be an office setting with a group of adults.
12-28-2012 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
only evidence we have so far is that there have been no accidents or issues with teachers carrying in Utah schools.
Sample size.

We have a large sample size of citizens carrying weapons legally that have committed crimes. Again, I ask: What would be different about the population of Teachers that Conceal Carry than the population of Citizens that Conceal Carry? Why would would the 2nd group commit crimes (even Ikes agrees!), but the first group wouldn't?
12-28-2012 , 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
Sample size.

We have a large sample size of citizens carrying weapons legally that have committed crimes at a rate much lower than the rest of the population
Lol u

      
m